My view on singularly consistent perspectives, vs me:
   [not that I'm unique - I am but mostly not tongue emoticon ]

   I grew up with computers. Programming since 11. 43 years old
   now. 32 years of being able to absolutely control a device so
   that it agrees with my whims entirely.

   Computers are consistent.

   Consistency among humans, to me, is the machinification of human
   thought... if that was a word. I'm sure there's a proper one.

   In short, I'm not impressed with logical consistency of
   arguments that work only within a certain conceptual framework.
   These traits are required for programming... but when I talk to
   people... I like to broaden things into areas that computers are
   likely to have more difficulty with at present. all that fancy
   talk for; I go in and out of context frequently but I always tie
   it together with a nice bow at the end, given enough time and
   space and audience tongue emoticon