It helps. It mirrors well some of the mystical writings from the
   Eastern Orthodox Desert Monks, which dove into this level, which
   the same amount of very precise distinctions between things that
   are often indiscriminately blended together.

   Or the Desert Monks mirror it. I doubt it's a cause/effect
   situation but more a consequence of reaching such levels through
   a great amount of training and copious amounts of reflection.

   I don't have any names to give you at present but in readings of
   the Philokalia years back, I recall something that is similar,
   although perhaps it is not.

   I disagree about the necessity to name. A concept can be shared
   without it having a name. "Is it relateable?" is enough for
   mutual understanding, although perhaps within Philosophy, if the
   words are the lowest elemental form, then perhaps it is
   impossible to philosophize without terminology, I don't know
   though.