Math has its limitations, as it is also a language, with its own
   grammar and rules.* The precision is quite handy though.* But we
   must not forget our roles; the calculations start with a
   hypothesis to be tested, which is set in human words, and the
   results are INTERPRETED with human words. Bad notions +
   excellent math = bad results. Mustn't put TOO much faith in
   mathematics alone. We risk the danger of focusing on the beauty
   and harmony of mathematical formulations and completely miss an
   awful hypothesis, a ridiculous conclusion, unspoken assumptions,
   and all sorts of things. This isn't taking away from your
   argument, just a reminder that mathematics is all too human
   because at the start and the end, its used as an expression for
   human wants and goals. Notice your message and the article.* It
   wasn't written in mathematics.* It was written in words ABOUT
   mathematics, written in an inspirational manner.* The math is
   not inspiring.* it is the human words describing mathematics
   that makes it inspiring. Also, our responses are not in
   mathematics.* They are also in human language of awe and wonder.