It *can* be, though. here is an example of an appropriate
   re-direction:

   Hamlet's tortured soul can be considered a response-dependent
   morality, subjective, not necessarily relativist but certainly
   anti-realist.

   His famous line:
   "*there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it
   so.*
   captures it well. From a moral realist standpoint of course,
   Hamlet's torture is inconsequential to morality. But to a moral
   anti-realist, quite consequential. No?

   This is why the post should remain, although a shift in language
   away from literature and psychology and towards philosophy is
   appropriate.

   Disagree?