Subj : Re: Nice
To   : Gregory Deyss
From : Dan Cross
Date : Sat Apr 11 2020 09:45 am

On 09 Apr 2020 at 06:31p, Gregory Deyss pondered and said...
 
 GD> On 10 Apr 2020, Dan Cross said the following...
 GD>  
 GD>  DC> Your assertion that she might have suffered further or died
 GD>  DC> had she _not_ taken that drug similarly: there's no evidence
 GD>  DC> for that.
 GD> 
 GD> It is logical to assume that she has recovered because of the drug, the
 GD> woman even gave credit for Trump sounding off about this drug and she
 GD> continued to go so far and suggest if it was not for Trump talking about
 GD> this, she would of never known about it.

No it's not.

 GD> Where as your assertion is not remotely logical, which is, she would of
 GD> gotten better all by herself by doing nothing. It is ludicrous to even
 GD> debate with me over this. We have all seen that this virus is a beast
 GD> that kills, as it has already killed thousands, but there you sit smug
 GD> and determined to be right. I did not say these things, this is what the
 GD> woman has declared. I know that burns your ass so badly you can hardly
 GD> wait to respond, of which is very ignorant.

Yes, it kills; indiscriminately even.  But between 1%
and 3% of those who contract it.

But there's no evidence that hydroxychloroquine is an
effective treatment for it.  If you have actual evidence,
by all means share it.  If it's _actual_ evidence and
it's been verified, I'll admit I'm wrong.

But you really display your ignorance and lack of
ability to think logically here.  Nice try at
deflection, but it didn't work.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/03/29 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (3:770/100)