Employee Investment Capitalism would have succeeded if employees could have invested in their workplace. Not just stocks, but the working fund as well. If employees had been offered the opportunity to gain from their investment from the net profits they would have been more motivated to make the company work profitably. The faster a company turns over inventory the greater their profits, potentially. They're not going to make money if it costs more to operate than their sales so employees are motivated to maximize efficiency and profits if they're invested. As an example lets say a gas station has an account for buying gas that they sell to the public. They buy the gas wholesale, mark it up, and hopefully sell it for a profit after rent, utilities, supplies, labor, etc. have been paid. Suppose the account from which they bought the gas, and paid expenses, consisted of a fund where employees could contribute, like a savings account. Periodically, once a month or so, the profits, if they made any, would be put back into the fund with each employee gaining a percentage of the newly contributed profits based on the amount they had contributed to the fund previously. Imagine the motivation of an employee to make this fund grow if they'd invested as opposed to just collecting a paycheck. Loss to their fund value would motivate the employees even more to make the business work profitably. Unfortunately today's business model leaves employees without an invested interest in their workplace. It's to the employees best interest if the customer goes away, buys less inventory, and the employee will have less work to do. When an employee just collects a paycheck, profits, in reality, are just extra work. No matter how well intentioned a person is, sooner or later they have to give in to the laws of physics and prefer an easier life if they can get it. The retribution to business is far more devastating than we suppose. Employees slough off work, 'drag their feet', and even drive customers away in order to reduce their work load. The effects are devastating to the business and to the overall economy in a capitalistic system. Another advantage employees may experience, is if the fund is successful it may attract outside investors. A larger investment fund may mean lower costs on inventory thereby creating a greater opportunity for employees to create profits. The equation is more complicated, of course, but not much. The business owners, maybe with input from employees, will have to figure out a formula for disbursements of funds that work for their service inventory ratio. A gas station owner, for example, will tell you they don't make a profit on gas but rather the services they offer. Part of the reason direct employee investment hasn't transpired in our economy is that a small business start-up owner feels obligated to pay employees for their time while the business is starting to grow to a point where it can make a profit. He or she can't guarantee profits at start up, so it would be difficult to find people who wanted to work and loose money when the business first opens. Once the business is profitable, and most (95%) never make it to this point, the business owner would be making a personal compromise, a sacrifice, to include employees into the profit margin they worked so hard for and took the risk on. On the flip side, for employee investment again, if the investment plan could supplement outside investment, it may offer alternatives to bank loans or note selling. If the conditions set forth for the employee investment fund were similar to those of a bank loan, for example, then in reality, the employees may be taking an efficient short cut to collecting interest on their savings account via direct investment in the business and the business owner could save the expense of having a loan processed. Anyway you look at it, the economic fabric of capitalism would be much stronger if employees invested directly into their workplace. kbushnel.sdf-us.org/contact.html