But here's the question: What happens when the free grouping of
   individuals turns into shackles? And could the free grouping of
   individuals INCLUDE already established groupings of people,
   such as religion and government? The only distinction I can find
   is the newness of the grouping. Because a group, after it's been
   around for long enough, becomes established and it becomes the
   Enemy of new anarchistic groups that might wish to be formed:
   which is the flaw of anarchism - because anarchism is trying to
   bring GROUPS into anarchy - when anarchy itself does not have
   groupings of people - but rather anarchy is all about the
   individual.   You got it! And with anarchism * one of the
   strongest points * is you have the right to be wrong. You can
   even turn a wrong idea into the right idea in the minds of other
   people with Anarchism. (Anarchy on the other hand is
   individuals) But that's my trouble with it: The anarchism of
   right now * becomes "the establishment" of tomorrow. And the
   "hey we are victims "becomes "Look! They are the controllers and
   must be stopped" * But in the end * I am agreeing completely
   with what she is saying. I happen to understand it completely as
   well. Anarchism like democracy and communism And religion and
   atheism * Are rarely truly followed. In the end * anarchism
   simply describes the way things always were, are and always will
   be * because people are not robots * and never were. all 7
   billion people in the world follow anarchism. It is nothing
   special. But all 7 billion people in the world believe they are
   special - Even when they complain that they are not special.
   Even when they pretend to completely follow somebody else.
   Although that's more inner anarchy than anarchism. They don't.
   Because your mind Belongs to you, except in abusive families and
   other groups Where there is a charismatic leader who demands
   obedience Or you must incur their wrath. The groups with
   charismatic leadership * those are the things anarchism is
   trying to destroy. Politics, religion etc. Eh but I'm rambling.
   "Don't let anybody tell you who to listen to" is anarchism. And
   * the moment you listen to somebody who tells you not to listen
   to anybody * You become a follower - And not a free thinker.And
   I understand what you're saying Kimi * the group of freethinkers
   melting together is good for the group of freethinkers. But the
   group of freethinkers can easily become the oppressors and the
   religions and politics * All systems started off as a group of
   freethinkers melting together.   You become politics. You become
   a religion * the moment you have closed walls to your group
   Where one must conform to the group thinking or be removed. True
   anarchism is extremely rare