Subj : Obstruction once more
To   : DALE SHIPP
From : TIM RICHARDSON
Date : Sat Sep 07 2019 02:22 pm

On 09-02-19, DALE SHIPP said to TIM RICHARDSON:

-=> On 09-01-19  14:29,  Tim Richardson <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tulsi in Chief <=-

DS>  GD> Robert Mueller testified under oath that his investigation was not
DS>  GD> obstructed, yet the Democrats want to impeach
DS>  GD> Trump for obstructing a
DS>  GD> investigation that ""the lead investigator said was not
DS>obstructed."" TR>
DS>***********************************************************************
TR> ****

DS> Attempts to Obstruct do not have to be successful to be a crime.


TR> There was no *obstruction*! Therefore...there is no `crime'!


DS>You are coming rather late to this discussion, and it seems that you
DS>cannot read either.


I `read' fine.


I have copies of BOTH parts of Meuller's `report' (to be charitable, we'll
compassionately refer to it as `Meuller's report'; although listening to
Meuller testifying about it (if you could call what he did `testifying') its
VERY obvious he really knows little or nothing about it), and nowhere in
either part of it is there ANY accusation or evidence presented that `Trump'
or his campaign group `colluded' with Russians to alter/influence/change or
otherwise do ANYTHING to alter the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.


If there was a smidgeon of evidence to back such wild-ass charges we would not
now be discussing this....the `impeachment' would have already happened and
the Senate would be holding a trial presided over by the Chief Justice of the
US Supreme Court!


There was none....it didn't....and we aren't!


Hillary Clinton lost the election! You lefties are gonna have to wrap your
mind around that and move on!

---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)