[HN Gopher] Saudi Arabia sentenced a woman to 34 years in prison...
___________________________________________________________________
 
Saudi Arabia sentenced a woman to 34 years in prison for tweeting
 
Author : doener
Score  : 116 points
Date   : 2022-08-17 19:54 UTC (3 hours ago)
 
web link (www.theverge.com)
w3m dump (www.theverge.com)
 
| jiggawatts wrote:
| Any time you read a headline like this, replace the innocuous-
| sounding non-crime ("tweeting") with "upsetting people in power."
| 
| Suddenly you'll realise that the same kind of thing happens
| everywhere in the world.
| 
| E.g.: Julian Assange, who's main crime was _upsetting people in
| power_.
| 
| Unless you think it's a crime worthy of being hounded for over a
| decade by multiple nations' security agencies for trying to --
| and failing -- to reverse an NT hash.
| 
| Because that's the "crime" they're extraditing him for.
 
  | tonmoy wrote:
  | But the threshold for upsetting people in power varies. So this
  | sed doesn't give us any extra insight or predictive power. For
  | example I can say "The Jewish people upset the Nazi party in
  | Germany during WW2"
 
    | pessimizer wrote:
    | I don't understand the comparison. The Nazis weren't very
    | subtle about how upset they were with Jewish people.
 
  | siva7 wrote:
  | Not really. Tweeting your opinion is legal, leaking state
  | secrets not so.
 
    | random314 wrote:
    | Assange is Australian
 
    | colordrops wrote:
    | Are you talking about Assange? He is not being charged with
    | leaking state secrets, because it's not against the law if
    | you didn't steal them firsthand, especially for non-citizens
    | outside of the country.
 
    | nradov wrote:
    | Not really. Leaking state secrets isn't a crime under US
    | federal law for people who have no security clearance. Julian
    | Assange is charged with conspiracy to commit computer
    | intrusion.
    | 
    | https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/wikileaks-founder-
    | charg...
 
      | bena wrote:
      | Yeah, I technically can't leak state secrets because I'm
      | not privy to them. So if I have them, they're already
      | leaked. I would be post-crime.
 
    | croes wrote:
    | Strange, the US newspapers that wrote articles based on
    | WikiLeaks leaks won prices.
    | 
    | And WikiLeaks isn't the leaker but the publisher of that
    | leaks.
 
      | edm0nd wrote:
      | That's pretty arguable.
      | 
      | Assange is in chat logs with Manning who then passed
      | Assange a password hash and with Assange saying he will
      | attempt to get it cracked. The password would have given
      | Manning admin privileges on SIPRNet, allowing her to pull
      | more files to leak and better cover her tracks.
      | 
      | That's being pretty directly involved in leaks imo.
      | 
      | src: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/5816949/Julian-
      | Assang...
 
    | rndgermandude wrote:
    | So if I leaked Saudi state secrets, should I be extradited to
    | Saudi Arabia? Or is that only if I leaked the secrets of a
    | state you consider a "good guy" state?
 
  | Bolkan wrote:
  | Anyone knows what she actually tweeted?
 
    | pasttense01 wrote:
    | "Her Twitter profile showed she had 2,597 followers. Among
    | tweets about Covid burnout and pictures of her young
    | children, Shehab sometimes retweeted tweets by Saudi
    | dissidents living in exile, which called for the release of
    | political prisoners in the kingdom. She seemed to support the
    | case of Loujain al-Hathloul, a prominent Saudi feminist
    | activist who was previously imprisoned, is alleged to have
    | been tortured for supporting driving rights for women"
    | 
    | https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/16/saudi-woman-
    | gi...
    | 
    | A totally insignificant opponent of the regime; probably most
    | of us reading this thread have made comparable comments about
    | either the Democratic or Republican Presidencies.
 
    | dm319 wrote:
    | I've read it was 'finally!', in response to an official tweet
    | about a launch of some public buses. This was in 2019, and it
    | seems like she got some abuse from a guy in Saudi, who is
    | believed to have reported her using some kind of Saudi app
    | for doing this.
    | 
    | https://theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/17/saudi-arabia-
    | snitc...
 
  | KerrAvon wrote:
  | The crimes he is alleged to have committed are detailed here by
  | DOJ (during the Trump administration) and do not match your
  | assertions.
  | 
  | https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-julian-assa...
 
    | colordrops wrote:
    | I don't think you get the GP's point. The comment was meant
    | to describe motivations. Obviously no one is literally
    | charged with "upsetting people in power".
 
    | overtonwhy wrote:
    | "Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and
    | the WikiLeaks website to try to help now-U.S. President
    | Donald Trump win the 2016 election, a Republican-led Senate
    | committee said in its final review of the matter on Tuesday."
    | 
    | https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-
    | senate/s...
 
  | sva_ wrote:
  | Even here in Germany, a man was harassed and had his house
  | raided by police for tweeting a pretty insignificant insult
  | directed at a politician[0].
  | 
  | [0]
  | https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/09/pimmelgate-g...
 
    | yrgulation wrote:
    | Not surprised. In germany its common practice for the police
    | to monitor people based on ethnicity for instance,
    | indiscriminately of wether they committed crime or not. A
    | thing of the past one should think.
 
| djyaz1200 wrote:
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtcaIA9SU7o
 
| chitowneats wrote:
| What an absolute human rights disaster Saudi Arabia is.
| 
| That the U.S. government continues to engage with and support
| that regime is all the evidence you need of our hypocrisy on the
| issue.
 
  | quantified wrote:
  | If you drive a car, fly on a plane, have trucks in your supply
  | chain, use plastic anywhere in your life- you support that
  | engagement. Sucks but they're built in now.
 
    | random314 wrote:
    | We seem to be able to be hostile to Russia and China while
    | depending om them for oil and manufacturing.
    | 
    | Extending the same courtesy to Saudi Arabia should be
    | straightforward. Except, of course, Saudis align with NATO,
    | Russia and China don't.
 
    | robotnikman wrote:
    | They also contribute a lot to VC funds iirc
 
  | haliskerbas wrote:
  | Same happens in the US. We just wave it under "woke snowflake"
  | if you don't like it.
 
    | chitowneats wrote:
    | We don't throw people in prison for 3 decades over social
    | media posts.
 
      | lizardactivist wrote:
 
        | drstewart wrote:
 
      | phpisthebest wrote:
      | We do if they would contain magic words that make them run
      | afoul of the plainly unconstitutional Espionage Act
 
        | zeraynor wrote:
        | It does seem difficult balancing an open and free society
        | with mechanisms for protecting and maintaining government
        | secrets, and punishing those who betray those secrets.
        | 
        | Do you believe it is plainly unconstitutional simply
        | because it posting to twitter involves words?
 
      | fein wrote:
      | Austria nearly does. Mr. Bond. I see little difference
      | between tweets and political parody songs.
 
      | pessimizer wrote:
      | We can just refer to the social media posts as "material
      | support to a terrorist organization."
 
        | ethanbond wrote:
        | Equating the US to Saudi Arabia is beyond divorced from
        | reality. No, you can't "just" do that and get anywhere
        | close to similar outcomes as what's happened here.
        | 
        | Turn on your TV anywhere in America, walk into a coffee
        | shop, talk to a friend. Conversations freely and
        | frequently come to vigorous criticisms of those in power.
        | Now go try to do that almost anywhere in the Middle East.
        | You'll struggle to find someone willing to even remotely
        | entertain that conversation with you.
        | 
        |  _That 's_ what oppression looks like. Not hypotheticals
        | like the one you're proposing here.
 
        | Volundr wrote:
        | Any examples of this happening?
 
  | emmab wrote:
  | Which lets you know what your stance towards the United States
  | should be, or you'll be complicit too.
  | 
  | All evil regimes must fall.
  | 
  | Transitive complicity is still complicity.
 
    | mminer237 wrote:
    | Every country on earth has diplomatic relations with Saudia
    | Arabia except Belize, the Holy See, Iran, Iraq, Israel,
    | Nepal, North Korea, Papua New Guinea, Saint Vincent and the
    | Grenadines, Taiwan, Western Sahara, and a few Pacific
    | micronations. Obviously the House of Saud is evil, but it's
    | largely impossible to have a modern society without their
    | oil.
 
      | kennedywm wrote:
      | "It's largely impossible to have a modern society without
      | their oil."
      | 
      | Not true. They produce less oil than the US and Russia and
      | were only responsible for 12% of global oil production in
      | 2021.
 
  | HL33tibCe7 wrote:
  | Hypocrisy or realpolitik, depending on how nuanced your
  | worldview is.
 
    | chitowneats wrote:
    | It is realpolitik. Absolutely.
    | 
    | We ruthlessly engage in it, but whenever anyone else on Earth
    | tries it, we whip out the "freedom, democracy, human rights"
    | rhetoric.
    | 
    | We shouldn't be surprised when that rings hollow elsewhere in
    | the world.
 
  | ProAm wrote:
  | There is no hypocrisy there, like everything in life, including
  | startup life, everything comes down to money. And money is
  | power. The US created the Saudi Arabian powerhouse we see
  | today. We need them to keep our economic inertia moving forward
  | at a pace acceptable for the populace. Is it a travesty? 100%
  | But we made this bed.
 
    | chitowneats wrote:
    | Americans like to pretend that we fight for higher ideals
    | than naked self interest or national interest.
 
      | whiddershins wrote:
      | Americans fight for ideals all the time. Individual
      | Americans do, and this includes individuals in government.
      | 
      | It is true to say that much that is represented as being
      | about ideals is really something else in disguise. And
      | there is rampant corruption and so forth.
      | 
      | But it takes cynicism too far to say that ideals never
      | factor in. There are many principled people with ideals
      | having impact in the world every day, and there is nothing
      | enlightened about deriding their efforts or pretending they
      | don't exist.
 
        | random314 wrote:
        | > Americans fight for ideals all the time
        | 
        | The US government, post ww2, fights for Corporations in
        | the NATO axis that benefit from a particular regime being
        | in power in a particular country.
        | 
        | Sometimes these regimes are democratic, other times they
        | are not. The ideals are kool aid to sell to the public to
        | garner support for war.
        | 
        | For eg, US has toppled democracies in Haiti and Iran to
        | support corporate interests. It supported dictatorship in
        | Haiti, Saudi, Indonesia, Pakistan, Iran etc to promote
        | the interests of NATO corporations.
 
        | zeraynor wrote:
        | It's neither all "freedom and democracy" nor all
        | "ruthless greed". Your post feels like kool aid in
        | "ruthless greed" direction.
        | 
        | Government decisions are made by human beings in
        | positions of power. Being in a position of power, such as
        | the president of the United States, is a balancing of
        | owns personal beliefs/morality and the interests of the
        | United States. The composition of those components and
        | the position of the pendulum in that balance varies
        | depending on who you are.
        | 
        | Your position supposes nobody with ideals becomes members
        | of government or that members of government somehow
        | compartmentalize American cultural ideals/identity.
        | Plenty of hypocrisy abounds, no doubt, but your take is
        | overly cynical.
 
        | kodah wrote:
        | I like to think of it as, collectively our ideals are a
        | compass. We keep heading North but it doesn't mean we
        | don't get lost walking in circles. It also doesn't
        | preclude that sometimes when we think we're heading North
        | we're actually heading South. Making a mockery of our
        | ideals is like making fun of someone for carrying a
        | compass or dating to shoot an azimuth. Unfortunately a
        | good amount of people inside the US and out like to do
        | that.
 
        | cassianoleal wrote:
        | I believe the thread was about the behaviour of
        | governments, not individuals. Principled and idealistic
        | individuals exist everywhere, including Saudi Arabia as
        | the article shows.
 
    | mjevans wrote:
    | Political independence is desirable. Absolute independence is
    | unlikely and possibly unwise as well in a multi party system.
    | However more choices means less power consolidated by any
    | small number of potentially disagreeable actors.
    | 
    | Say Yes to all sorts of energy. Solar, Wind, even modern
    | Nuclear designed to be safe and with 'waste reduction' steps
    | in mind for partly spent fuel that needs to be processed
    | again at carefully controlled military guarded sites (since
    | these processes can also make weapons).
 
| ngcc_hk wrote:
| Kill a man, chop into pieces and shipped away. Fine now.
| 
| Jail a woman ...
| 
| Do you think they think it is not good from the outside world?
 
| frank_bb wrote:
 
| jfax wrote:
| I'm reminded of how under in the UK a person was made to do
| community service after making a tweet.[1] Obviously not as steep
| of a sentencing, but a prosecution nonetheless. I only point that
| out because reading these headlines now doesn't make me feel
| protective of liberal democracy, it only makes me despair of a
| global trend.
| 
| 1. https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/31/23004339/uk-twitter-
| user-...
 
  | bmitc wrote:
  | This speaks to the myth of decentralized . Because the
  | Internet was hailed as a great invention, with its
  | decentralization bringing us to a sort of knowledge sharing and
  | connectedness eutopia. But now, the Internet and associated
  | technologies are the single greatest medium of centralized
  | control ever.
  | 
  | I always point to Adam Curtis' _All Watched Over by Machines of
  | Ever Loving Grace_ documentary.
 
    | toolz wrote:
    | > But now, the Internet and associated technologies are the
    | single greatest medium of centralized control ever.
    | 
    | I strongly disagree with this assessment. The internet
    | currently facilitates enormous amounts of black market
    | trading in virtually every country in the world. The internet
    | facilitates the only information exchange that can provide
    | privacy guarantees between parties, again in virtually any
    | part of the world. The internet has facilitated coordinating
    | terrorist attacks against the most well funded military
    | powers in the world alongside facilitating sharing cat memes.
    | You can trade digital goods with extreme convenience
    | regardless of centralized sanctions that may otherwise
    | prohibit such trades.
    | 
    | I think you're mistakenly looking at centralized powers
    | utilizing the internet to further their reach to incorrectly
    | surmise that people have less ability today to act outside of
    | the will of centralized planners, which in my opinion, is
    | undeniably, demonstrably false.
 
  | duxup wrote:
  | "democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those
  | other forms that have been tried"
 
  | gotoeleven wrote:
  | Turns out the white wigs they wear are actually clown wigs.
  | 
  | I guess they're on to tweets now because they've rid the island
  | of scissors, kitchen knives and pointy sticks.
 
  | balfirevic wrote:
  | In Croatia, people have been fined for writing ACAB (on Twitter
  | or Facebook), as well as "1312". One journalist has been
  | arrested for publishing satirical song deemed to "insult the
  | nation".
  | 
  | Many judges favorite pastime is extorting money from newspapers
  | and journalists through the lawsuits on account of causing them
  | "mental distress" with their articles.
  | 
  | And police will readily punch the phone out of your hands if
  | you try to record them, citing GDPR.
  | 
  | Often times people on HN will proudly proclaim how Europe has a
  | "different view on free speech" - really, you don't have to
  | remind us.
 
    | space_fountain wrote:
    | Literally a 30+ year jail sentence vs fines. Like don't get
    | me wrong, that seems bad, but not really on the same level
 
  | madrox wrote:
  | Looking at the tweets in question linked from that article [1],
  | many of those are statements of blowing up airports or making
  | death/rape threats. I, for one, appreciate the idea that making
  | death threats online have consequences. Often these are the
  | only signs you get before mentally ill people act on them, and
  | in most cases police can do nothing until an actual crime is
  | committed...usually that crime is murder.
  | 
  | There's a difference between getting arrested for tweeting for
  | social change and for, well, calling for deaths. There's
  | certainly a grey area about "jokes" here, but you haven't been
  | able to joke about "the bomb in your pants" in airport security
  | lines for the entire history of airport security, so it's
  | hardly a new global trend. It's also different when someone
  | with millions of followers "jokes" about something. Before
  | Twitter, this woman would've still been arrested for what she
  | was advocating, and that's what makes her situation awful...not
  | that she got arrested for tweeting.
  | 
  | We should be compassionate when applying the law and continue
  | to figure it out, but let's not throw the baby out with the
  | bathwater.
  | 
  | 1: https://www.theverge.com/2022/2/7/22912054/uk-grossly-
  | offens...
 
  | HL33tibCe7 wrote:
  | A man was given a suspended jail sentence in the UK for making
  | a joke video about Grenfell. To (on the whole) great and
  | uncritical applause from the media and general public.
 
    | space_fountain wrote:
    | Article for those who might be interest:
    | https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/20/man-
    | admits-p....
    | 
    | A 10 week jail sentence for a racist video making fun of a
    | terrible tragedy doesn't bother me as much as locking up
    | political opponents
 
  | blfr wrote:
  | Britain is famous for convicting a guy who got his dog to do
  | the nazi salute. And they just don't stop, they arrested a
  | tweeter the other day along with a guy who filmed the first
  | arrest.
  | 
  | https://fee.org/articles/uk-man-arrested-for-malicious-commu...
 
    | throwawaylinux wrote:
    | Someone should report this guy to them https://images.thewest
    | .com.au/publication/CD15E5C4C89CE4DA25...
 
      | sgjohnson wrote:
      | They exiled him to Canada, no?
      | 
      | Kind of how they exiled King Edward VIII to the Bahamas.
 
    | drak0n1c wrote:
    | BBC government media used to have Monty Python doing
    | satirical nazi salutes on prime time television. Shows how
    | easily standards can change without constitutional
    | protections.
 
    | FooHentai wrote:
    | The nazi dog was in Scotland, this is in England. they are
    | different legal jurisdictions.
    | 
    | Edit: England, not Britain.
 
      | nohuck13 wrote:
      | Scotland occupies the northern third of the island of Great
      | Britain.
 
      | ybaervervys wrote:
      | Solid pedantry attempt, but missed the mark.
      | 
      | Scotland is a part of Britain. Scotland is not part of
      | England nor Wales, but Scotland, England, and Wales are all
      | part of (Great) Britain.
 
        | FooHentai wrote:
        | Appreciate the gotcha, nearly as fun to post as pedantry.
        | I only made the same mistake OP did, however.
        | 
        | The actual point still stands. If you're going to take a
        | dig at a legal system, country, or culture, don't try to
        | back up your point with an example from a different one.
        | 
        | Scotland is not England legally or culturally, and the
        | scots will be the first to make that point clear.
 
        | DiggyJohnson wrote:
        | Please explain how the difference in these legal systems
        | is worth the pedantry.
 
        | UnpossibleJim wrote:
        | Ah, poor Wales. You'd have to murder your wife to sit on
        | the throne there.
 
| potatototoo99 wrote:
| She wasn't sentenced for tweeting, she was sentenced for
| supporting overthrowing the government. Which would also be a
| crime in the US, where she'd be called a "domestic terrorist" and
| sentenced to life. This could be worse, of course, because
| foreign suspects are just imprisoned in CIA black sites forever
| without seeing the inside of a court, or murdered via drone
| strikes.
 
| xanaxagoras wrote:
| Coming to America as well - look up Ricky Vaughn. Trial run on a
| deplorable, your ticket will get called eventually.
 
  | KerrAvon wrote:
  | OK, I did. He told people they could legally vote by posting
  | hashtags to twitter for specific candidates. That's an
  | unethical thing to do even if you aren't a Nazi. Should it be
  | against the law? Well, you might look up the reason these laws
  | exist. Hint: probably won't make Nazis too happy.
  | 
  | https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1360816/downl...
  | 
  | > conspired to injure, oppress, threaten and intimidate persons
  | in the free exercise of a right and privilege secured to them
  | by the Constitution and laws of the United States, to wit, the
  | right to vote, in violation of...
 
  | fauntle wrote:
  | As stupid as it is, there are legitimate legal complaints
  | against him, namely advertising that votes could be texted to a
  | certain phone number.
 
| croes wrote:
| And still Saudi Arabia is treated as an ally of the western
| world.
 
  | lttlrck wrote:
  | "ally" in this case means something like "marriage of
  | convenience"...
 
    | Invictus0 wrote:
    | more like desperation
 
| [deleted]
 
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-17 23:01 UTC)