Subj : Re: It is what it is
To   : Dale Shipp
From : Gregory Deyss
Date : Wed Aug 12 2020 02:08 pm

On 12 Aug 2020, Dale Shipp said the following...

 DS> You need to develop some sources that tell the truth.  It is well known
 DS> that is not Trump.

Trump is the President even when people like you said he would never be the
President. It is the lame street media who twists his words and take things
out of context and they this deliberately, to plant the seed into the weak
minded, who can not think for themselves.

 DS> Your definition is correct for the word that I meant to type,
 DS> tantamount, and I meant the usage of the term vendetta. You seem to be
 DS> justifying punishing people for what they might have done in the past.

Even that word of tantamount does not mean Vendetta. 
the correct definition of the of the word of tantamount is equivalent in
seriousness; to virtually the same as or as good as. 
There is no connection to the word Vendetta whatsoever. 

 DS> Where did you see that he was on parole at the time of the incident?

I did not see any such evidence that Mr. Floyd was in violation any such
parole, but can you think of another reason as to why he did not want to be
arrested. So what your arrested, have your day in court, and live another day.

 DS> I saw what you posted on network news, CNN, MSMBC and FoxNews.  What are
 DS> you trying to intimidate?
 
Intimidate? (interesting pause) or did you mean to say indicate. 

I wouldn't think the lame street media would ever show these images. 

 DS> No, it does not look like a few people, nor have I previously said that.
 DS> I will admit that there was an immediate uprising triggered by pent up
 DS> anger that resulting in many people committing acts of violence and
 DS> causing great damage.  While I can sort of understand their frustration,
 DS> I by no means condone their actions.  If found, they should be charged
 DS> and prosecuted.

Oh yes you did many times in-fact, you have stated that the carnage or
whatever it is that happening is not the result of BLM you went on to make it
sound that these people were not bad and these few instigators or as if to
suggest that these are actions of a few.

At the very least that is how you made it sound. 
Remember Dale,  what you have said previously, is on record; here in fidoland.

DS> Nor can they be the justification 
DS> for the type of violent treatment that has been meted out to the 
DS> protest crowds in some situations, e.g. Lafayette Square.

I will tell you why exactly with what happened at Lafayette Square. 
The number one job of the Secret Service is to protect the President. 

We all know (well, most of us) know what slime these protesters are. if you
are not sure or don't agree with that analysis all you need to is look at the
look at the protests at Minnesota
look at the protests at Oregon
look at the protests at New York
look at the protests at Ohio
These protesters are are quite volatile and violent.       

How proud would they be if they took out the President of the United States
of America, it would marked as quite the accomplishment by any number of the
organizations that spread hate as it's foundation.

DS> GD> Many Business owners have lost everything now that those buildings 
DS> GD> have been reduced to rubble. 

 DS> And they deserve to be compensated for their loss.

Do you know how insurance works beyond inner workings of your mind?

Premium Rates go up way up. 
Business move out of the neighborhoods because they have lost the confidence
because there once stood a gleaming building that has been reduced to a pile
of rubble. These democratic cities did nothing to protect their lively-hood.
Where were the cops that would of prevented this? 
The Police / Firefighters were told to stand down as a direct result of
that action these businesses were burned to the ground.