In the end, there's not really a 'wrong' way to go about it.
   It's all to your level of patience. It's easy for me to say
   "just delete when bad msgs found"; but then again, I'm not the
   one dealing with it. I don't do much active moderation. I'm
   mostly a voice here.

   I have a high tolerance for bad behavior; let people rise or
   fall on their own merits and what not, and let the community
   decide.

   It's generally how I deal with bullying behaviors when I see
   them. I delete, delete, delete, and eventually they get bored
   and stop. But if I get tired of the delete, delete, delete
   routine, I give a warning. I allow them to test me a little
   further, delete delete delete, then I apologize for my hand
   being forced and then I ban them.

   Then I wait for the notes of appeal.

   If they genuinely want to be a member of the community, they
   will contact me.

   So, in the end, it sounds like our approaches are ultimately
   similar.
   I find most people can resolve issues on their own within the
   community itself. For example, if someone is being weird, like
   Jonnhy with the "I know who you really are" posts , wait for
   complaints. Deal with the complainer first and try to see if
   they can resolve it with the other person themselves.

   It's no different than dealing with children. Adults are no
   different than children.

   When you moderate a group, you're running a kindergarten. They
   are kids running around with scissors, getting paste on the
   floor, and getting into spats over toys.

   And then, you sometimes get the weird kid. Sometimes you get
   several.

   I was usually the weird kid