proxy70

Race

All races of men, however different, are to coexist in [1]love and
[2]peace.

Races of people are very large, [3]fuzzy, loosely defined groups
([4]clusters) of people who are genetically similar because they come from
the same ancestors. Races usually significantly differ by their look and
in physical, mental and cultural aspects; some races are physically more
fit, some are more intelligent, some are better evolved for living in
specific climate conditions and so on, some races are so distinct that
some could even consider them a different species altogether -- races make
mankind very diverse; sadly they are also often a basis of [5]identity
[6]fascism too (similarly to how e.g. gender is the basis of [7]LGBT
fascism). The topic of human race is nowadays forbidden to be critically
discussed and researched (and even to be [8]joked about) due to the
political reign of [9]pseudoleft which denies existence of human races and
aggressively [10]censors and attacks any disagreement, however there
exists a number of undeniable old research, information hidden in the
underground and book that haven't yet been burned, and many things about
human races are simply completely obvious to those don't let themselves be
blinded by the immensely powerful propaganda. [11]Good society, unlike for
example our current competitive [12]capitalist society, acknowledges the
differences between human races and lets them coexist peacefully, without
[13]competition and in social equality despite their differences and
without any need for [14]bullshit such as [15]political correctness and
biology denialism.

Human races are real and have great biological significance, but that is
fine, [16]LRS advocates for universal love among all living beings. Don't
let the concept of race divide us, all people have to unite and live in
peace. Problems of society aren't caused by races but by the [17]system
that makes us compete and hate each other. Love all people. Together we
can remove the harmful system.

Instead of the word race the politically correct camp uses words such as
ethnicity -- it's funny, sometimes they say no such thing as race exists
but other times they simply have to operate with the fact that people are
genetically diverse, e.g. when they accuse others of [18]racism or point
out statistics that benefit them ("black people are paid less!"), as
existence of discrimination based on differences between people
necessarily implies the existence of differences between people -- so here
they try to substitute the word race for a different word so as to make
their self-contradiction less obvious. Anyway, it doesn't [19]work :)
Races indeed do exit, no matter what we call them.

Race can be told from the shape of the skull and one's [20]DNA, which
finds use e.g. in forensics to help solve crimes. It is officially called
the ancestry estimation. Some idiots say this should be forbidden to do
because it's "racist" lmao. Besides the obvious visual difference such as
skin [21]color races also have completely measurable differences
acknowledged even by modern "science", for example unlike other races
about 90% of Asians have dry earwax, Asians also have highest bone
density, Huaorani tribe has flat feet, blood type distributions are wildly
different between races as well as blood pressure and also heart rate,
people near the equator have measurably smaller eyeballs than those very
far north, even distribution of genes associated with specific behavior
was measured to differ between races. Similar absolutely measurable
differences exist in height, body odor, alcohol and lactose tolerance,
high altitude tolerance, vulnerability to specific diseases, hair
structure, cold tolerance, risk of obesity, behavior (see e.g. the
infamous [22]chimp out behavior of black people) and others. It is known
for a fact that Sherpas are greatly accustomed to living in high
altitudes, that's why they work as helpers for people climbing mt.
Everest, they can just do it much easier than other races. While dryness
of earwax is really a minor curiosity, it is completely unreasonable to
believe that race differences stop at traits we humans find
"controversial" and that genetics somehow magically avoids affecting
traits that are harder to measure and which our current society deems
politically incorrect to exist. In fact differences in important areas
such as intelligence were measured very well -- these are however either
censored or declared incorrect and "debunked" by unquestionable "science"
authorities, because politics.

{ Lol take a look at this :D
https://ia903400.us.archive.org/17/items/7f-082683f-04f-9d-4e-48c-1bf-169b-809510885021b-102c-55871ab-102f-7c-6650b-28f/7f082683f04f9d4e48c1bf169b809510885021b102c55871ab102f7c6650b28f.jpg.
~drummyfish }

[23]Fun fact: according to the Guinness World Record Book the tallest race
are probably Tutsi whose men are on average 185 cm tall. The shortest
seems to be the negroid group Onge with only few reaching over 140 cm.

{ Curiosity: in the past there was a research of the specific smell of
Jews -- whether Jews do have a specific smell distinguishable by humans
may be highly debatable, but it's funny -- one guy tried to start eating
like a Jew to see if he would also start to smell like one :D Source book:
Race Differences from 1935. ~drummyfish }

Pseudoleft uses cheap, logically faulty arguments to deny the existence of
race; for example that there are no clear objective boundaries between
races -- of course there are not, but how does that imply nonexistence of
race? The same argument could also be given even e.g. for the term species
(see e.g. ring species in which the boundaries are not clear) so as to
invalidate it; yet we see no one doubting the existence of various species
of animals. That's like saying that color doesn't exist because given any
two distinct colors there exists a gradual transition, or that [24]music
and noise are the same thing because objectively no clear line can be
drawn between them. If by this argument races don't exist, then movie
genres, psychological disorders, emotions or political opinions also don't
exist.

The politically correct camp further argues that there wasn't enough time
for human races to develop significant differences as evolution operates
on scales of millions of years while the evolution of modern humans was
taking part about in an order of magnitude smaller time scale (but of
course they won't have any objections to articles that claim that e.g.
[25]women are "catching up" to men in brain size in span of mere years).
However it has been shown that evolution can be extremely fast and make
great changes in mere DECADES, e.g. in cases of rapid environment change
(shown e.g. in a documentary Laws of the Lizard on anoles that show signs
of evolutionary change only after 14 years, also see e.g. the book The
10,000 Year Explosion talking about actual acceleration of human
evolution) and interbreeding with other (sub)species (e.g. Denisovan or
Neanderthals, which European population bred with but African population
didn't), which did occur when humans spread around the world and had to
live in vastly different conditions -- successful civilizations themselves
actually furthermore started to rapidly change their environment to
something that favors very different traits. It has for example been found
that average male brain increased from 1372 gram in 1860 to 1424 grams in
1940, a very significant change in LESS THAN A CENTURY. We can take a look
at the enormous differences between dog breeds which have been bred mostly
during only the last 200 years and whose differences are enormous and not
only physical, but also that of intelligence and temperament -- yes, the
breeding of dogs has been selective, but a rapid change in environment may
have a similar accelerating effect, and the process in humans still took
many tens of thousands of years. For example races of slaves were probably
selectively bred, even if unintentionally, as physically fit slaves were
more likely to survive than those who were smart; similarly in prospering
civilizations, e.g. that of Europe, where trade, business and development
of technology (e.g. military) became more crucial for survival than in
primitive desert or jungle civilizations, different traits such as
intelligence became preferred by evolution.

Another pseudoleftist argument is that "the DNA of any two individuals is
99.6 % identical so the differences are really insignificant". Now
consider that DNA of a pig is 98 % identical to human. We see the argument
is like saying a strawberry and beer is practically the same thing as they
are both about 93 % water. It is known that only a minuscule part of DNA
has any actual biological effect, only a small part is important and
therefore including all the unimportant junk in judging similarity is just
purposeful attempt at misleading statistics.

In general the politically correct love to pick and attack strawmen:
typically they will find some lunatic racial supremacist such as
[26]Hitler who claims something like "My German race is the purest, it has
no Jewish blood in it!", then they easily [27]attack this obvious nonsense
by saying "ACKCHUALY, studies show that Germans are mostly of mixed
ethnicity and have a lot of Jewish blood.^[123456789101112131415]" (which
is of course probably true), and then they go on (and here comes the
sneaky step), "therefore the whole premise about existence of races is
false." A retard will buy this of course because the sentence has a lot of
those superscript numbers in it. They cannot refute actual arguments that
aren't based on racial supremacy, arguments made by true scientists --
these they just ban and censor as "[28]racist".

The "race is a social construct" argument is perhaps the absolutely most
cretinous and idiotic ever given, it's almost so stupid as to not even be
worth addressing -- this one is the kind of "not even wrong", just
completely irrelevant and stupid to such a degree you can't but just shake
your head. What the FUCK is a "social construct" supposed to mean in the
first place, and how is it relevant? Does it mean that race is an abstract
concept made by humans? Well yes, but so is physics, species and whole
biology, governments, mathematics, colors, numbers, engineering and a
million of other things. Does it mean these things don't exist or that
they have no significance? Are you completely braindead or what?

Denying the facts regarding human race is called [29]race denialism, the
acceptance of these facts is called [30]race realism. Race denialism is
part of the basis of today's [31]pseudoleftist political ideology,
theories such as polygenism (multiregional hypothesis) are forbidden to be
supported and they're ridiculed and demonized by mainstream information
sources like [32]Wikipedia who only promote the [33]politically correct
"out of Africa" theory. [34]SJWs reject any idea of a race with the same
religious fanaticism with which Christian fanatics opposed Darwin's
evolution theory.

What races are there? That depends on definitions^([according to
who?][according to logic]), the boundaries between races are [35]fuzzy and
the lines can be drawn differently. The traditional, most general division
still found in the greatest 1990s encyclopedias is to three large groups:
Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black) and Mongoloid (yellow). These can be
further subdivided. Some go as far as calling different nations separate
races (e.g. the Norwegian race, Russian race etc.), thought that may be a
bit of a stretch. One of the first scientific divisions of people into
races was done by Francois Bernier in New Division of the Earth by the
Different Species or "Races" of Man that Inhabit It into Europeans,
Asians, Africans and Sami (north Europe), based on skin color, hair color,
height and shape of face, nose and eyes.

There is a controversial 1994 book called The Bell Curve that deals with
differences in intelligence between races (later followed by other books
such as The Global Bell Curve trying to examine the situation world-wide).
[36]SJWs indeed tried to attack it, however international experts on
intelligence agree the book is correct in saying average intelligence
between races differs (see e.g. [37]The Wall Street Journal's Mainstream
Science on Intelligence). Online resources with a lot of information on
racial differences are e.g. https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs
and http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/,
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_morphology etc. Note that even if
some particular resource may be fascist, biased and contain propaganda of
its own, it may likely give you information the pseudoleftist mainstream
such as [38]Wikipedia and [39]Google simply [40]censor -- while we may of
course not approve of the politics/opinions/goals/etc. of some we link to,
we still link to them to provide access to censored information so that
one can seek truth and form his own opinions.

If you want a relatively objective view on races, read old (pre 1950)
books. In the past people weren't yet brainwashed in this area, truth
could be spoken clearly, everyone knew races existed and that
acknowledging this doesn't at all imply [41]racism -- even such
personalities as H. G. Wells who in his Short History of the World draws a
nice, detailed tree of human races, alongside which he also warns against
adopting (real) racism. Also see for example the article on NEGRO in 11th
edition of Encyclopedia Britannica (1911), which clearly states on page
344 of the 19th volume that "mentally the negro is inferior to the white"
and continues to cite thorough study of this, finding that black children
were quite intelligent but with adulthood the intellect always went down,
however it states that negro has e.g. better sense of vision and hearing.
Even in the 90s still the uncensored information on race was still
available in the mainstream sources, e.g. the 1995 Desk Reference
Encyclopedia and 1993 Columbia Encyclopedia still have articles on races
and their differences. Other books on races (which you can find e.g. on
the Internet Archive) include e.g. Race Differences (1935, Klineberg) and
Races of Man (a huge book from 1900, by Deniker).

{ Another curiosity: many old books argue that the black race is in many
aspects NOT the one closest to apes and they make many good points, for
example body hair (blacks have none, whites have a lot), hair structure
(again white's hair structure is closer to apes) or lips (apes don't have
big lips while black races have the bigger lips). ~drummyfish }

{ Lol, the 1917 book The Circle of Knowledge has a detailed table
comparing various races physically and mentally, stating things like
"negro: slight mental development after puberty" etc. Encyclopedia
Americana (1918) also mentions a detailed description of the negro,
mentioning things such as much lower brain weight, prolonged arms,
distinct odor and a lower face angle. ~drummyfish }

It is useful to know the differences in intellect between different races
(no matter whether the cause is genetic, cultural or other), though
cultural and other traits linked to races may also play a big role. Of
course, it is important to keep in mind intelligence isn't one
dimensional, it's one of the most complex and complicated concepts we can
be dealing with (remember the famous test that revealed that chimpanzees
greatly outperform humans at certain intellectual tasks such as
remembering the order of numbers seen for a very short period of time) and
that other traits than raw intelligence may be equally or more important
for good performance in intellectual tasks, e.g. personality traits such
as curiosity (imagine a fast CPU running shit software versus slower CPU
running good software). We can't generally simplify to a single measure
such as [42]IQ score (though it can still give some rough ideas, IQ is not
absolutely useless), but we can measure performance at different tasks.
Let intelligence here mean simply the ability to perform well in the area
of given art. And of course, there are smart and stupid people in any
race, the general statements we make are just about statistics and
probabilities.

The smartest races seem to be [43]Jews and [44]Asians (also found so by
the book Bell Curve and many old books). Asians have always been regarded
as having superior intelligence and their [45]religions and [46]culture
also seem to be the most advanced, with very complex ideas (as opposed to
e.g. Christianity based on trivial rules to blindly follow), closest to
[47]nonviolence, [48]socialism and true [49]science (e.g. [50]Buddhism).
There is no question about the intelligence of Jews, the greatest thinkers
of all times were Jewish ([51]Richard Stallman, [52]Einstein, [53]Marx,
Freud, [54]Chomsky, even [55]Jesus and others) -- the man often regarded
as the smartest human in history, William James Sidis, was a Jew. Jews
have dominated despite being a minority, they seem to have a very creative
intelligence and some of them decide to gain further edge by giving up
their morality (i.e. becoming [56]capitalist), while Asians are more
disciplined and mechanically inclined -- they can learn a skill and bring
it to perfection with an extremely deep study and dedication (funnily this
observation was also shared e.g. by Grubby, a Warcraft III legend pro
player, on a stream ranking Orc units, where he contrasted the Asian
mechanical genius with European creative thinking, swiftly realizing the
politically incorrect slip and playing it to the out). Closely following
is the general white race (which according to studies is also seen as most
physically attractive by all races): white people have of course
absolutely dominated history and there is always that one white guy at the
top even in areas more dominated by other races (e.g. Eminem in rap,
Carlsen in chess, Grubby in Warcraft 3, ...), however whites are still
primitive in many ways ([57]individualism, [58]fascism, violence, simple
religions and cults, e.g. that of economy, money, simplified commandments
of Christianity etc.). The African black race known as the negro is one of
the least intelligent according to basically all literature -- this makes
a lot of sense, the race has been oppressed and living in harsh conditions
for centuries and millennia and didn't get much chance to evolve towards
good performance in intellectual tasks, quite the opposite, those who were
physically fit rather than smart were probably more likely to survive and
reproduce as slaves or jungle people (even if white people split from the
blacks relatively recently, a rapid change in environment also leads to a
rapid change in evolution, even that of intelligence). However the more
primitive, less intelligent races (blacks, indians etc.) were found by
some to e.g. have significantly faster reaction times, which sometimes may
be an advantage -- this is suspected to be cause be a tradeoff; the
"smarter" races perform more complex processing of input information (in
terms of computers: having a longer processing [59]pipeline) and so it
takes longer, i.e. the more primitive individual acts more impulsively and
therefore quicker. The 1892 book Hereditary Genius says that the black
race is about two grades below the white race (nowadays the gap will most
likely be lower). Hispanics were found to perform somewhere in between the
white and black people. There isn't so much info about other races such as
the red race or Eskimos, but they're probably similarly intelligent to the
black race. The above mentioned book Hereditary Genius gives an
intelligence of the Australian aboriginal race at least one grade below
that of the negro, making possibly the dumbest race of all. The brown
races are kind of complicated, Indian people have Asian genes and showed a
great intellectual potential, e.g. in [60]chess, [61]math, philosophy
(nonviolence inherently connected to India is the most intellectually
advanced philosophy), and lately also [62]computer science (even though
many would argue that "[63]pajeets" are just trained coding monkeys,
really their compsci "universities" are mostly a meme); they may be at the
similar level to Hispanics.

Increasing multiculturalism, globalization and mixing of the races will
likely make all of this less and less relevant as time goes on -- races
will blend greatly which may either help get rid of true [64]racism, but
also fuel it: many will oppose racial mixing, many will become more
paranoid (as is already the case with Jews who are sometimes very hard to
tell apart from whites) and eventually pure races will actually become a
minority that may become target of reversed racism: a pale white guy in a
room full of mixed people will stand out and likely get lynched (if not
just for the fact of being different, then for social revenge). For now
the differences in races are still greatly visible.

[65]LRS philosophy is of course FOR multiculturalism and mixing of races
-- we just hope the situation won't escalate as described above.
Biodiversity is good.