[HN Gopher] Mathematically inspired typefaces
___________________________________________________________________
 
Mathematically inspired typefaces
 
Author : sohkamyung
Score  : 51 points
Date   : 2021-06-25 10:58 UTC (2 days ago)
 
web link (www.nytimes.com)
w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
 
| mettamage wrote:
| The son (Erik Demaine) of this father and son team is a good
| teacher.
| 
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNeL18KsWPc&list=PLUl4u3cNGP...
 
  | [deleted]
 
| IAmGraydon wrote:
| > The verb "puzzle" -- to perplex or confuse, bewilder or bemuse
| -- is of unknown origin.
| 
| It's pretty discouraging when the first sentence is patently
| incorrect.
| 
| https://www.archimedes-lab.org/puzzle_etymology.html
 
  | svat wrote:
  | Anyone can state an etymology with more certainty than
  | warranted; that doesn't mean the etymology is actually known.
  | The page you quoted says:
  | 
  | > The word _Puzzle_ comes from _pusle_ "bewilder, confound"
  | which is a frequentive of the obsolete verb _pose_ (from
  | Medieval French _aposer_ ) in sense of "perplex".
  | 
  | But etymonline (Douglas Harper's Online Etymology Dictionary)
  | says (https://www.etymonline.com/word/puzzle):
  | 
  | > 1590s, _pusle_ "bewilder, confound, perplex with difficult
  | problems or questions," possibly frequentative of _pose_ (v.)
  | in obsolete sense of  "perplex" (compare _nuzzle_ from _nose_
  | ).
  | 
  | Note the word "possibly". Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/w
  | /index.php?title=Puzzle&oldid=1029...) says:
  | 
  | > The etymology of the verb _puzzle_ is described by [the
  | _Oxford English Dictionary_ ] as "unknown"; unproven hypotheses
  | regarding its origin include an Old English verb _puslian_
  | meaning  'pick out', and a derivation of the verb _pose_.
  | 
  | And this is the full note in the version of OED I have access
  | to:
  | 
  | > _[Note. For the etymology of puzzle the first question is the
  | relation of the n. and vb. The vb. has been held to be derived
  | from the n., and the latter viewed as an aphetic form of
  | apposal or opposal. But the chronology of the words, and still
  | more the consideration of their sense-history, seem to make it
  | clear that the verb came first, and that the n. was its
  | derivative. In the light of this, the vb. has been referred to
  | pose v. 2, as a diminutive (or other derivative formation), as
  | in suck, suckle. This is phonetically possible: cf. nuzzle from
  | nose. But there are serious difficulties in the signification.
  | Of the earlier sense of puzzle, as seen in the examples under
  | 1a above, no trace appears in the original sense of pose and
  | appose `to examine by putting questions ', and it is only the
  | derivative senses 2 of pose and 1c of puzzle that come into
  | contact. Thus their relation seems to be that of two words
  | originally distinct, which (as in some other cases) have
  | subsequently attracted each other. Puzzle was possibly the same
  | verb of which the pa. pple. poselet occurs late in the 14th c.,
  | app. in the sense `bewildered, confused, confounded', and
  | which, riming with hoselet, i.e. huselet, housled, was prob.
  | pronounced ('pu:z@let), which would regularly give by 1600
  | ('pUzled), later ('p^zled). The non-appearance of the verb
  | during the intervening 200 years might be owing to its being
  | one of the colloquial words which came into literary use in the
  | 16th c. This is however conjectural and, even if true, leaves
  | the ulterior derivation still to seek. (A verb of similar form
  | appears in late OE. puslian `to pick out best pieces of food'
  | (Sweet), = Du. peuzelen to pick, to piddle, LG. poseln,
  | pusseln, Norw. pusla; but it is difficult to see in its sense
  | any connexion with that of `puzzle'.)]_
 
| TheRealNGenius wrote:
| Mathematical fonts for curiosity rather than utility
 
| yamchah2 wrote:
| Anyone know how I can read this without making an account?
 
  | zksmk wrote:
  | If you're using Firefox, there are extensions that let you view
  | an archived version of a webpage with a click. Almost every
  | interesting article with a soft paywall I bump into has already
  | been archived by someone. I use "web archives" and "save to the
  | wayback machine" but there are others, and I'm sure there's
  | something for Chromium browsers too.
 
  | chinmaykunkikar wrote:
  | Yes. Try this bookmarklet called Readium
  | (https://sugoidesune.github.io/readium/).
  | 
  | It works great for NYTimes, Medium, Bloomberg.
  | 
  | Some more info about this - On Medium, it only works on urls
  | with 'medium.com' in them. Won't work on other custom Medium
  | domains (like betterprogramming.pub) because of a CORS related
  | issue. It works by fooling the site by making a fetch() call to
  | the current url without sending cookies to the site.
 
  | sverona wrote:
  | Prepend https://archive.is/ to the URL.
 
  | FabHK wrote:
  | Usually I read the NYT with JavaScript disabled, but while that
  | does display the text, it doesn't show the illustrations and
  | fonts...
 
| ghusbands wrote:
| https://archive.is/Yc7ae
 
| svat wrote:
| Play with the fonts here: http://erikdemaine.org/fonts/ -- for
| each one, there's a webpage which lets you enter your own text,
| and also has some information about that typeface and related
| mathematics. These fonts are of course more about the latter (can
| we create letter shapes subject to these constraints) than
| anything you'd set a page of text in, but that doesn't make them
| any less fun.
 
| slver wrote:
| Wow. Terrible.
 
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-06-27 23:00 UTC)