[HN Gopher] Transfusion of brain fluid from young mice improves ...
___________________________________________________________________
 
Transfusion of brain fluid from young mice improves memory in old
mice
 
Author : gmays
Score  : 127 points
Date   : 2022-05-12 15:30 UTC (7 hours ago)
 
web link (www.statnews.com)
w3m dump (www.statnews.com)
 
| briga wrote:
| Isn't memory also improved by novelty? For instance, your
| memories before and after a major life event (say, a surgery) are
| likely going to be more vivid than your memories around an
| average day (say, day 4000 sitting in a cage). This makes
| evolutionary sense--novel events should take up more of your
| limited memory resources than events you've encountered thousands
| of times before. It also makes me wonder about the methodology
| behind this paper.
 
| natly wrote:
| On the other hand, just being able to rest whenever you need and
| get enough sleep and have time for exersize and great food (which
| rich people have) is already a huge competitive advantage. So a
| similar effect as this would produce is definitely already
| happening.
 
| sudden_dystopia wrote:
| The mice boomers will never relinquish their power now.
 
| 1270018080 wrote:
| Don't let the oligarchs here about this.
 
  | dv_dt wrote:
  | This makes me wonder about transmission of diseases such as
  | prions in that kind of transfusion though. Perhaps better to
  | understand the fundamental process and synthesize the core
  | chemicals involved (if it comes to that).
 
| ada1981 wrote:
| Andrenochrome?
 
| yalogin wrote:
| May be a stupid question but how confident are we that we
| understand memory in mice? Is memory as humans perceive it the
| same as what mice perceive it?
 
  | ninesnines wrote:
  | not a stupid question!
  | 
  | you can classify memory into many different components, and how
  | memory in mice translates into humans is not extremely clear.
  | 
  | we can do experiments that do fear conditioning, or classic
  | conditioning and operant conditioning, but the translation from
  | mice to humans is definitely not clear cut. I think this is one
  | of the biggest weaknesses of the paper actually
 
  | SemanticStrengh wrote:
  | We do not understand memory of humans nor of mices nor of
  | C.elegans. The question of the neural code is an unsolved
  | problem with close to zero progress. However we don't need to,
  | The regions and deficits in memory processing are highly
  | preserved/correlated between mammals. They are many potent
  | Nootropics for memory, such as Dihexa and prl, those are called
  | hypermnesics. A classical one is choline, found in eggs and
  | overlap with the nicotine impact on intelligence
 
| idea55 wrote:
 
  | gtowey wrote:
  | Imortan Jeff?
 
  | geoffeg wrote:
  | Which episode of Futurama is that from? ;)
 
    | idea55 wrote:
    | Real life, different billionaire:
    | 
    | https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/08/peter-thiel-wants-
    | to...
 
| 01100011 wrote:
| I don't have access to the paper but Dr. Charles Brenner seems to
| think that the study was inadequate:
| https://twitter.com/CharlesMBrenner/status/15248703642489528...
| 
| If you're interested in aging topics, he did a recent debate with
| Dr. Aubrey de Grey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJIvp_J-kzM
 
| msie wrote:
| It is so frustrating that the end result is years away. I hope
| that they don't just look for some equivalent micro drug but
| perform experiments with the actual growth factor in human test
| subjects.
 
| strangattractor wrote:
| Science has proved once again that we can cure MICE of just about
| anything. Maybe if we would let them experiment on us we get
| better human results.
 
  | ntoskrnl wrote:
  | Unless you're volunteering to let scientists poke at your
  | brain, mice are the best option we have.
  | https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/why-use-the-mouse-in-resear...
 
    | savant_penguin wrote:
    | Funnily enough, some people volunteered to test/develop (I
    | don't recall which) the COVID vaccine but were turned down
 
| ahurmazda wrote:
| Death is the ultimate equalizer. We take solace in the fact that
| no matter how rich, brutal, tyrannical, comically-villainous one
| is, death will surely come for us all.
| 
| The day old-gizzards figure out how to sip on young-people juice
| and live forever, we are truly screwed.
 
  | hulitu wrote:
  | A criminal is still a criminal even after death.
 
  | [deleted]
 
    | [deleted]
 
  | space_fountain wrote:
  | Huge worry for me as well. Let me remind everyone that aging is
  | mostly about entropy, the exact same thing that causes an
  | engine to inevitably wear out and break down happening to you
  | and just like an engine fixing can't ever be as simple as just
  | applying on procedure to all engines, because a million
  | different things can go wrong, and there are a billion
  | different unique people each with slightly different ways to
  | break down. We're starting to go down a road of designer
  | medicine and it seems very possible to me that some day we'll
  | live in a world that a billionaire willing to spend millions a
  | year can solve their aging. Employ a team of researchers to
  | figure out what's breaking and put it right, but that the
  | average person never will be
 
  | meowface wrote:
  | I think it's the exact opposite. The day being old is no longer
  | a disease and a path to inevitable death will be one of the
  | greatest things to ever happen to humanity, now and forever
  | into the future. Especially if you can retain a youthful,
  | healthy brain and body no matter how old you are.
  | 
  | An old tyrannical movie villain dies and a to-be old tyrannical
  | movie villain is born. Billions of people shouldn't be
  | sentenced to death just because the world might be a bit better
  | off if a few people weren't immortal.
 
    | dangerlibrary wrote:
    | Pretty sure the possible world being lamented in the GP
    | comment is not "everyone gets to live forever and stay
    | healthy and youthful" but instead "there exist expensive,
    | parasitic procedures which will allow some rich people to
    | have drastically extended lifespans."
 
      | inglor_cz wrote:
      | _parasitic procedures_
      | 
      | You can be almost sure that once the underlying mechanism
      | is known, the necessary stuff will be synthetised instead
      | of being transferred from a young person to an older one.
      | If only to guarantee stable supply, consistent quality and
      | rule out accidental transmission of various pathogens from
      | the donor.
 
        | hulitu wrote:
        | As a computer i find your trust in technology amusing.
        | The underlying mechanism of a heart, for example, is
        | known. But they still search for pigs to take hearts for
        | transplant.
 
        | karagenit wrote:
        | I dunno, we understand the underlying mechanism of blood
        | pretty well, but we're still a long way off from being
        | able to (economically) synthesize blood for transfusion.
 
    | kiba wrote:
    | _An old tyrannical movie villain dies and a to-be old
    | tyrannical movie villain is born. Billions of people shouldn
    | 't be sentenced to death just because the world might be a
    | bit better off if a few people weren't immortal._
    | 
    | Tyrants aren't even forever even if they never die of old
    | age. After all, tyrants can meet their end through constantly
    | replacing their followers with yes-men to the point of
    | becoming increasingly detached from reality. This may prevent
    | them from noticing certain features of reality such as
    | military incompetence of their force.
 
    | solfox wrote:
    | Death is a beautiful happening that we should not fear so
    | much. It allows growth and transmutation of stagnant
    | ideology.
 
  | [deleted]
 
  | inglor_cz wrote:
  | For me, death is not the main problem, but the long, drawn out
  | period of slowly coming apart definitely is. I would very much
  | prefer not to spend last 15 years of my life crippled from
  | multiple degenerative diseases of old age.
  | 
  | Most of the longevity research is trying to stretch healthspan.
  | Stretching lifespan as such is a nice side effect.
  | 
  | We aren't likely to live forever anyway.
 
    | kiba wrote:
    | Living longer is entangled with living healthier anyway.
 
    | noneeeed wrote:
    | Having watched my mum, and now my dad decline in old age I
    | couldn't agree more.
    | 
    | I don't like the idea of dying, but the slow slide into
    | immobile sinility is positively terrifying.
    | 
    | I'm in my 40s. I've resolved to look after my health not to
    | live longer, but to extend my health for as long as possible.
    | I'm determined to stay active, mobile and
    | socially/intelectually engaged for as long as I can, partly
    | for my self, but also for my kids.
 
  | kiba wrote:
  | Death is just a horrible thing that happens. The facts that it
  | come equally for both heroes and villains doesn't change that.
 
    | atoav wrote:
    | Death is just a thing that happens. Whether it is horrible,
    | sad, a relief or a reason to celebrate depends on whom you
    | ask about whose death at which point in time.
    | 
    | The suicide of Hitler certainly was a horrible tragedy to his
    | close family and those who believed into him -- for many
    | others it was a reason to celebrate. Similarily death of a
    | young family member can be traumatic to the max, while the
    | death of grandmother which everybody (including herself)
    | already accepted and comes after a live well lived can be
    | even have a certain beauty to it.
    | 
    | Death is not that simple.
 
| daenz wrote:
| There's a number of comments here poking fun at the "conspiracy
| theory" aspect of this. Do people really believe it is a "crazy
| idea" that ultra rich amoral people would fund research into
| controversial life and health extension, even at the expense at
| younger people?
 
| beached_whale wrote:
| I wonder how long until this is a thing some people do; like the
| blood transfusions from younger/healthy people.
 
  | kornhole wrote:
  | Russell manages to give a laugh at even the most disturbing
  | topics. Here is is his show about the huge industry of blood
  | extraction. https://youtu.be/82pOL361zUk
 
  | SemanticStrengh wrote:
  | Btw we can significantly increase blood production via Epo. The
  | question is wether blood from cows/pigs rejuvenate. It could
  | get an industrial scale.
 
  | zuminator wrote:
  | Better would be if there's a way to mass produce the fluid in a
  | lab.
 
  | rossdavidh wrote:
  | My immediate first thought on reading the headline.
 
  | bitwize wrote:
  | Gavin Belson is going to have a brain boy in his dotage.
 
  | thebeardisred wrote:
  | Apparently you, rossdavidh, and I are all on the same
  | wavelength.
  | 
  | I was imagining Elon and Jeff keeping a stable with the
  | equivalent of vampire "blood bags".
 
    | pc86 wrote:
    | I mean there's a Silicon Valley episode where Gavin has a
    | "blood boy."
 
      | JacobThreeThree wrote:
      | For the curious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBA0AH-
      | LSbo
 
    | mcguire wrote:
    | " _We drink elixirs that we refine_
    | 
    |  _From the juices of the dying_ "
    | 
    | Shriekback, Nemesis, 1985.
 
  | NGRhodes wrote:
  | It's a new market for Jiffylube.
 
  | heavyset_go wrote:
  | It'll always creep me out that medical vampirism is a thing.
 
    | ClumsyPilot wrote:
    | How long untill our billionairs people will be basically like
    | aztec gods demanding human sacrafice for new organs
 
      | pphysch wrote:
      | Yesterday
 
| tomcam wrote:
| Me to my kid: So, did you have a good day?
| 
| My kid: Sure, pops, why?
| 
| Me:Well, I have a little favor to ask...
 
| pengaru wrote:
| Haven't similar things been observed with blood transfusions of
| young blood into the elderly, which was then found to actually be
| unnecessary - even just diluting the blood with something neutral
| and clean produced similar results.
| 
| "The solution to pollution is dilution"
 
  | ninesnines wrote:
  | same lab actually!
 
  | candiddevmike wrote:
  | All the more reason to donate blood.
 
    | mullingitover wrote:
    | Actually it was nothing to do with adding/removing blood, the
    | treatment worked with synthetic serum albumin[1].
    | 
    | [1] https://www.lifespan.io/news/recombinant-serum-albumin-
    | incre...
 
    | noneeeed wrote:
    | I believe there are good health reasons to donate. I forget
    | the details, but it stimulates positive processes in the
    | body. I think the effect is marginal, but it's nice to know
    | you get a small personal bonus from doing something nice for
    | other people.
 
      | throwntoday wrote:
      | I've actually been regularly donating for years for that
      | very reason. I figured my body will just create new blood
      | to fill in the gap and much like changing power steering
      | fluid, after enough time it's mostly new stuff.
 
        | allendoerfer wrote:
        | But your blood is created by cells dividing and they
        | cannot do so unlimited. Your DNA shortens and you run out
        | of room for mistakes proteins make while translating it.
 
    | entangledqubit wrote:
    | Now I just need to figure out how to donate brain fluid...
 
      | aeternum wrote:
      | Brain fluid = spinal fluid, sampling it is a somewhat
      | common procedure, just a larger needle and more
      | uncomfortable.
 
        | amelius wrote:
        | And I suppose a larger failure and fatality rate (?)
 
  | api wrote:
  | Could it be this simple? Shit just builds up in the blood that
  | the liver and kidneys and stuff are not 100% efficient at
  | removing? So you just need to... get rid of it or dilute it?
  | 
  | I mean that can't possibly be a full solution but could a major
  | "win" on life span or at least health span be as simple as some
  | kind of dialysis session?
  | 
  | Could this also be a hidden mechanism involved in some of that
  | hyperbaric oxygen chamber evidence for life/health extension?
  | Maybe all that oxygen oxidizes and destroys some of this stuff.
 
    | bawolff wrote:
    | I don't understand why dilluting it would work here - either
    | its filterable and it would get filtered regardless (e.g.
    | drinking water would be enough) or it wont be and the
    | dillutant would just be filtered
 
    | pengaru wrote:
    | My lay person assumption is it's more complicated than that,
    | just knowing how the body is always conserving resources and
    | adapting to changing conditions. I'd expect the body's
    | natural mechanisms responsible for this to wind down
    | operations the more you intervened on its behalf.
    | 
    | It's obviously the right choice in the elderly/ill, but for a
    | healthy young person maybe it's better to exercise/strengthen
    | the body's natural abilities in these departments. I think
    | one of the arguments for intermittent fasting is to clean up
    | the detritus being kept around for energy sake, via natural
    | mechanisms...
 
      | DoreenMichele wrote:
      | Exercise and fasting are two known and proven ways to clean
      | up the tissues of the body, yes.
 
        | SemanticStrengh wrote:
        | And most importantly, sleep and the glymphatic system.
        | There are many substances that promote Autophagy though.
 
        | DoreenMichele wrote:
        | For the brain, yes.
        | 
        | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25427090
 
    | SemanticStrengh wrote:
    | It is that simple to some extent, recycling and resource
    | control is a major factor in aging. Targets: Autophagy,
    | senolytics (don't take senolytics), lysosomes, metabolic
    | rate, proteasome,chaperone proteins,amyloids,Lipofuscin.
    | 
    | The best example of stuff literally accumulating
    | macroscopically in your body (besides the impressive images
    | of Lipofuscin) is metals accumulation in bones. They cause a
    | lot of damage, including a major cause of neurodegeneration.
    | They can be removed via chelators.
    | 
    | BTW I would avoid hyperbaric at all cost even if hornesis is
    | a thing. Oxygen is literally the reason we are all slowly
    | dying, we oxidize and implode. But don't refrain from
    | breathing, hypoxia incurs more damage. If you want to prevent
    | oxidation you need Skq1.
 
    | [deleted]
 
  | jasfi wrote:
  | So drinking more water would be enough?
 
    | pengaru wrote:
    | This isn't my area of expertise at all.
    | 
    | A personal experience that comes to mind is when my childhood
    | cat developed kidney disease.
    | 
    | She drank plenty of water, urinated excessively, and her
    | blood still became toxic without regular (~daily)
    | intervention in the form of adding saline to her blood
    | intravenously. Like a light switch she'd resume normal life
    | after the saline bag emptied into her blood, then slowly
    | become ill again in the next 24-48hrs.
 
      | sitkack wrote:
      | You must have loved that cat very much.
 
        | samstave wrote:
        | No, he just had a lot of extra saline.
        | 
        | J/K
        | 
        | ---
        | 
        | I had a cat when I was in my 20s that got into a fight
        | some eve...
        | 
        | Its face got infected and blew up. It was $8,000 for
        | surgery, and I couldnt afford it - so had to put her
        | down... but I did love that cat, and I would have paid it
        | if I had it...
 
        | Karawebnetwork wrote:
        | Pet insurances are very useful for such situations. They
        | cover you for big surgeries and make those small
        | procedures almost invisible in your monthly budgets.
 
        | ntoskrnl wrote:
        | My cat had (likely) something similar and needed to
        | regularly be given subcutaneous saline fluid. He learned
        | pretty quick to associate me stabbing him, with him
        | feeling better. That kind of thing becomes easy once you
        | get into the routine.
 
        | pengaru wrote:
        | You've jogged my memory, it was subcutaneous not
        | intravenous for my childhood cat as well. The saline
        | would form a bulge under the skin before diffusing into
        | the body. It wasn't something I did myself, we were
        | bringing our cat to the vet to have it done until my
        | parents tired of it.
 
      | three_seagrass wrote:
      | Was the cat checked for diabetes?
      | 
      | Excessively drinking water, excessive urination, and renal
      | failure are all co-morbidities for cats. Either way, kudos
      | for helping them.
 
        | pengaru wrote:
        | Honestly I don't really know what all was checked. We
        | brought her into the vet when she wasn't eating and
        | behaving lethargically, they said her kidneys were
        | failing and we'd have to bring her in regularly for
        | saline bags or learn to administer them ourselves.
 
        | nobody9999 wrote:
        | >Was the cat checked for diabetes?
        | 
        | >Excessively drinking water, excessive urination, and
        | renal failure are all co-morbidities for cats. Either
        | way, kudos for helping them.
        | 
        | Those particular symptoms are common (in cats at least)
        | to feline hyperthyroidism, which is significantly more
        | common than feline diabetes.
        | 
        | Not saying it wasn't Diabetes, but Hyperthyroidism seems
        | more likely.
 
        | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
        | possibly related:
        | https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cats+flame+retardant
 
| samstave wrote:
| This is why I want a personal stem-cell account.
| 
| I would like an account of various bodily components, grown from
| my personal stem-cells, for injection / growth / use as I see
| fit.
| 
| My Stem Cells My Choice.
| 
| ---
| 
| (for example, I want to regrow my eyeballs.)
 
  | SemanticStrengh wrote:
  | > My Stem Cells My Choice We need a political movement Strong
  | agree but I'm not aware wether adult stem cells can be grown
  | into whole organs. It's true that e.g the spleen can respawn
  | after ablation so definitely not impossible. Although of course
  | the graal is your sperm, it is a DNA that is 0 years old, you
  | can't make it any younger! Growing foetuses without brains
  | might be a real possibility and the ultimate medecine
  | breakthrough.
  | 
  | Note that your eyeball metabolism can be significantly
  | rejuvenated, e.g retinalamin often reverse blindness in humans.
  | Or Skq1/visomiten. Glaucoma and macular degeneration are
  | totally solved problems. As for myself I want to shrink my
  | eyeballs (myopia) but this is not pharmacologically doable
  | (because extremely undefunded) although Berberine do very
  | significantly slow the myopia progress.
 
| patbwill wrote:
| Seems a perfect movie plot: A villain kidnaps children to extract
| brain fluid looking for the immortality :-(
 
  | yazaddaruvala wrote:
  | This is basically the side-plot of
  | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_Ascending
 
  | bigodbiel wrote:
  | Q Productions presents!
  | 
  | As conspiracy theory, it predates Trump/Qanon, we've had David
  | Icke with his adrenochrome from children sucking reptilian
  | royalties
 
  | klyrs wrote:
  | Turn that to 11; Tad Williams' Otherland is among my favorite
  | reads.
 
| abduhl wrote:
| Finally we have a way for the old to use and take advantage of
| the future they've stolen from the younger generations over the
| past two decades.
 
| davesque wrote:
| These kinds of articles give me the creeps. As interesting as the
| science is, I imagine this also encourages a bunch of silicon
| valley millionaires and billionaires to essentially become
| vampires.
 
  | daenz wrote:
  | The show Silicon Valley had a small story arc that involved
  | this kind of thing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBA0AH-LSbo
 
  | aeternum wrote:
  | Vampires are unbecoming.
  | 
  | This is why the SV billionaires need to create the metaverse.
  | The matrix had a the right idea, just keep the young plugged in
  | to VR and use machines to do the dirty work.
 
  | [deleted]
 
  | NegativeLatency wrote:
  | Blood boy -> brain boy
 
  | Karawebnetwork wrote:
  | On the reverse side of the coin, I would love to be able to
  | extend the life of my parents by giving them liquids that my
  | body is able to replenish.
 
    | davesque wrote:
    | Very good counter point :).
 
| ninesnines wrote:
| this above article is kind of inflammatory, however, this paper
| is incredibly interesting.
| 
| I read it this morning and the concept of changing CSF in order
| to have an increase in oligodendrocyte progenitor cell
| proliferation and differentiation is such a creative idea; a lot
| of the idea has focused on increasing flow in order to move
| waste, etc with csf. I think this concept that CSF is also acting
| as an important mechanism to moving factors that will cause up
| regulation, etc, is very novel.
| 
| honestly one of my favourite papers in the last five years, I am
| obsessed.
 
  | s1artibartfast wrote:
  | Modifying CSF turnover is not particularly novel, but I do
  | think it is generally overlooked. CSF production cycling is
  | greatly reduced in the elderly and and there are a lot of
  | connections to memory diseases such as alzheimers.
  | 
  | A few medical device startups have attacked the problem with
  | promising results. Unfortunately, VC and national funding orgs
  | aren't particularly interested in device based solutions
  | because pills and injections are perpetually 5 years out.
  | 
  | I'm aware of at least one that was able to halt or reverse
  | alzheimers in a 200 patient trial, but folded after they
  | couldnt get funding to move forward.
 
    | SemanticStrengh wrote:
    | I remember seeing a drug/substance that potentiated the
    | glymphatic system filtration but I just can't find it again,
    | it's been a year..
 
    | ninesnines wrote:
    | yes yes I know that increasing CSF flow is not that novel
    | (anymore e.g. last couple of years). you can increase it with
    | cerebral blood flow, and you can do this with sleep,
    | respiration, visual stimuli, etc.
    | 
    | however, the ideas of 1) replacing csf from young to older
    | mice and 2) the idea that there are factors in CSF that are
    | being delivered to other areas of the brain and promoting
    | cell proliferation: that's pretty novel.
    | 
    | all of the literature right now points to csf in terms of
    | waste clearance and csf is painted as almost a river that
    | picks up components and moves waste (e.g. amyloid beta) from
    | the periarterial areas in the parenchyma and then out through
    | the perivenous areas into the lymphatic system. and this
    | means that the idea of delivery of promoting factors is
    | really interesting.
 
    | mleonhard wrote:
    | Can you share any more information about the medical device
    | that showed efficacy against Alzheimers in the 200-patient
    | trial?
 
      | s1artibartfast wrote:
      | This is one that I thought was compelling.[1] The trial
      | ultimately failed but if you read the results the post-hoc
      | analysis, it showed promise in mild and moderate subgroups
      | of the ITT population. Most drugs today don't even target
      | mild AD, but go after pre-symptomatic patients.
      | 
      | There was also benefit across most measures, but just not
      | of statistical significance.
      | 
      | The trial had some major problems with appropriate
      | controls, and is widely cited as a poster child for why the
      | FDA should not require a control group to undergo invasive
      | brain-surgery, and how this can taint the results.
      | 
      | It also showed a 89% reduction in amyloid Beta, the same
      | proxy measure Biogen's aducanumab was recently approved
      | based on.
      | 
      | https://n.neurology.org/content/neurology/71/3/202.full.pdf
 
  | mwint wrote:
  | I'm curious, what is your favorite paper of all time (the
  | specification of 'last five years' sounds like it's not this
  | one?)
 
    | SemanticStrengh wrote:
    | I don't have a favorite but one that stands out is the
    | resuscitation of cryogenized hamsters https://royalsocietypub
    | lishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.1956.005...
 
      | ninesnines wrote:
      | holy cinnamon I've never seen this -- brilliant
 
    | ninesnines wrote:
    | ah there are a lot of really nice old nature/science
    | neuroscience articles that are really clear! papers were more
    | simple and clear 20 years ago
 
      | SemanticStrengh wrote:
      | The papers from the 90s are generally my favorites.
 
| bigodbiel wrote:
| Yay another hip SV startup just around the corner!
 
| jamal-kumar wrote:
| not content with our blood and feces, now boomers are after our
| cerebrospinal fluid
 
| vmception wrote:
| Just don't do it to the Eldians.
| 
| In all seriousness, I wonder if this can be synthesized. A
| transport layer for brain conductivity, just replace the fluid.
| Maybe create an even better fluid than what the young hosts have.
 
  | Llamamoe wrote:
  | Not quite the same, but there exists a nootrooic called
  | Cerebrolysin which is made from enzymatically treated pig brain
  | peptides, including all sorts of brain growth factors.
 
    | vasco wrote:
    | I wonder if taking something with brain growth factors makes
    | you more or less likely to suffer from more serious
    | consequences if you have brain trauma. ie Are you more or
    | less likely to have a serious concussion after hitting your
    | head.
 
      | SemanticStrengh wrote:
      | I cannot answer your question but growth factors are
      | extremely effective after a concussion/AVC/TBI/stroke.
      | People and doctors are extremely uneducated and therefore
      | people that have TBI will have high persistent damage. The
      | truth is, most of the damage is generally not done during
      | the trauma, but during the weeks/month following it.. And
      | those damages can be for the most part prevented by taking
      | protectors, which as I said, isn't done in practice because
      | science bad
 
  | a9h74j wrote:
  | > just replace the fluid
  | 
  | Jiffy Brain franchises on the way.
 
    | vmception wrote:
    | Imagine the fraudulent upsells.
 
      | abracadaniel wrote:
      | Your nasal filters are covered in a mucus, do you want us
      | to replace them?
 
      | monkeybutton wrote:
      | I hear you can go an extra 4,000 hours between changes with
      | synthetics.
 
| spacephysics wrote:
| In before the AJ people start saying "see?! Adrenochromes!"
| 
| Surely this will give more fuel to the conspiratorial fire.
 
  | noneeeed wrote:
  | Who are the "AJ people"? Is this yet another bunch of
  | conspiracy nutters?
 
| black_13 wrote:
| Jeff will be harvesting the cerebrospinal fluid of his interns
 
| SemanticStrengh wrote:
| See also cerebrolysin in humans. Yes google it. Now.
 
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-05-12 23:00 UTC)