I usually start with the historical materialism perspective of
   the idea. A confluence of forces socioeconomically, so that any
   idea picks up associations like a piece of sticky candy. I teach
   students any ideology is a metanarrative and that their ideology
   is a matter of the historical materialism's impact on that idea
   fitting that logic system. Then we go into the critique using
   that all ideologies are meta narratives that have to marginalize
   any contrary ideas that don't fit the system as the other.
   Therefore, like you said Kenneth Udut-it's a matter of tracing
   the lineage of your logic system, but revealing it's own
   linguistic and abstract limitations due to it's construct as a
   system. ---- lol, I bet. I totally relate to what [1]Kenneth
   Udut is saying about idea sources. Maybe that is why I have
   taken my ideas and moved into fiction. I got frustrated
   realizing how often I was chasing in the footsteps of both
   classical and continental philosophers. Still haven't found that
   dang Odysseus poem.. But I will.

References

   Visible links
   1. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?hc_location=ufi