Re: My favourite strange clocks
===============================

~ My favourite strange clocks ~eapl:
gemini://text.eapl.mx/my-favourite-strange-clocks

~ Re: My favourite strange clocks ~ew0k:
gemini://warmedal.se/~bjorn/posts/2022-01-11-re-my-favourite-strange-clocks.gmi

I have been meaning to reply to this one because it is a subject that
interests me. I have read about a variety of clocks and owned a couple
of unusual watches, along with a small collection more normal stuff
like a few Casio digitals, a G-Shock, a hand wound/mechanical and a
high precision quartz (+/-15 seconds a year, rather than a +/-20
seconds month, like most quartz).

Here is some more on a couple of my watches (largely quotes from my
other posts) and some thoughts on an older method of tracking time and
how it can still be useful in the modern world.

Binary wristwatch
-----------------

I am wearing a binary watch as I write this. It is also BCD but
encoded slightly different than the ones that eapl linked to.

~ How to read the Binary-coded decimal (BCD):
http://www.glassgiant.com/geek/binaryclock/graphics/binclock_sample.gif

In the first linked image from eapl's post there are six columns,
representing each of the 6 individual decimal digits in a time like
12:00:00 and every decimal digit of this six is encoded separately. In
mine the hours are as encoded as one binary number and the minutes as
another. As such my watch has two rows, rather than 6 columns.

~ Binary wrist watch:
gopher://sdf.org/0/users/r0/phlog/2021-11-23_Binary_wrist_watch.txt

 ``
  A couple of weeks back I bought a binary watch (well... BCD-binary
  coded decimal) on on whim. It was cheap and ugly but I figured it
  would be kind of fun to test myself a little. A quick mental puzzle
  whenever I want to know the time. :D

  Interestingly, while telling the time was somewhat cumbersome at
  first, it is rapidly getting easier. I have realised that I am
  starting to simply memorise quite a few positions, so that I can
  often read the time at a glance. I have also begun to notice
  patterns I had not really thought about or considered before wearing
  a watch like this [...]


"Slow watch"
------------

ew0k wrote:

 ``
  It made me remember "Slow Watches"; a brand that makes watches with
  a face numbered 1-24 and only the one hand moving one lap every 24
  hours. The markings on the clock face have a precision of 15
  minutes, making it a little hard to estimate the time on the minute.


I have one of those myself and used it almost continuously for a year
and then on and off for different periods since then. When I
eventually get around to changing the battery I might start using it
again.

Just noticing when it is directly between two markers will get you
down to roughy 7 1/2 minute precision and in reality, unless you are
long sighted, you can do a little better and get within 5 minutes. But
then you are really staring at it and not just glancing at it, which
perhaps goes against the point.

I actually mentioned this watch in my post about simple things.

~ Because it's simple!:
gopher://sdf.org/0/users/r0/phlog/2022-01-06_Because_its_simple.txt

 ``
  "Why do you own a watch with a single hand?"

  [...]

  Because it is simple!

  [...]

  The watch in question has a single hand that moves one revolution
  over 24 hours. Even a young child who does not understand numbers,
  gets it.


Despite the lack of precision the watch is perfectly good for the main
purposes of a watch: seeing where you are in a day; being on time for
anything that happens on 00, 15, 30, and 45 minutes past the hour.
Which if you think about it, is actually the vast majority of things.
In fact the inability to see the exact minute means you tend to turn
up a little early for things (just in case), which is actually kind of
nice.

When you need a different, specific time, e.g. while waiting for
public transport or timing things on a short scale, it is obviously
less good but for those I would just pull out my phone or look at a
different clock. Another nice use is when explaining the passage of a
day to a young child. Initially they are confused (because it doesn't
seem to move) but you can easily explain that different positions
always correspond with different parts of the day, like breakfast or
lunch. That is also true with a normal, watch with an analog interface
but it is much clearer on this watch because there is no repetition
(e.g. the 7 position on a normal watch could be morning/breakfast or
bedtime). Having only one hand also greatly helps understanding
because kids can mix these up. They also do not need to be able to
read the number to get the concept, just understand the position. Even
as an adult seeing the passage of the day like this is nice. Giving
you a nice visual, like a pie chart or perhaps more accurately a
sundial. If the hand points down it is night, to the left morning, top
midday, right evening.

Hour glasses
------------

An additional, nice, visual method for keeping track of time that
*does* work for the shorter timescales, when you need to keep track of
an hour or less, is an "hour" glass (though they also sell them in
other intervals e.g. 30, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1 minutes). I have also written
about these previously in my journal.

~ My journal [Section] 2022-01-07 14:58:
gopher://sdf.org/0/users/r0/journal.txt

 ``
  Another simple thing that I like are hour glasses. I own a few. They
  were particularly great when explaining to my kids how long
  something was (in terms of time). For example I would flip one
  exactly one hour before their bed time, and then explain that when
  it finished it would be time to go to sleep. This is [very] useful
  in Norway, where in the summer it stays bright for a long time. A
  ten minute one is also useful when saying how much more "screen
  time" they have left or when preparing them for how long until "we
  leave for X".

  While the kids have largely outgrown the need for this type of
  visual explanation of time, my youngest often still talks about
  stuff in terms of how many "big hour glasses", rather than just
  hours. XD Anyway, if you have small kids I recommend them. They are
  both simple and "easy to use". Also handy for adults who want to
  time things (e.g. cooking) without the annoying ring. Just remember
  to look at them (and flip them) from time to time. Well... unless
  you like burnt stuff!

  If you do buy one, do not buy something overly cheap and double
  check that is close to the rated duration (if not your should
  probably return it). I do have one "10 minute" hour glass that is
  actually around 7 1/2 minutes. A little variation is too be expected
  (none are super precise) but that IMHO is too much.


* * *