I know and thank you for mentioning it. I'm not attempting to
   invalidate the systems. Not in the least.

   I just feel the need to bring the reminder forward sometimes as
   people _sometimes_ go a little off the deep end about the
   "realness" of mathematics.

   Max Tegmark.

   It's SO alluring, especially to regular people who FINALLY can
   sit back and relax that we've got it all figured out, or we soon
   will. But, to me, it amounts to a form of religious faith.

   That's the danger i see. It's taking 0.0001 and making it = 0,
   or taking 0.999993 and making it 1. It's useful, pragmatic,
   practical... but it can lead to erroneous thinking.

   I refer to this:
   [1]https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scenario/analogy.htm - I don't
   think you need it at all, but it's a good reminder to those
   perhaps with less awareness of the dangerous of analogy (and the
   entirety of our descriptions of the Universe are, at their root,
   analogies; that is the only way we *can* comprehend things, by
   comparing new information somehow to existing information and
   then laying out in detail where they differ).

   Our cognitive systems demand it.

   It's just easy to get lost in the wonder and perfection; again,
   not speaking of you in particular... but I've talked with some
   who get downright religious without being able to see it. I
   don't want to take away someone's faith in "what fills inthe
   gaps" but I suppose my quest is for one of accuracy but with
   respect.

References

   Visible links
   1. https://www.lhup.edu/%7Edsimanek/scenario/analogy.htm