It's my contention that those who study metaphor consider the
   language of logic as metaphorical and within their domain and
   those who study logic consider the structure of metaphor to be
   within their domain. Systems perspective... which has its own
   logic and metaphorical ways as well. That is not to say that I
   know who is superior but I do know that it is possible to
   describe any system, at least in part, utilizing comparably
   powerful languages.

   We lack a plural You in English that's acceptable. "You all"
   "You's" "You guys" "Y'all". It sucks. In a sense, English is
   broken.

   But we have ways. "You all", "You's" "You guys" "Y'all" or
   simply using "You" as the rules proscribe and _hope_ that
   context fills in the missing plural/singular distinction.

   Other languages don't have that issue.

   Likewise, I may describe Logic utilizing Metaphor methodologies.
   You may describe Metaphors by Logical methodologies. You may say
   that the underpinning of Metaphorical language is Logic. I may
   say the underpinning of Logic is Metaphor.

   Both of us miss on the nuances of the other, discarding what
   doesn't fit as irrelevant, when it might be crucial to the
   other.

   This isn't to say I believe each are equally correct. Just that
   it happens.