Popper gave the authoritative answer that Science gives for the
   problem of induction.

   I consider modern science like this: A successful branch of
   Philosophy.

   Of their branch of Philosophy, Popper's formulation of an answer
   for the problem of induction is the one they choose to go with.

   To try to modify that, is, I believe, nearly unthinkable in
   Scientific circles, given that Falsifiability is such an
   integral part of their current processes.

   But in other branches of Philosophy, the problem of induction
   can have more answers than Poppers.

   That's what I mean.