23-Apr-1998 21:09:43 -0700,4534;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 21:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amdext.amd.com (amdext.amd.com [139.95.251.1]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:28:26 PDT
Received: from amdint.amd.com (amdint.amd.com [139.95.250.1])
	by amdext.amd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AMD) with ESMTP id JAA08864
	for <tops-20@panda.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dvorak.amd.com (dvorak.amd.com [163.181.10.9])
	by amdint.amd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AMD) with SMTP id JAA14997
	for <tops-20@panda.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dvorak.amd.com (4.1/AMDSN-1.18)
	id AA17461; Wed, 22 Apr 98 11:24:58 CDT
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 98 11:24:58 CDT
Message-Id: <9804221624.AA17461@dvorak.amd.com>
From: Clive Dawson <clive.dawson@amd.com>
To: tops-20@panda.com
Subject: Internet History


Hi folks,

I came across the following message in the TELECOM digest.  Anybody
on this list who remembers  what the transition to TCP/IP was like for
TOPS-20 might wish to get in touch with this person, since she is
requesting info for other operating systems besides Unix.

I recall some great war stories which appeared on this list back when
we were all struggling to bring up Kevin Paetzold's new code with
assorted patches and help from Bill Westfield and so many others who's
names continue to slowly fade...

Cheers,

Clive Dawson

P.S.  Does anybody have a pointer to the TOPS-20 mailing list archives?

----Forwarded message----

        From: rh120@sawasdee.columbia.edu (Ronda Hauben)
        Subject: From NCP to UNIX Based TCP/IP (ARPANET to Internet)
        Date: 20 Apr 1998 17:38:55 GMT
        Organization: Columbia University


        I am working on a paper for a survey of technology engineering
        class about the role that Usenet newsgroups and ARPANET mailing list 
        played in the period of transition from the IMP based NCP ARPANET 
        to the tcp/ip UNIX based ARPANET II (the virtual network) which 
        became the Internet. I am trying to study the role that the 
        communication played and how it was helpful in this transition. 
         
             Describing this transition, Vint Cerf wrote:
         
             "People participating in this transition of the ARPANET into 
             the internet environment are participating in an event as 
             exciting as the construction of the ARPANET and I am very 
             proud to be a part of it." 
         
         
             I am interested in the transition from NCP to tcp/ip which was
        distributed with the BSD UNIX distribution. 
         
             It would be helpful to have sources about the work done at 
        the University of California Berkeley on the improvement of UNIX 
        and the extensions to UNIX V7 to support networking and the 
        discussions and work around the transition to UNIX based tcp/ip for 
        the ARPANET nodes.
 
             Also I wondered if anyone has copies of the tcp/ip digest 
        mailing list after the January 18, 1982 issue and can make them 
        available. Earlier issues were both posted on Usenet and distributed
        as an ARPANET mailing list. I am also interested in the development
        of tcp/ip for other operating systems as part of this transition
        from the ARPANET to the Internet.
             
             I welcome suggestions of sources, papers etc. that may be 
        helpful in researching this period, and particularly on the role 
        that Net communication played in this transition. Also I would 
        be interested in email contact with Network pioneers who were 
        involved in this transition, accounts of the transition, etc..
         
             Thanks for any help with this.
         
        Ronda
        ronda@panix.com
         
         
             Other draft papers about the development of the Net and of 
         UNIX are online at 

               http://www.umcc.umich.edu/~ronda

                   Netizens: On the History and Impact
                        of Usenet and the Internet
                 http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook/
                and in print edition ISBN # 0-8186-7706-6

23-Apr-1998 21:14:36 -0700,4534;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 21:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amdext.amd.com (amdext.amd.com [139.95.251.1]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:28:26 PDT
Received: from amdint.amd.com (amdint.amd.com [139.95.250.1])
	by amdext.amd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AMD) with ESMTP id JAA08864
	for <tops-20@panda.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dvorak.amd.com (dvorak.amd.com [163.181.10.9])
	by amdint.amd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AMD) with SMTP id JAA14997
	for <tops-20@panda.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dvorak.amd.com (4.1/AMDSN-1.18)
	id AA17461; Wed, 22 Apr 98 11:24:58 CDT
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 98 11:24:58 CDT
Message-Id: <9804221624.AA17461@dvorak.amd.com>
From: Clive Dawson <clive.dawson@amd.com>
To: tops-20@panda.com
Subject: Internet History


Hi folks,

I came across the following message in the TELECOM digest.  Anybody
on this list who remembers  what the transition to TCP/IP was like for
TOPS-20 might wish to get in touch with this person, since she is
requesting info for other operating systems besides Unix.

I recall some great war stories which appeared on this list back when
we were all struggling to bring up Kevin Paetzold's new code with
assorted patches and help from Bill Westfield and so many others who's
names continue to slowly fade...

Cheers,

Clive Dawson

P.S.  Does anybody have a pointer to the TOPS-20 mailing list archives?

----Forwarded message----

        From: rh120@sawasdee.columbia.edu (Ronda Hauben)
        Subject: From NCP to UNIX Based TCP/IP (ARPANET to Internet)
        Date: 20 Apr 1998 17:38:55 GMT
        Organization: Columbia University


        I am working on a paper for a survey of technology engineering
        class about the role that Usenet newsgroups and ARPANET mailing list 
        played in the period of transition from the IMP based NCP ARPANET 
        to the tcp/ip UNIX based ARPANET II (the virtual network) which 
        became the Internet. I am trying to study the role that the 
        communication played and how it was helpful in this transition. 
         
             Describing this transition, Vint Cerf wrote:
         
             "People participating in this transition of the ARPANET into 
             the internet environment are participating in an event as 
             exciting as the construction of the ARPANET and I am very 
             proud to be a part of it." 
         
         
             I am interested in the transition from NCP to tcp/ip which was
        distributed with the BSD UNIX distribution. 
         
             It would be helpful to have sources about the work done at 
        the University of California Berkeley on the improvement of UNIX 
        and the extensions to UNIX V7 to support networking and the 
        discussions and work around the transition to UNIX based tcp/ip for 
        the ARPANET nodes.
 
             Also I wondered if anyone has copies of the tcp/ip digest 
        mailing list after the January 18, 1982 issue and can make them 
        available. Earlier issues were both posted on Usenet and distributed
        as an ARPANET mailing list. I am also interested in the development
        of tcp/ip for other operating systems as part of this transition
        from the ARPANET to the Internet.
             
             I welcome suggestions of sources, papers etc. that may be 
        helpful in researching this period, and particularly on the role 
        that Net communication played in this transition. Also I would 
        be interested in email contact with Network pioneers who were 
        involved in this transition, accounts of the transition, etc..
         
             Thanks for any help with this.
         
        Ronda
        ronda@panix.com
         
         
             Other draft papers about the development of the Net and of 
         UNIX are online at 

               http://www.umcc.umich.edu/~ronda

                   Netizens: On the History and Impact
                        of Usenet and the Internet
                 http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook/
                and in print edition ISBN # 0-8186-7706-6

24-Apr-1998 09:25:07 -0700,2485;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flipper.cisco.com (flipper.cisco.com [171.69.63.10]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:23:26 PDT
Received: (billw@localhost) by flipper.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) id XAA06358; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 98 23:16:42 PDT
From: William "Chops" Westfield <billw@cisco.com>
To: Clive Dawson <clive.dawson@amd.com>
Cc: tops-20@panda.com
Subject: Re: Internet History
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 22 Apr 98 11:24:58 CDT
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.893398602.billw@flipper.cisco.com>

    I recall some great war stories which appeared on this list back when
    we were all struggling to bring up Kevin Paetzold's new code with
    assorted patches and help from Bill Westfield and so many others who's
    names continue to slowly fade...

Well, thank you.  However, my contributions to tops20 internals came along
well after the "tcp/ip transition" (1/1/83) (or, looking at it another way,
the transition lasted a very long time.)

Looking back, it's amazing how early that transition was compared to other
networking "milestones."  Few places had real ethernets (and certainly not
on 20s.)  Cutting edge sites might have had some 3mb ethernet.  SRI had
"SRIIMPs" - little LSI-11s that pretended to be IMPS running NCP, while
actually communicating via (Xerox) PUP over 3Mb ethernet.  Stanford had a
lot of PUP, but I'm not sure how their 20's participated in those days.

At the time of the transition, most 20s (that spoke tcp) were running the
BBN TCP.  There were additional mini-transitions when the DEC SW and
interface (NI) came out, when DNS went in, and/or if you got a
Stanford/cisco MEIS.  My own tcp contributions happened when we noticed that
file transfers didn't go any faster of the MEIS than over the IMP, and that
trying to switch the Stanford terminal servers to tcp (for ~100 sessions per
20) didn't work very well.  These "improvements" continued pretty much up to
the time that most of the stanford 20 crew (that remained) went full-time to
cisco in 1987 or so (with occasional patches thereafter, since cisco used a
dec-20 for some time.)

BillW


17-May-1998 11:48:28 -0700,1539;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Sun, 17 May 1998 11:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Sun, 17 May 1998 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@Panda.COM>
Subject: 15 years ago today
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <MailManager.895424216.4492.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Although not as important as December 7, 1941; May 17, 1983 is nonetheless a
day which shall live in infamy in the annals of computing.  At 2PM on that
day, Ken Olsen and Bill Johnson canceled project Jupiter.  The true infamy of
that decision was not the loss of Jupiter, but rather the other decision which
went with it, which was to forgo building any other new PDP-10 CPUs and to
"integrate" the PDP-10 community into VMS.

At least that last never happened.  VMS was never a significant player on the
Internet, and has faded into well-deserved obscurity.  DEC, by "getting rid of
all the garbage" (meaning the funky 12-bit, 18-bit, and 36-bit architectures)
also got rid of its loyal customers; and is about to suffer the indignity of
being bought by a PC clone manufacturer.

However, I still get more than a modest twinge of annoyance when I see in some
book that Internet was developed on and for UNIX...


18-May-1998 21:45:12 -0700,1730;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Mon, 18 May 1998 21:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Mon, 18 May 1998 00:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nw.com (nw.com [192.92.112.34]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Mon, 18 May 1998 00:51:12 PDT
Received: (from mkl@localhost)
	by nw.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA16240
	for TOPS-20@Panda.COM; Mon, 18 May 1998 00:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 May 98 0:50:40 PDT
From: Mark Lottor <mkl@nw.com>
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Subject: end of nic
Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.895477840.mkl@nw.com>


I guess I should report the loss of another DEC-20.  The NIC 2065 was
at SRI International from approximately 1982 through 1998.  This
system was used to run the DDN Network Information Center, before SRI
lost the contract to Network Solutions.  It was known as NIC, SRI-NIC,
SRI-NIC.ARPA, NIC.DDN,MIL, and lastly as BOOTSTRAP.ORG.  It ran the
WHOIS server, generated HOST tables, handled all domain registrations,
housed the RFC library, and was a root domain server.  At one point
it had two IMP/1822 connections (to ARPANET and MILNET) and an ethernet
connection (via SRI to BARRNET).  It was the only system besides
the "mailbridges" to be dual homed between ARPANET and MILNET.

When SRI lost the NIC contract, Doug Englebart was looking for a
system to run his old Augment software and other stuff on.  Around
1992 the system was moved from SRI's E building to the P building, and
Doug used it until sometime early this year.  It finally disappeared
in the last few months, I don't know where to...

-Mark

19-May-1998 08:39:14 -0700,1666;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 19 May 1998 01:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihnp4.cirr.com (ihnp4.cirr.com [192.67.63.8]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Tue, 19 May 1998 01:12:39 PDT
Received: from sdf.UUCP (Usdf@localhost) by ihnp4.cirr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/$Revision: 1.2 $)
	 with UUCP id DAA14549 for panda.com!tops-20; Tue, 19 May 1998 03:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: med sdf.lonestar.org via sendmail vid stdio
Message-Id: <m0ybgdw-0003ADC@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: smj@sdf.lonestar.org (Stephen Jones)
Subject: end of nic 
To: tops-20@panda.com
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 02:17:00 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Content-Type: text

> It finally disappeared in the last few months, I don't know
> where to...

Mark,

I talked to Doug on the phone in the early Spring of 1994 about
NIC, the 2065.  He said that he was working with KLH to move
over to an Alpha... he also said he had been talking with XKL
to try out one of their TD-1's .. 

I'll tell you where NIC ended up .. in two words .. BRUCE KENNARD.
If you are really interested in DEC parts, he can help .. but
becareful .. these days he might try to sell you an Sun clone
made by Hyundai .. but if you are into that .. go for it.

Does anyone have pictures?

Speaking of 2065's .. Texas Women's University (about 10 miles up
the road from me) has one in an abandoned clean room .. they don't
know what to do with it. 

Stephen 

19-May-1998 22:23:57 -0700,1288;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 19 May 1998 22:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 19 May 1998 22:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deccxx (deccxx.zko.dec.com [16.31.32.97])
	by mail13.digital.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/WV1.0e) with SMTP id BAA20467
	for <TOPS-20@panda.com>; Wed, 20 May 1998 01:15:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 01:16:48 -0400
Message-Id: <98052001164809@deccxx.zko.dec.com>
From: amartin@deccxx.zko.dec.com (Alan H. Martin)
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Subject: FWD: anybody want some history?
X-VMS-To: TOPS-20

From:	US9RMC::"phil@ultimate.com" "Phil Budne" 20-MAY-1998 00:00:38.85
To:	decc::amartin
Subj:	anybody want some history?

From its-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu Tue May 19 23:46:15 1998
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 23:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: sgw@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (stephen g. wadlow)
To: its-lovers@mc.lcs.mit.edu, info-pdp11@transarc.com
reply-to: sgw@mit.edu
Subject: anybody want some history?

I know of a DecSystem 2065 in the Cambridge, MA. area that's looking
for a sympathetic home in the very near future, lest it meet an 
unhappy fate.  Any takers?

				steve

20-May-1998 14:21:21 -0700,1160;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Wed, 20 May 1998 14:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Wed, 20 May 1998 07:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dbit.dbit.com (wilson@dbit.dbit.com [199.181.141.53]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Wed, 20 May 1998 07:09:28 PDT
Received: (from wilson@localhost) by dbit.dbit.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) id KAA26645; Wed, 20 May 1998 10:17:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 10:17:52 -0400
From: John Wilson <wilson@dbit.dbit.com>
Message-Id: <199805201417.KAA26645@dbit.dbit.com>
To: its-lovers@mc.lcs.mit.edu, tops-20@panda.com
Subject: Re: 2065

>From: Doug Humphrey <doug@good.joss.com>

>Strange as it sounds, I would be interested ;-)
>
>Now that I have a warehouse, I have a place to PUT something like
>this....

If you or anyone else wants a second 2065 as a spare, plus the CPU board set
from yet another one, I'm ready to admit that I'll never get a chance to set
mine up.  It's in Troy, NY, near where I-90 and I-87 cross.

John Wilson
D Bit

05-Jun-1998 17:27:54 -0700,1798;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM>
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Subject: Sayonara, DEC
Message-ID: <Pine.NXT.4.00.9806051657190.10179-100000@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Organization: Pandamonium Reigns
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset = US-ASCII

On Thursday, June 11, 1998, Digital Equipment Corporation will cease to
exist; 15 years, 3 weeks, and 4 days after it slit its own throat by
cancelling 36 bits.

It's been a long time in coming, but it was inevitable.  DEC's survival
was based upon a fanatic corps of users who would literally buy anything
as long as it came from DEC.  How else could you explain the PDP-8/s?  
The GIGI?  The Rainbow?

The making of funky computers was a small niche, but it was a unique one,
and nobody did it better than DEC.

When MBAs replaced hackers as the decision-makers, DEC abandoned its funky
computers to go for the much larger soulless IBM-style byte oriented
market.  Deep down inside, a PDP-11 really wished that it was made by IBM
in spite of its funky DEC clothing.  The VAX, on the other hand, proudly
stood out in its three-piece suit and cried to the world "I Am Mundane!"

Problem was, in that market, DEC was just an also-ran.  In that market,
the customers wouldn't tolerate high prices, poor performance, or
corporate arrogance.

*Sigh*

In spite of everything, I'm sad to see it happen.

Nobody did it better.



07-Jun-1998 21:25:23 -0700,2210;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kermit.futura.net (kermit.futura.net [209.12.246.9]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Sun, 07 Jun 1998 21:19:29 PDT
Received: from pt18.Chef.futura.net (pt18.Chef.futura.net [209.12.247.82]) by kermit.futura.net (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id da266165 for <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 22:49:33 +0100
Message-ID: <357B600D.F4A1EFE3@futura.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 22:52:46 -0500
From: George Markham <gmarkham@futura.net>
Reply-To: gmarkham@futura.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Crispin <mrc@panda.com>
CC: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@panda.com>
Subject: Re: Sayonara, DEC
References: <Pine.NXT.4.00.9806051657190.10179-100000@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Info: Mail gateway to the Futura



Mark Crispin wrote:

> On Thursday, June 11, 1998, Digital Equipment Corporation will cease to
> exist; 15 years, 3 weeks, and 4 days after it slit its own throat by
> cancelling 36 bits.

When we rolled out our ki10 many years ago in favor of the vax, I turned aside
and never looked at anything else they did for a long, long time. Alphas are
ok, but if I want a pc on steroids, I'll grab a Sun or something of like ilk,
as the icki licensing and such is just hassle I dont need to deal with.

> The making of funky computers was a small niche, but it was a unique one,
> and nobody did it better than DEC.
>

Sure enough. All those cool engineer types in sandals were nice too

>   The VAX, on the other hand, proudly
> stood out in its three-piece suit and cried to the world "I Am Mundane!"
>

Truer words hath never been uttered.

>
>
> *Sigh*
>

Yes, sure is nice to have that xkl toad thing to type at.....

> In spite of everything, I'm sad to see it happen.
>

It really was a terrible move for them in my book too.



14-Jul-1998 16:44:08 -0700,1337;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-request@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 16:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Errors-To: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-request@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost2.transarc.com (mailhost2.transarc.com [158.98.14.14]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:20:04 PDT
Received: from smithfield.transarc.com (smithfield.transarc.com [158.98.16.10]) by mailhost2.transarc.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id NAA10530 for <tops-20@panda.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pat Barron <pat@transarc.com>
To: tops-20@panda.com
Subject: Looking for TOPS-20 distribution
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980714131148.24118E-100000@smithfield.transarc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I'm trying to find a TOPS-20 distribution; a V4 vintage would be best, but
will take anything I can get.  I can read 9-track tapes, though I don't
necessarily need a physical tape (tape images that I could FTP from
somewhere would be fine - in fact, they'd be ideal).

Yes, I am licensed for this software, I just have no media.

If you can help, please drop me a note.  Thanks!

--Pat.



09-Dec-1998 18:05:01 -0800,2404;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 18:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 10:11:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from flume.zk3.dec.com (flume.zk3.dec.com [16.140.112.3])
	by mail11.digital.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/WV2.0c) with SMTP id NAA01133
	for <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:09:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from doctor.zk3.dec.com by flume.zk3.dec.com (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/16Jan95-0946AM)
	id AA10145; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:09:44 -0500
Received: from localhost by doctor.zk3.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/11Aug98-0806AM)
	id AA02273; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:09:44 -0500
Message-Id: <9812091809.AA02273@doctor.zk3.dec.com>
To: TOPS-20@Panda.COM
Subject: A very happy DEC-10 day to all of you out there..
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 98 13:09:44 -0500
From: "Dr. Tom Blinn, 603-884-0646" <tpb@doctor.zk3.dec.com>
X-Mts: smtp

A recent message from someone in Norway who happens to share the same first
name asking about our "name day" (he sent it to everyone at Compaq Computer
Corporation with the given name "Thomas") reminded me of the tradition of
honoring the former Digital Equipment Corporation's 36-bit systems on both
DEC 10 and DEC 20 days..

And since it's already DEC-10 day in some parts of the world, I thought I'd
send out my wishes to all of you fellow die-hards on this list.

Tom
 
 Dr. Thomas P. Blinn + UNIX Software Group + Compaq Computer Corporation
  110 Spit Brook Road, MS ZKO3-2/U20   Nashua, New Hampshire 03062-2698
   Technology Partnership Engineering           Phone:  (603) 884-0646
    Internet: tpb@zk3.dec.com           Digital's Easynet: alpha::tpb
     ACM Member: tpblinn@acm.org         PC@Home: tom@felines.mv.net

  Worry kills more people than work because more people worry than work.

      Keep your stick on the ice.        -- Steve Smith ("Red Green")

     My favorite palindrome is: Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
                                         -- Phil Agre, pagre@ucsd.edu

     Yesterday it worked / Today it is not working / UNIX is like that 
			-- apologies to Margaret Segall 

  Opinions expressed herein are my own, and do not necessarily represent
  those of my employer or anyone else, living or dead, real or imagined.
 

12-Dec-1998 17:30:03 -0800,3054;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 17:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nix.swip.net (nix.swip.net [192.71.220.2]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:02:31 PST
Received: from localhost (bygg@localhost) 
          by nix.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP 
          id XAA23186 for <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>; 
          Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:55:48 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:55:48 +0100 (MET)
From: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@swip.net>
Reply-To: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@swip.net>
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Subject: Re: A very happy DEC-10 day to all of you out there..
In-Reply-To: <9812091809.AA02273@doctor.zk3.dec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981210234203.21621A-100000@nix>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Dr. Tom Blinn, 603-884-0646 wrote:

> A recent message from someone in Norway who happens to share the same first
> name asking about our "name day" (he sent it to everyone at Compaq Computer
> Corporation with the given name "Thomas") reminded me of the tradition of
> honoring the former Digital Equipment Corporation's 36-bit systems on both
> DEC 10 and DEC 20 days..
> 
> And since it's already DEC-10 day in some parts of the world, I thought I'd
> send out my wishes to all of you fellow die-hards on this list.

Since I am a die-hard, I took the liberty of spinning up some disks and
giving some commands, taking her out for a ride:

Nadja 7.04 20:35:46 TTY20 system 4280
Connected to Node 59.1 Line # 0
Please LOGIN

.sys us
 1    [OPR]	OPERATOR    	CTY	NETWOR	14+18
 2     2,5	            	20	SYSTAT	21+SPY

.KJOB
.log 10,335
JOB 2 Nadja 7.04 TTY20
Password: 
Thursday 98-12-10  20:36       Last login 98-12-10  20:28

.term defer

.run arplst

ARP count: 15
IP addr= 130.237.235.94, HW addr= 00:80:ad:c6:57:00, TTL= 280
IP addr= 130.237.234.76, HW addr= 00:aa:00:48:54:7a, TTL= 276
IP addr= 130.237.234.54, HW addr= 08:00:20:1a:5a:a5, TTL= 274
IP addr= 130.237.234.73, HW addr= 08:00:20:18:94:5b, TTL= 297
IP addr= 130.237.234.48, HW addr= 08:00:20:1a:77:ac, TTL= 220
IP addr= 130.237.234.19, HW addr= aa:00:04:00:01:ec, TTL= 220
IP addr= 130.237.234.46, HW addr= 08:00:20:19:4a:37, TTL= 279
IP addr= 130.237.234.58, HW addr= 08:00:20:1a:73:e4, TTL= 203
IP addr= 130.237.234.50, HW addr= 08:00:20:1a:44:6a, TTL= 200
IP addr= 130.237.234.41, HW addr= 08:00:20:10:aa:c5, TTL= 164
IP addr= 130.237.234.55, HW addr= 08:00:20:1a:6d:9e, TTL= 277
IP addr= 130.237.234.224, HW addr= 00:80:24:01:5a:6b, TTL= 297
IP addr= 130.237.235.93, HW addr= 00:a0:24:82:e7:cc, TTL= 275
IP addr= 130.237.234.1, HW addr= 00:00:0c:01:c4:ec, TTL= 176
IP addr= 130.237.234.17, HW addr= 08:00:20:19:9b:90, TTL= 31

.kjob

To paraphrase Monty Python: Not dead, just resting.

> Tom

--Johnny


15-Dec-1998 16:02:27 -0800,1338;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 16:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 16:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 16:00:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM>
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Subject: bugfix for FLKTIM bugchks after system up for 198.3 days
Message-ID: <Pine.NXT.4.10.9812151551190.5149-100000@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Organization: Pandamonium Reigns
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Thanks to Ralph Gorin of XKL for reporting the problem.

Problem:
	FLKTIM bugchks start happening after the system is up for 198.3
	days.

Diagnosis:
	TODCLK exceeds what fork timeouts think is a "very large number".

Binary patch:
	FUNLK+5/ MOVSI T1,20000  HRLOI T1,377777

Source change: In FORK.MAC in FUNLK, change:
	MOVX T1,1B1		;GET VERY LARGE NUMBER
to be
	MOVX T1,.INFIN		;GET VERY LARGE NUMBER

-- Mark --

* RCW 19.149 notice: This email address is located in Washington State.	*
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message.		*
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.


16-Dec-1998 16:52:12 -0800,1149;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:52:12 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 07:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opost.com (dlm@opost.com [207.22.41.2]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 07:26:28 PST
Received: (from dlm@localhost)
	by opost.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA19578
	for TOPS-20@Panda.COM; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:26:22 -0500
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:26:22 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dlm@opost.com>
Message-Id: <199812161526.KAA19578@opost.com>
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Subject: Re: bugfix for FLKTIM bugchks after system up for 198.3 days


    Cool!  I wonder if there are any Y2K bugs lurking about...
    
    
    dlm
    
==============

    Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM> writes:

> Thanks to Ralph Gorin of XKL for reporting the problem.

> Problem:
> 	FLKTIM bugchks start happening after the system is up for 198.3
> 	days.

> Diagnosis:
> 	TODCLK exceeds what fork timeouts think is a "very large number".

16-Dec-1998 16:52:22 -0800,1696;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@Panda.COM>
Subject: a sad today
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <MailManager.913853685.649.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Today, I began transferring the contents of my primary RM05 (via KERMIT at
9600 baud) on my 2020 to a SCSI drive on a UNIX system.  The 2020 had been
sitting idle for over a year, and now that I had some disk space on the UNIX
machine I decided to make good use of it.  I got Tenex monitor sources, Tenex
EXEC sources, and most of 4.1 monitor sources, but in TIMER.MAC the RM05
crapped out.

I can't tell if it's a head crash or if it got too hot or what.  It's typical
head crash behavior; random (and escalating) disk errors.  I spun the RM05
down, now it won't spin up again.

A brief moment of silence, please....


Fortunately, I have another RM05 drive and TOPS-20 system pack that is more or
less complete and up to date.  I also have backup tapes, so I should be able
to recover most of what was last.  I also have two working RM03s.

It's clear, though, that this antique hardware isn't going to last much
longer.  As expected, the disks are what's going first.  It's too bad that
nobody ever succeeded in working out an interface between MASSBUS and modern
disks.


17-Dec-1998 11:47:17 -0800,2140;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 02:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Zeke.Update.UU.SE (2026@Zeke.Update.UU.SE [130.238.11.14]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 02:23:53 PST
Received: from localhost (bqt@localhost)
	by Zeke.Update.UU.SE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA21829;
	Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:23:40 +0100
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:23:37 +0100 (MET)
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
To: Mark Crispin <MRC@panda.com>
cc: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@panda.com>
Subject: Re: a sad today
In-Reply-To: <MailManager.913853685.649.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.VUL.3.93.981217111912.21631A-100000@Zeke.Update.UU.SE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Mark Crispin wrote:

Hi, Mark.

Sad to hear the RM05 give up.

> It's clear, though, that this antique hardware isn't going to last much
> longer.  As expected, the disks are what's going first.  It's too bad that
> nobody ever succeeded in working out an interface between MASSBUS and modern
> disks.

Hmmm, I seem to remember a MASSBUS <-> SCSI interface being sold a few
years ago, along with a SCSI-disk, and the whole thing called an RM06.

Good luck on getting such hardware donated though. I doubt that very many
were sold.

Problem with MASSBUS is that systems are expected to know so much of the
disk that it's hard to get sensible replacements. They'll have to emulate
something existing, or no OS will touch it. And RP07 is as large as they
get, and that's only 1/2 gig approx. :-/

Oh well. Hope your -2020 will live on. Did DEC ever support MSCP on it?

	Johnny

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol


28-Dec-1998 20:38:12 -0800,1262;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 20:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:49:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM>
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Subject: R.I.P. PANDA:
Message-ID: <Pine.NXT.4.10.9812281243230.6913-100000@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
Organization: Pandamonium Reigns
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Well, I took a closer look at my primary RM05 pack with a flashlight.  As
feared, one of the surfaces has the unmistakable scoring of a head crash.
So, the pack is toast and the drive is probably toast as well (I doubt it
is possible to repair an RM05 any more, and certainly not affordably).

I'm going to take a look at how current the filesystem is on my backup
RM05 PS.  I think that it's more or less up to date.  The other RM05
drive is believed to work, but hasn't ever been exercised much.  I have a
full DUMPER backup on 9track tape; I better plan on getting that onto more
reliable media ASAP.



29-Dec-1998 01:18:53 -0800,4646;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 01:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by tymix.Tymnet.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA07405; Tue, 29 Dec 98 00:49:34 PST
Received: from tardis
	by Tymnet.COM (in.smtpd); 29 Dec 98 0:49:34 PST
Received: from doctor.Tymnet.COM by tardis.Tymnet.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id AAA06604; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:49:32 -0800
Received: from doctor by doctor.Tymnet.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id AAA22201; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:49:31 -0800
Message-Id: <199812290849.AAA22201@doctor.Tymnet.COM>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:49:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Baltrunas <carl@tardis.Tymnet.COM>
Reply-To: Carl Baltrunas <carl@tardis.Tymnet.COM>
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA:
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Cc: carl@reststop.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Md5: 19zTPZypR7bjfLjAuQqpfA==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4m sparc 


> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:49:33 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM>
> To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
> Subject: R.I.P. PANDA:
> 
> Well, I took a closer look at my primary RM05 pack with a flashlight.  As
> feared, one of the surfaces has the unmistakable scoring of a head crash.
> So, the pack is toast and the drive is probably toast as well (I doubt it
> is possible to repair an RM05 any more, and certainly not affordably).
> 
> I'm going to take a look at how current the filesystem is on my backup
> RM05 PS.  I think that it's more or less up to date.  The other RM05
> drive is believed to work, but hasn't ever been exercised much.  I have a
> full DUMPER backup on 9track tape; I better plan on getting that onto more
> reliable media ASAP.

Sorry to hear about your RM03.  Good thing you have backups.
> 

I will need my address on this list changed, as it appears that after 18
years and many company name changes, the layoff package they are offering
here is too attractive to pass over.  I MAY still stay if they put it in
writing that I can still get the same layoff package for up to the next 24
months, but I am not betting on it and am expecting that they will simply
let me take the layoff... 3 weeks of pay per year of service, plus full
continued medical coverage for the severance period.
(We'll know in a day or so, since my last scheduled day is Dec 31st.)


My new address is 'carl@reststop.com' which is my home domain.


It is likely that I may have another address soon, on my very own XKL Toad-1
server running in my garage, but that is not expected for a couple of weeks
when we shut it down and haul it out of the data center.  My co-hort in arms,
Joe Smith, is expecting to obtain the other XKL and we hope to have them
both up on the net shortly thereafter.  (like within a day of getting it home).

Of course, it is running TOPS-20 Monitor 7(102400)-1, so it's a N-I-C-E
machine.  We will be entertaining useful purposes for the machines, so if
you have any good ideas, feel free to email me, or Joe at my new addess,
or either/both of our old addresses: carl@tymnet.com or jms@tymnet.com.

Guest accounts may be available at some time in the future, but in my
case it'll be connected to the net via a dedicated dialup-ppp link, it
won't have fast net access.  Joe should be connected via a cable modem
so his will have plenty of bandwidth in at least one direction if @home
gets their act together.

Cheers!

-Carl

Carl A Baltrunas, Catalyst Industries, Milpitas CA, carl@reststop.com

soon to be formerly of... (this was all one company, bought and sold)

MCI Worldcom Network Management, San Jose, CA  95131
formerly MCI Telecommunications Corp.,
formerly BTNA, Inc.,
formerly BT North America,
formerly BT Tymnet,
formerly McDonnell Douglas Network Systems Company,
formerly McDonnell Douglas Field Service Company,
formerly McDonnell Douglas Integrated Systems Group,
formerly McDonnell Douglas Tymshare,
formerly Tymshare, Inc.
Phone: (408) 922-6206, Fax: (408) 922-6702, email: carl.baltrunas@mci.com

"DOS Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy, and
millions of others are by far the most popular, with about 70 million machines
in use worldwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches
are far more numerous than humans, and that numbers alone do not denote a
higher life form."
       -New York Times, November 26, 1991


29-Dec-1998 10:23:01 -0800,3296;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 10:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 05:09:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from quarry.zk3.dec.com (rock.zk3.dec.com [16.141.0.34])
	by mail13.digital.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/WV2.0c) with SMTP id IAA24698;
	Tue, 29 Dec 1998 08:08:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from doctor.zk3.dec.com by quarry.zk3.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/16Jan95-0946AM)
	id AA14930; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 08:08:02 -0500
Received: from localhost by doctor.zk3.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/11Aug98-0806AM)
	id AA24128; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 08:08:02 -0500
Message-Id: <9812291308.AA24128@doctor.zk3.dec.com>
To: Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM>
Cc: TOPS-20@Panda.COM
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA: 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Dec 98 12:49:33 PST."
             <Pine.NXT.4.10.9812281243230.6913-100000@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> 
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 98 08:08:02 -0500
From: "Dr. Tom Blinn, 603-884-0646" <tpb@doctor.zk3.dec.com>
X-Mts: smtp


> Well, I took a closer look at my primary RM05 pack with a flashlight.  As
> feared, one of the surfaces has the unmistakable scoring of a head crash.
> So, the pack is toast and the drive is probably toast as well (I doubt it
> is possible to repair an RM05 any more, and certainly not affordably).
> 
> I'm going to take a look at how current the filesystem is on my backup
> RM05 PS.  I think that it's more or less up to date.  The other RM05
> drive is believed to work, but hasn't ever been exercised much.  I have a
> full DUMPER backup on 9track tape; I better plan on getting that onto more
> reliable media ASAP.

The joys of old, outmoded hardware.  Indeed, it's unfortunate that there has
been no real market for things like a MASSBUS to SCSI adapter, or better yet
native SCSI.  On the 2020, at least it might have been possible to build a
Unibus SCSI interface, if there were only a market..

Sort of like what's happened to i286 PCs and ISA-only systems -- fallen by the
wayside.

At least 9 track tape hasn't completely gone away, but finding a system that
can actually interpret a DUMPER tape (or any other archaic software format) is
increasingly difficult.  And the DUMPER format is pretty trivial.

Tom
 
 Dr. Thomas P. Blinn + UNIX Software Group + Compaq Computer Corporation
  110 Spit Brook Road, MS ZKO3-2/U20   Nashua, New Hampshire 03062-2698
   Technology Partnership Engineering           Phone:  (603) 884-0646
    Internet: tpb@zk3.dec.com           Digital's Easynet: alpha::tpb
     ACM Member: tpblinn@acm.org         PC@Home: tom@felines.mv.net

  Worry kills more people than work because more people worry than work.

      Keep your stick on the ice.        -- Steve Smith ("Red Green")

     My favorite palindrome is: Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
                                         -- Phil Agre, pagre@ucsd.edu

     Yesterday it worked / Today it is not working / UNIX is like that 
			-- apologies to Margaret Segall 

  Opinions expressed herein are my own, and do not necessarily represent
  those of my employer or anyone else, living or dead, real or imagined.
 

29-Dec-1998 11:22:13 -0800,1543;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 10:58:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rumor.research.att.com (rumor.research.att.com [192.20.225.9]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 10:57:31 PST
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Tue Dec 29 13:48:54 EST 1998
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research; Tue Dec 29 13:54:37 EST 1998
Received: from arran.research.att.com (arran.research.att.com [135.207.24.12])
	by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25143;
	Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:54:39 -0500 (EST)
From: John Ioannidis <ji@research.att.com>
Received: (from ji@localhost) by arran.research.att.com (8.7.5/8.7) id NAA02714; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:54:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:54:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199812291854.NAA02714@arran.research.att.com>
To: mrc@panda.com, tpb@doctor.zk3.dec.com
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA:
Cc: TOPS-20@panda.com

> can actually interpret a DUMPER tape (or any other archaic software format) is
> increasingly difficult.  And the DUMPER format is pretty trivial.

The people at the computer center at Columbia University had written such a 
tool (any of you guys on this list?). If there is interest, I will try 
contacting them about releasing the source.

/ji

29-Dec-1998 13:15:30 -0800,1753;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ultimate.com (philbudne.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.200.151]) by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:01:51 PST
Received: (from phil@localhost)
	by ultimate.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA13467;
	Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:00:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:00:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Phil Budne <phil@ultimate.com>
Message-Id: <199812292100.QAA13467@ultimate.com>
To: ji@research.att.com, mrc@panda.com, tpb@doctor.zk3.dec.com
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA:
Cc: TOPS-20@panda.com

	From: John Ioannidis <ji@research.att.com>
	Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:54:36 -0500 (EST)

	> can actually interpret a DUMPER tape (or any other archaic
	> software format) is increasingly difficult.  And the DUMPER
	> format is pretty trivial.

	The people at the computer center at Columbia University had
	written such a tool (any of you guys on this list?). If there
	is interest, I will try contacting them about releasing the
	source.

read20 is widely available (in various versions) and works well.
It was written by Jim Guyton at the Rand Corporation, and has been
modified by Jay Lepreau, Univ of Utah and Stu Grossman (Stanford).

	ftp://ftp.dbit.com/pub/pdp10/tops20/read20/
	ftp://ftp-ns.rutgers.edu/pub/read20/

I also have a program "backup10" by Johnny Eriksson <bygg@sunet.se>
that I've modified to generate tape listings that look like BACKUP's
own, and restore the correct file date/times, and other stuff.

-phil

29-Dec-1998 14:38:10 -0800,2036;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [158.152.22.219] (helo=badlands.demon.co.uk)
	by post.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2)
	id 0zv5bb-0002mW-00
	for TOPS-20@Panda.COM; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 20:19:11 +0000
Comments: Authenticated sender is <badlands@sdps.demon.co.uk>
From: "Neil Pellinacci" <neil@badlands.demon.co.uk>
To: TOPS-20@panda.com
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 20:22:26 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA:
Reply-to: neil@badlands.demon.co.uk
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <199812291854.NAA02714@arran.research.att.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54)
Message-Id: <E0zv5bb-0002mW-00@post.mail.demon.net>

John Ioannidis <ji@research.att.com> wrote in response to Tom Blinn 
<tpb@doctor.zk3.dec.com>:

> > can actually interpret a DUMPER tape (or any other archaic software format) is
> > increasingly difficult.  And the DUMPER format is pretty trivial.

Unlike nearly everything nowadays :-)

> The people at the computer center at Columbia University had
> written such a tool (any of you guys on this list?). If there is
> interest, I will try contacting them about releasing the source. 

I remember talk of dumper32 on VAX/VMS, but I've never actually seen 
it.

If such a thing exists and someone in the UK can pull stuff off a
tape, I'd be interested as we should have a couple hiding
somewhere...

Cheers,

Neil.

Neil Pellinacci, neil@badlands.demon.co.uk, morgan@serf.org

i know what's good for you      |  why let your heart bleed
i have my reasons               |  why suffer soul strain
i draw these plans for you      |  why lose your sleep
pick them up you'll need them   |  over things such as these?

29-Dec-1998 14:59:12 -0800,2060;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) (invoked by user mrc) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:58:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:39:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@Panda.COM>
Subject: latest update
To: TOPS-20 Hackers and Yackers <TOPS-20@Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <MailManager.914971181.17219.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Well, the situation is not as bad as it could have been.  But it could be
better.

It appears that my backup RM05 pack has an image of PANDA: from August 1992.
That means that I have definitely lost some 5.5 and 7.1 monitor edits that I
made, but hopefully not too many.

My 2020 has been busy since yesterday afternoon running two simultaneous
KERMIT streams loading the text contents of that filesystem to a SCSI drive on
UNIX that I have dedicated for this purpose.  So far, about 60MB has been
transferred onto safe media, including the 4.1 monitor source transfer which
got aborted by the head crash.

I could kick myself for not transferring 5.5 monitor sources first, since the
head crash happened while TIMER.MAC was being transferred.  Well, live and
learn.

I'm going to try to read my backup tapes later this week; hopefully I'll be
able to recover what I lost.  I'll also see if the backup (now primary) RM05
can be updated to the state that PANDA: was before the crash, but since I
don't seem to have a working tape drive any more, that'll probably be more
KERMIT work.

A 2020 running two KERMITs at 9600 baud is very slow!  ;-)

My main goal at this point is to conserve what's still working on this system.
The loss of both the primary RM05 and TU45 is a severe blow but fortunately
not devastating.  The next loss will be devastating.  I still plan to have
these machines running at midnight, January 1, 2000.


29-Dec-1998 21:04:09 -0800,1692;000000000000
Return-Path: <tops-20-errors@Panda.COM>
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for t20arc; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Errors-To: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Sender: tops-20-errors@Panda.COM
Precedence: bulk
Received: via tmail-4.1(8) for tops-20; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 19:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MA.UltraNet.Com (d124.dial-1.cmb.ma.ultra.net [209.6.64.124]) by antiochus-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult.n20340) with ESMTP id WAA19488; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 22:03:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <368990AA.9E08C38B@MA.UltraNet.Com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:32:10 -0500
From: "Alan H. Martin" <AMartin@MA.UltraNet.Com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,en-US,en-GB,es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: TOPS-20@Panda.COM
CC: neil@badlands.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: R.I.P. PANDA:
References: <E0zv5bb-0002mW-00@post.mail.demon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Neil Pellinacci wrote:

> I remember talk of dumper32 on VAX/VMS, but I've never actually seen
> it.
> 
> If such a thing exists and someone in the UK can pull stuff off a
> tape, I'd be interested as we should have a couple hiding
> somewhere...

I don't have access to a VMS system, but there are sources for
SI_DUMPER/DUMPER-32 at:

http://www.decus.org/libcatalog/document_html/vs0097_3.html

I have some additional bug fixes:

1.  Filespecs containing ^V.
2.  Files with generation numbers >=32K.
3.  Filenames that start with ``-''.
4.  Files named foo.DIR.

None of the edits are production quality, but they beat hell out of DUMPER-32
aborting in the middle of a restore.
				/AHM
-- 
Alan Howard Martin				AMartin@MA.UltraNet.Com