COSMOS 
By Carl Sagan 
_____________

The story of fifteen billion years of cosmic evolution transforming matter and life into  consciousness, of how science and civilization grew up together, and of the forces and  individuals who helped shape modern science. A story told with Carl Sagan.s remarkable  ability to make scientific ideas both comprehensible and exciting, based on his acclaimed  television series.



For Ann Druyan

In the vastness of space and the immensity of time, it is my joy to share a planet and an epoch with Annie

Carl Sagan was the Director of the Laboratory for Planetary studies and David Duncan  Professor of Astronomy and Space Sciences at Cornell University. He played a leading role in  the Mariner, Viking and Voyager expeditions to the planets, for which he received the NASA  medals for Exceptional Scientific Achievement and for Distinguished Public Service, and the  international astronautics prize, the Prix Galabert.

He served as Chairman of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical  Society, as Chairman of the Astronomy Section of the American Association for the  Advancement of Science, and as President of the Planetology Section of the American  Geophysical Union. For twelve years, he was Editor-in-Chief of Icarus, the leading  professional journal devoted to planetary research. In addition to four hundred published  scientific and popular articles, Dr Sagan was the author, co-author or editor of more than a  dozen books, including Intelligent Life in the Universe, The Cosmic Connection, The Dragons  of Eden, Murmurs of Earth, Broca.s Brain and the bestselling science fiction novel, Contact.

He was a recipient of the Joseph Priestly Award .for distinguished contributions to the  welfare of mankind., and the Pulitzer Prize for literature.

Carl Sagan died in December 1996.

CARL SAGAN

Cosmos



 CONTENTS

 

Introduction

1	The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean

2	One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue

3	The Harmony of Worlds

4	Heaven and Hell

5	Blues for a Red Planet

6	Travelers. Tales

7	The Backbone of Night

8	Travels in Space and Time

9	The Lives of the Stars

10	The Edge of Forever

11	The Persistence of Memory

12	Encyclopaedia Galactica

13	Who Speaks for Earth?



Appendix 1: Reductio ad Absurdum and the Square Root of Two

Appendix 2: The Five Pythagorean Solids

INTRODUCTION

The time will come when diligent research over long periods will bring to light things which  now lie hidden. A single lifetime, even though entirely devoted to the sky, would not be  enough for the investigation of so vast a subject . . . And so this knowledge will be  unfolded only through long successive ages. There will come a time when our descendants will  be amazed that we did not know things that are so plain to them . . . Many discoveries are  reserved for ages still to come, when memory of us will have been effaced. Our universe is a  sorry little affair unless it has in it something for every age to investigate . . . Nature  does not reveal her mysteries once and for all. - Seneca, Natural Questions, Book 7, first century

In ancient times, in everyday speech and custom, the most mundane happenings were connected  with the grandest cosmic events. A charming example is an incantation against the worm which  the Assyrians of 1000 B.C. imagined to cause toothaches. It begins with the origin of the  universe and ends with a cure for toothache:

After Anu had created the heaven, 
And the heaven had created the earth, 
And the earth had created the rivers, 
And the rivers had created the canals, 
And the canals had created the morass, 
And the morass had created the worm, 
The worm went before Shamash, weeping, 
His tears flowing before Ea: 
.What wilt thou give me for my food, 
What wilt thou give me for my drink?. 
.I will give thee the dried fig 
And the apricot.. 
.What are these to me? 
The dried fig 
And the apricot! Lift me up, 
and among the teeth 
And the gums let me dwell! . . 
Because thou hast said this, O worm, 
May Ea smite thee with the might of 
His hand! 
(Incantation against toothache.)


Our ancestors were eager to understand the world but had not quite stumbled upon the  method. They imagined a small, quaint, tidy universe in which the dominant forces were gods  like Anu, Ea, and Shamash. In that universe humans played an important if not a central  role. We were intimately bound up with the rest of nature. The treatment of toothache with  second-rate beer was tied to the deepest cosmological mysteries. 

Today we have discovered a powerful and elegant way to understand the universe, a  method called science; it has revealed to us a universe so ancient and so vast that human  affairs seem at first sight to be of little consequence. We have grown distant from the  Cosmos. It has seemed remote and irrelevant to everyday concerns. But science has found not  only that the universe has a reeling and ecstatic grandeur, not only that it is accessible  to human understanding, but also that we are, in a very real and profound sense, a part of  that Cosmos, born from it, our fate deeply connected with it. The most basic human events  and the most trivial trace back to the universe and its origins. This book is devoted to the  exploration of that cosmic perspective.       In the summer and fall of 1976, as a member of the Viking Lander Imaging Flight Team,  I was engaged, with a hundred of my scientific colleagues, in the exploration of the planet  Mars. For the first time in human history we had landed two space vehicl
es on the surface of  another world. The results, described more fully in Chapter 5, were spectacular, the  historical significance of the mission utterly apparent. And yet the general public was  learning almost nothing of these great happenings. The press was largely inattentive;  television ignored the mission almost altogether. When it became clear that a definitive  answer on whether there is life on Mars would not be forthcoming, interest dwindled still  further. There was little tolerance for ambiguity. When we found the sky of Mars to be a  kind of pinkish-yellow rather than the blue which had erroneously first been reported, the  announcement was greeted by a chorus of good-natured boos from the assembled reporters -  they wanted Mars to be, even in this respect, like the Earth. They believed that their  audiences would be progressively disinterested as Mars was revealed to be less and less like  the Earth. And yet the Martian landscapes are staggering, the vistas breathtaking. I was  positive from 
my own experience that an enormous global interest exists in the exploration  of the planets and in many kindred scientific topics - the origin of life, the Earth, and  the Cosmos, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, our connection with the universe.  And I was certain that this interest could be excited through that most powerful  communications medium, television. 

My feelings were shared by B. Gentry Lee, the Viking Data Analysis and Mission  Planning Director, a man of extraordinary organizational abilities. We decided, gamely, to  do something about the problem ourselves. Lee proposed that we form a production company  devoted to the communication of science in an engaging and accessible way. In the following  months we were approached on a number of projects. But by far the most interesting was an  inquiry tendered by KCET, the Public Broadcasting Service.s outlet in Los Angeles.  Eventually, we jointly agreed to produce a thirteen-part television series oriented toward  astronomy but with a very broad human perspective. It was to be aimed at popular audiences,  to be visually and musically stunning, and to engage the heart as well as the mind. We  talked with underwriters, hired an executive producer, and found ourselves embarked on a  three-year project called Cosmos. At this writing it has an estimated worldwide audience of  140 million people, or 3 percent of t
he human population of the planet Earth. It is  dedicated to the proposition that the public is far more intelligent than it has generally  been given credit for; that the deepest scientific questions on the nature and origin of the  world excite the interests and passions of enormous numbers of people. The present epoch is  a major crossroads for our civilization and perhaps for our species. Whatever road we take,  our fate is indissolubly bound up with science. It is essential as a matter of simple  survival for us to understand science. In addition, science is a delight; evolution has  arranged that we take pleasure in understanding - those who understand are more likely to  survive. The Cosmos television series and this book represent a hopeful experiment in  communicating some of the ideas, methods and joys of science. 

The book and the television series evolved together. In some sense each is based on  the other. But books and television series have somewhat different audiences and admit  differing approaches. One of the great virtues of a book is that it is possible for the  reader to return repeatedly to obscure or difficult passages; this is only beginning to  become possible, with the development of videotape and video-disc technology, for  television. There is much more freedom for the author in choosing the range and depth of  topics for a chapter in a book than for the procrustean fifty-eight minutes, thirty seconds  of a noncommercial television program. This book goes more deeply into many topics than does  the television series. There are topics discussed in the book which are not treated in the  television series and vice versa. Explicit representations of the Cosmic Calendar, featured  in the television series, do not appear here - in part because the Cosmic Calendar is  discussed in my book The Dragons of Eden
; likewise, I do not here discuss the life of Robert  Goddard in much detail, because there is a chapter in Broca.s Brain devoted to him. But each  episode of the television series follows fairly closely the corresponding chapter of this  book; and I like to think that the pleasure of each will be enhanced by reference to the  other. 

For clarity, I have in a number of cases introduced an idea more than once - the  first time lightly, and with deeper passes on subsequent appearances. This occurs, for  example, in the introduction to cosmic objects in Chapter 1, which are examined in greater  detail later on; or in the discussion of mutations, enzymes and nucleic acids in Chapter 2.  In a few cases, concepts are presented out of historical order. For example, the ideas of  the ancient Greek scientists are presented in Chapter 7, well after the discussion of  Johannes Kepler in Chapter 3. But I believe an appreciation of the Greeks can best be  provided after we see what they barely missed achieving. 

Because science is inseparable from the rest of the human endeavor, it cannot be  discussed without making contact, sometimes glancing, sometimes head-on, with a number of  social, political, religious and philosophical issues. Even in the filming of a television  series on science, the worldwide devotion to military activities becomes intrusive.  Simulating the exploration of Mars in the Mohave Desert with a full-scale version of the  Viking Lander, we were repeatedly interrupted by the United States Air Force, performing  bombing runs in a nearby test range. In Alexandria, Egypt, from nine to eleven A.M. every  morning, our hotel was the subject of practice strafing runs by the Egyptian Air Force. In  Samos, Greece, permission to film anywhere was withheld until the very last moment because  of NATO maneuvers and what was clearly the construction of a warren of underground and  hillside emplacements for artillery and tanks. In Czechoslovakia the use of walkie-talkies  for organizing the filming logistics o
n a rural road attracted the attention of a Czech Air  Force fighter, which circled overhead until reassured in Czech that no threat to national  security was being perpetrated. In Greece, Egypt and Czechoslovakia our film crews were  accompanied everywhere by agents of the state security apparatus. Preliminary inquiries  about filming in Kaluga, U.S.S.R., for a proposed discussion of the life of the Russian  pioneer of astronautics Konstantin Tsiolkovsky were discouraged - because, as we later  discovered, trials of dissidents were to be conducted there. Our camera crews met  innumerable kindnesses in every country we visited; but the global military presence, the  fear in the hearts of the nations, was everywhere. The experience confirmed my resolve to  treat, when relevant, social questions both in the series and in the book. 

The essence of science is that it is self-correcting. New experimental results and  novel ideas are continually resolving old mysteries. For example, in Chapter 9 we discuss  the fact that the Sun seems to be generating too few of the elusive particles called  neutrinos. Some proposed explanations are listed. In Chapter 10 we wonder whether there is  enough matter in the universe eventually to stop the recession of distant galaxies, and  whether the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncreated. Some light on both these  questions may since have been cast in experiments by Frederick Reines, of the University of  California, who believes he has discovered (a) that neutrinos exist in three different  states, only one of which could be detected by neutrino telescopes studying the Sun; and (b)  that neutrinos - unlike light - have mass, so that the gravity of all the neutrinos in space  may help to close the Cosmos and prevent it from expanding forever. Future experiments will  show whether these ideas are 
correct. But they illustrate the continuing and vigorous  reassessment of received wisdom which is fundamental to the scientific enterprise. 

On a project of this magnitude it is impossible to thank everyone who has made a  contribution. However, I would like to acknowledge, especially, B. Gentry Lee; the Cosmos  production staff, including the senior producers Geoffrey Haines-Stiles and David Kennard  and the executive producer Adrian Malone; the artists Jon Lomberg (who played a critical  role in the original design and organization of the Cosmos visuals), John Allison, Adolf  Schaller, Rick Sternbach, Don Davies, Brown, and Anne Norcia; consultants Donald Goldsmith,  Owen Gingerich, Paul Fox, and Diane Ackerman; Cameron Beck; the KCET management,  particularly Greg Andorfer, who first carried KCET.s proposal to us, Chuck Allen, William  Lamb, and James Loper; and the underwriters and co-producers of the Cosmos television  series, including the Atlantic Richfield Company, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,  the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the British  Broadcasting Corporation, and Polytel International.
 Others who helped in clarifying matters  of fact or approach are listed at the back of the book. The final responsibility for the  content of the book is, however, of course mine. I thank the staff at Random House,  particularly my editor, Anne Freedgood, and the book designer, Robert Aulicino, for their  capable work and their patience when the deadlines for the television series and the book  seemed to be in conflict. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Shirley Arden, my Executive  Assistant, for typing the early drafts of this book and ushering the later drafts through  all stages of production with her usual cheerful competence. This is only one of many ways  in which the Cosmos project is deeply indebted to her. I am more grateful than I can say to  the administration of Cornell University for granting me a two-year leave of absence to  pursue this project, to my colleagues and students there, and to my colleagues at NASA, JPL  and on the Voyager Imaging Team. 

My greatest debt for the writing of Cosmos is owed to Ann Druyan and Steven Soter,  my co-writers in the television series. They made fundamental and frequent contributions to  the basic ideas and their connections, to the overall intellectual structure of the  episodes, and to the felicity of style. I am deeply grateful for their vigorous critical  readings of early versions of this book, their constructive and creative suggestions for  revision through many drafts, and their major contributions to the television script which  in many ways influenced the content of this book. The delight I found in our many  discussions is one of my chief rewards from the Cosmos project. Ithaca and Los Angeles May 1980

CHAPTER I

The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean