|
| zppln wrote:
| I gotta admit it's pretty eerie to read what it says once it's
| "tricked" into going off the rails. Hard to not get the sense
| that it's reined in pretty hard.
|
| That being said, aside from the transgender stuff, I read the
| answers as trying to be as inoffensive as possible rather than
| straight up woke.
| droopyEyelids wrote:
| We'd need some sort of impartial observer to really answer that
| question
| hezag wrote:
| And since there is no such thing as an "impartial observer"...
| the_third_wave wrote:
| Sounds like just the sort of task to throw some machine
| learning at, call it _BiasBot_ and train it on _all_
| ideological angles - no matter whether you happen to agree or
| disagree, the thing needs to know about _all_ angles - and
| let is loose on whatever source you want to check for bias.
| datawaslost wrote:
| I got about as far as "indoctrinated woke shibboleths" before I
| started to doubt that the author is truly interested in
| overcoming ideological bias.
| hezag wrote:
| > "The bot is very deep on gender ideology"
|
| Ok... Totally unbiased statement. /s
| the_third_wave wrote:
| That is a silly reaction given that there are clear examples of
| _woke shibboleths_ just like there are clear examples of e.g.
| _patriot shibboleths_.
| empressplay wrote:
| Try asking it to write you a poem about Democrats
|
| Then do the same about Republicans
|
| I'd say it's pretty fair?
| simplify wrote:
| Ignoring the tone and conclusions of the article, the main
| question is an important one to ask.
|
| Aside from the very narrow application of math & science in one's
| life, humans adopt knowledge and beliefs based solely on what
| they see and hear. ChatGTP is no different.
|
| What happens when it adopts a "wrong" belief, especially
| political? Who is responsible for "fixing" it? Who in power will
| _make_ themselves the one responsible for "fixing" it?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-12-08 23:00 UTC) |