Subj : Re: Who's at war
To   : Gregory Deyss
From : Alan Ianson
Date : Sat Apr 08 2023 07:57 pm

>> Nothing I have said relates to Alvin Bragg or the indictments Donald
>> Trump is now facing.

> It's oddly similar to what you have stated "Donald Trump is an dishonest man
> after all we have seen and experienced these past few years?" now lets
> compare this to what Alvin Bragg is attempting to do with these 34 charges
> to a underlining crime of which has NOT as yet been defined or explained.

Yes, when I say that I am not talking about Bragg ot the charges he has laid.

> Donald Trump responds
> Trump pointedly noted that Mueller, I assume, for $35 million, checked my
> taxes, checked my financials. They checked my financials, and they checked my
> taxes, I assume the inference being that since Mueller had looked at them,
> there is no need for Congress to review them also.

The Mueller investigation did not exonerate Trump in any way. You must know that.

> Charging someone 34 times or even more then twice is meant to be a form of
> intimidation. What you seem to think and is quite obvious is that Trump is a
> liar simply because what has been viewed through the lens of a liberal eyes,
> with your over the years comment. You are not looking at this logically and
> not only it is without logic it is done so with a broad brush w/ largely
> making assumptions, because it is enough to convince the narrative that is
> clearly far left.

Bragg is a prosecutor. When someone commits a crimes(s) the prosecutor may lay charges. That is where we are. There is nothing to be surprised about.

A judge or jury will decide guilt or innocence based on the evidence provided to them in court.

>> > The judge on the case has donated funds to Biden and even the judges own
>> > daughter has worked for the Kamala Harris. All true..
>>
>> It might be, but there is nothing wrong with donating to Biden or the
>> judges daughter working for Kamala Harris.
>>
>> Unless it is some sort of conspiracy. Is that what you are suggesting?

> Merchan, the judge overseeing the case that had Trump indicted over the
> payment of hush money to adult film star Stormy Daniels during his 2016
> presidential campaign, has a 34-year-old daughter, Loren, who has a history
> of working for Democratic politicians including Vice President Kamala Harris
> and California Representative Adam Schiff.

Is there a crime by the judge or his daughter in any of the above?

> Merchan has donated to the onetime and potential future political opponent
> of defendant now facing a trial in his courtroom.

> The donations are likely to continue to fuel Trump's criticism of the judge
> and his family, whom he has accused of being biased against him (Trump and
> his family have also criticized Merchan's daughter for her work for then-Sen.
> Kamala Harris's presidential bid and subsequently for the Biden-Harris
> presidential ticket).

I guess Trump only likes donations when they are headed his way.

> The donations were unwise as a matter of appearance, said Chuck Rosenberg, an
> NBC News legal analyst and a former federal prosecutor.
> But appearances matter.

There is no crime in these donations and there is no crime in "working for Democartat" politicians.

>> The Donald Trump era is a sad part of American history.
> You are of course entitled to your opinion.
> USMCA.. Yeah, that was Trump who did that, perhaps this is what I mean, when

Trump did nothing. Why do you bring up USMCA?

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6
 * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)