I think it's a matter of the lenses one sees through. In the
   realm of pure mathematics, Max has an amazing theory that is
   very appealing. I don't doubt that it *could* hold true. My main
   concern would be
   [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed-world_assumption -
   mathematics is a self-supporting, self-stabilizing system of
   thought and discourse. It is extraordinarily powerful at
   description; as powerful as other forms of language. In some
   ways, it is *more* powerful for its internal consistency, for
   one thing that is mathematical *will* support something else
   that is mathematical.

   The same thing cannot hold true for other languages, with looser
   constraints. Verbal language, musical language - they each have
   grammars and constraints that make them "what they are" - but
   they lack internal consistency to the incredible degree of
   mathematics.

   That being said.. it has no room for non-mathematical things. It
   has no room for inconsistencies in the same way that other
   languages have. That is its power and strength but also a
   potential weak point.

   My question is this: Can the map ever become the territory? Is
   it possible?

References

   Visible links
   1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed-world_assumption