For me, Harris too neat and tidy to make sense. Not nearly messy
   enough to be believable. But I understand his appeal. Ppl like
   simplification and he does a very good job at what he does. Of
   course then people follow up with that Australian dude....
   Singer? Sanger? I forget. Then I'm like.. ugh, really? but,
   personal preference here. Im not much for hero-worship. Yeah.
   he's great when he stays on his territory but like a lot of
   talking heads and book writers, he steps out of his territory
   and starts sounding kinda lame to everybody 'cept his followers.
   == Where he's good, he's good. I have a similar thing with the
   singularity dude with the keyboards and the google. Great up to
   a point... then I'm like... oh come on. Hawking disappointed me.
   Still like him but... yeah. 'nuff said there. Malcolm Gladwell
   broke my heart when I realized he was embellishing some simple
   things (after 2 or 3 books too) but damn he's a good writer.
   Heroes. They suck. Ppl who have heroes have my envy somewhat. ==
   yeah... stuff like that. Talk about cultural subjectivity. Yow.
   I mean, it's not that I don't subjectively generally agree with
   it in principle what he's saying there... but damn, it's an
   OPINION. Drives me nuts when ppl mix them up, especially
   otherwise smart dudes like him.