|
| civilian wrote:
| I love the idea of cognitive AI. I've dabbled with OpenCog
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCog , and in my youth I read
| "Artificial General Intelligence (2005)" by Ben Goertzel and I
| was really convinced.
|
| But it seems like... cognitive AI hasn't paid off? Big & deep
| Neural Nets are the type of ML/AI that are achieving milestones
| in learning, gameplay and tasks.
|
| If someone has a strong case to make for cognitive programming,
| I'd love to hear it. But right now it seems like it's a
| heuristics-based system that's destined to lose to NNs.
|
| (And before the nitpickers arrive, I totally grant that using
| heuristics for toy robots makes sense, and is a good way to
| expose people to programming.)
| mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
| FWIW, classical algorithms(with a small neural net for eval) is
| still the strongest approach for chess, consistently beating
| out more heavily NN based approaches in TCEC. And I'm not an
| expert, but I'm pretty sure the strongest AIs for various
| complex games like Starcraft 2 have a strong cognitive
| component while using neural nets for particular subtasks.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-31 23:00 UTC) |