"Life of Brian... have you seen Kumare?" my response: No I
   haven't but I will; I looked at the Wikipedia for it and it
   looks like something I *might* like. Although... I'm not
   ethically crazy about the idea of fooling people like that. The
   idea is actually kinda gross to me.... I don't like fooling
   people.... or watching it happen really. But.. I _should_ watch
   it I think. I have a feeling I'd feel awkward the whole time
   watching it though but I should watch it. === Oh wow, I just saw
   the trailer for it. Eek. I'm squeamish even thinking about
   watching it. I mean, it takes advantage of people's earnest and
   honest feelings. Trust is one of those things that we're in
   short supply of, and while everybody _should_ learn skepticism
   as a part of "watch out for charlatans.... taking -advantage- of
   it... for whatever reason (making a film that will win awards..
   making $$$, selling books).. it's just... wow.. I don't honestly
   know if I *could* watch it. I know I wouldn't be rooting for the
   guy that made it already. It's exploitation and saying "it's for
   a documentary" or "it's for science" is no better than "I'm
   doing it for profit".... ... ugh, well, I _should_ watch it I
   think but it highlights exactly the reason why I don't get a
   custom made robe and stand up in front of people. I know it's
   easy. I could do it without a fake Indian accent.... known that
   since I was a teenager and people said I should be a minister...
   ... that's why I couldn't do it. I couldn't. === wow... that
   Kumare thing definitely struck at one of my core values...
   ouch... there it is. == I might have to fast forward through it
   to get to it. So weird: VERY few things make me squeamish. I can
   handle blood, vomit, random disgusting things. I can watch any
   kind of special fx (as long as I know it's special fx), no
   matter what it's portraying. None of that makes me squeamish.
   But exploiting ppl with a knowing wink and a grin? Yeah.. that
   hits me. == I do too - and I never got used to it. You'd think
   by 44 I'd be used to it. But it always bothered me. Like, I can
   handle the craziest people who earnestly believe something from
   top to bottom. I'm cool with that. But if the guy on the top or
   anyone in the hierarchy takes advantage of people's trust, it
   bothers me. For example, if Pat Robertson HONESTLY believes what
   he says, I got no problem with the 700 club and all the strange
   things they say/do. But if he doesn't? That changes things. Or
   one of my complaints with new atheism: those that honestly
   believe the people heading it, I don't fault them. But if
   someone who is influential is deliberately utilizing the
   fundamentalist style of convincing people simply because it
   psychologically works very well on a large segment of the
   population... well... that bothers me equally. I could give a
   dozen examples but the gist of it is: if you're in a position of
   power, you're responsible for people that look up to you.
   Knowingly toying with people's minds when you're responsible for
   them is, to me is high on the morally wrong scale for me. Some
   professions I can sort of accept, like advertising/marketing. I
   saw through them when I was 8 yrs old and I realized the kids
   were midgets, they were holding the toy truck RIGHT in front of
   the camera so it LOOKED bigger than it was, and yet I was amazed
   that I STILL WANTED IT, even seeing the scam. Never forgot that
   stupid toy truck commercial but I've seen echos of it through
   the years in all sorts of places. ==