You're justifying racism by blaming it on other people. Here:
   You showed a video twice that said "Morgan Freeman solves the
   race problem". Ok. He solved it. Don't bring up race as an issue
   and it stops being an issue. THEN you imply that 'they' are
   still talking about it, 'they' are continuing the racism, but
   what's missing here? Your own accountability. You continue to
   bring up race as an issue, talking phenotypes and such while
   wanting ONLY "people of color" to listen to Morgan Freeman but
   not yourself. Can you see why this looks like very strange
   behavior? == In the USA, there is a thing as race. In the USA
   there is a thing as white privilege. I suspect this is also an
   issue in some other countries as well. South Africa comes to
   mind. A few Western and Eastern European countries have issues
   with racism. I know Australia does as well. But I see each of
   these as distinct LOCAL issues, somewhat unique to each nation.
   Historically, people are more likely to be divided in OTHER
   ways. Religious alliance is one. Or what nation they come from.
   Their group alliances and such and most importantly, what Family
   line they come from. All more or less the same idea. I don't see
   race as a significant issue in world history until around the
   16th century, give or take. Anything before that, it's better to
   speak of national differences or religious alliance differences.
   So, in some contexts race does make a difference. In other
   contexts, such as "Was Plato White?" is nearly a meaningless
   question. = On computers, separated paragraphs look nicer. On
   phones, having a single paragraph for everything looks better. I
   like white-space. = Me, personally, I'm glad to be in the USA.
   I'm glad to be "American white". Male. 6' tall. Beard. Even
   glasses gives me a "nerd privilege": People listen to me when I
   talk because I have glasses and am an active listener, so people
   assume I'm smart and worth listening to. Silly fools. == Oddly,
   I like when I'm talking in a group and someone says, "What's he
   talking about?" and someone else replies, "Just let him finish.
   He does that." == I *personally* find the narrative of "white
   supremacy" being the reason for a number of historical events to
   be rather ridiculous. I tend to think in terms of nations and
   their actions against other nations. When I think of racism, I
   think of local problems. The US has a race problem unique to
   itself. The whole planet however, does not. Australia has a race
   problem unique to itself. The whole planet does not. Local
   issues. == If there is racism in China (I don't know if it does
   or not as I'm not well studied), it has unique particulars that
   make "Chinese racism" not equivalent to "American racism". In
   the USA for example, racism is typically structured among
   Americans vs Americans. Racism in Australia however, tends to be
   Australians who were put there or migrated from Britain
   primarily vs Asian immigrants. Or between historically placed
   (or migrated) British vs the Aboriginee peoples. We may call
   each of them "racism", but I don't think it's particularly
   meaningful to do so and globalize it. Each country has unique
   internal issues to itself with regards to a thing that happens
   to be called racism in each case, but, except for some broad
   spectrum commonalities like bigotry, they're not really
   equivalent. == The "four race split" via 19th century Science,
   for example, is not universal. It never was universal. It's
   accepted in a very few countries. Other countries have their own
   racial lines. == In the USA, there is a race problem. Everybody
   has stories to tell how they were either a victim or a
   perpetrator of it and usually both. It's not always about class
   separation, nor necessarily even primarily. However, it _could_
   be argued, in your favor, that public perception of racism is
   based UPON a perceived class separation that seems to follow
   color lines, which would place primacy to class separation, or
   at least pubic perception of it, over color lines... or at least
   place race and class separation in the same bucket of,
   "perceived differences", yet I think they'll still separate
   within that bucket like oil and water. Now that Ive said that,
   please admonish me for talking in circles. ===