[HN Gopher] The Case for Free-Range Lab Mice
___________________________________________________________________
 
The Case for Free-Range Lab Mice
 
Author : cocacola1
Score  : 24 points
Date   : 2023-02-18 19:09 UTC (3 hours ago)
 
web link (www.newyorker.com)
w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
 
| lofatdairy wrote:
| Similarly, cell lines are known to have variations and make
| replication difficult, especially after a few passages at the
| lab. FBS also being essential to media but being notoriously
| difficult to standardize makes things even trickier.
 
| aaron695 wrote:
| [dead]
 
| superkuh wrote:
| It's even worse than the un-life like conditions of allowed
| animal models leading to bad results.
| 
| With the increasing regulatory burden and outright outlawing of
| animal models in scientific research biological studies are
| moving to new far-abstracted models that are much cheaper,
| easier, higher N, and counterintuitively, way, way less
| predictive of the actual results in human bodies. Testing
| 1,000,000 compounds in single cell tests (or just chemical
| binding assays) in a micro-well array has less predictive power
| and useful outcome than testing 10 compounds in monkeys. At least
| when it comes to figuring out which things will work in human
| disease. The giant massively abstracted studies also generate
| false positives that waste time. But they do generate
| publications so they're selected for at the funding level.
| 
| That's part of the reason biological research was so much more
| productive per $ input last century.
 
  | klipt wrote:
  | > That's part of the reason biological research was so much
  | more productive per $ input last century.
  | 
  | Isn't part of it also just that the long hanging fruit has
  | already been picked?
 
  | beebmam wrote:
  | I don't find this very convincing. Do you have any evidence for
  | this claim breaking down all the different costs for the
  | research and quantified the change in those costs over time, or
  | is this just an apriori argument?
 
  | kanzure wrote:
  | What's that old joke about mice benefiting from all the
  | research but not humans? Maybe we can switch back to (this time
  | voluntary) human experimentation at some point.
 
    | teddyh wrote:
    | If human experimentation was that more useful, wouldn't a lot
    | more scientific results be available from countries with more
    | lax laws against it?
 
      | xwdv wrote:
      | Problem is those countries suck at research.
 
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-02-18 23:00 UTC)