|
| catchmeifyoucan wrote:
| What blew my mind most was the subtle brand placements. Bear App,
| and Gitpod - never used these things before, and now I'm reading
| about them.
|
| This is a really cool website! Well done.
| statictype wrote:
| The damn thing is responsive too. Amazing
| threesquared wrote:
| I love how the meta description still says "Web site created
| using create-react-app"
| gaoryrt wrote:
| good good
| agmm wrote:
| Go to the terminal an run "cat my-dream.cpp"
| 29athrowaway wrote:
| He also created this: https://cube.zxh.io/
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| I'm glad that you noticed this project, have fun!
| 29athrowaway wrote:
| It's pretty neat although I am unfamiliar with the algorithms
| for cubing, it looks pretty neat.
| temporallobe wrote:
| In the terminal, type rm -rf for a special treat...
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| I'm glad you found that hahah
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| I never expected so much attention and feedback, thank you all!
|
| Also, if you want to see a portfolio simulating Deepin (a Linux
| distribution) developed with Vue, check this:
|
| https://goodmanwen.github.io/
| mjthompson wrote:
| The attention to detail is breathtaking.
| raju wrote:
| This has been echoed in virtually every comment here, but I have
| to say it--This is brilliant. Everything about it is stellar!
|
| It really looks like MacOS (I made the same mistake as
| @chrismorgan in another comment) and accidentally closed the tab
| with [?]-w). The attention to detail, the easter eggs--I really
| have no words but to say, great work! Wow.
| satysin wrote:
| This is fantastically done. Great job!
| LaputanMachine wrote:
| You can even open the website recursively within its own "Safari"
| window. The recursion depth seems to be limited to one though.
| Nice easter egg nonetheless.
|
| Edit: It's possible to bypass the recursion limit. First open the
| "Blog" bookmark on the Safari start page. Use Inspect Element on
| the "portfolio" link at the top right, and remove
| target="_blank"
|
| from the HTML. Open the portfolio and enjoy infinite recursion.
| spamalot159 wrote:
| Someone should try to write a copy of this inside the VSCode
| editor in the site.
| FeelTheBerns wrote:
| Bruh
| h4l0 wrote:
| I didn't experience a recursion limit when I just tried it.
| Maybe the site was updated after your comment? I'm using
| Firefox.
| LaputanMachine wrote:
| It's still not working for me for some reason.
|
| In the second recursion step, when entering the URL manually,
| the tab remains blank. If I instead try to click on the
| unedited "portfolio" link, the site opens in a new (native)
| tab.
|
| Happens on Safari and Firefox (macOS) as well as Chromium
| (Debian).
| neogodless wrote:
| I did notice if you have a trailing slash, and you remove
| it... it usually loads then.
| neogodless wrote:
| Same here - Firefox on Windows 10. I only went about three
| deep but... neat!
| auroranil wrote:
| Interesting. It is using iframes behind the scenes. According
| to W3C it should limit the recursion depth to one, but it seems
| that you can get around that.
|
| Relevant: https://www.bryanbraun.com/2021/03/24/infinitely-
| nested-ifra...
| hit8run wrote:
| The future of the desktop? Bring your phone, connect it to a big
| screen and use the webdesktop?
| EvilEy3 wrote:
| You can already do that with Android.
| [deleted]
| FabHK wrote:
| Haha :-) In the Terminal: zou@macbook-pro ~ > cat
| my-dream.cpp while(sleeping) { money++;
| }
| TradingPlaces wrote:
| That's the headline feature
| thomasjudge wrote:
| Responsiveness is very good
| julienreszka wrote:
| "Copying is our superpower"
| frereubu wrote:
| This is fun, but in some ways it's too good - after a minute
| playing around with it I went to use command + W to close a
| terminal window and of course it closed the browser window!
| jhgb wrote:
| You meant "too bad", since you'd expect a "too good"
| implementation to actually close the terminal window?
| isomorph wrote:
| It was "too good" in the sense that it was realistic enough
| that they forgot they were in a simulation, and thought the
| terminal window was a real native macOS window
| jhgb wrote:
| But a realistic simulation would have closed the terminal
| window.
| isomorph wrote:
| It was realistic enough to make them expect that their
| keyboard shortcut would close the window. It wasn't
| realistic enough to actually do that. So the visual UI
| was too realistic for them to not have that expectation,
| but the behaviour was not realistic enough for it to
| fulfil the expectation.
| jhgb wrote:
| That's what seemed confusing to me, since "it was so
| realistic that it didn't do what I expected when I
| pressed a certain key combination" seemed like a weird
| juxtaposition. Maybe it was the dash...
| Kiro wrote:
| You're completely missing the point.
| jhgb wrote:
| That is always possible but also often far from certain.
| m_antis89 wrote:
| Do keep up your self-righteous attitude. It will benefit
| you greatly in 5-10 years and we need more like you.
| jhgb wrote:
| Why, is something specific scheduled to happen in 5-10
| years?
|
| Also, I'm not sure why I should consider myself "acting
| in accord with divine or moral law". I've never done even
| that, much less have I been "convinced of [my] own
| righteousness especially in contrast with the actions and
| beliefs of others". That would seem utterly pointless.
| reasonabl_human wrote:
| Responds to accusations of self-righteousness via a self-
| righteous pedantic critique. Too bad you can't use the
| clown emoji on HN ;)
| jhgb wrote:
| > self-righteous
|
| Again, I'm not even striving to be "acting in accord with
| divine or moral law". So, no.
| Aeolun wrote:
| Wouldn't self-righteous for an atheist be more like
| 'acting in accordance with my personal moral law'?
|
| Or maybe more acting like your own personal morals are
| superior to everyone elses.
| jhgb wrote:
| Maybe, but "my personal moral law" doesn't even come into
| play here, so I don't see how it could be possibly
| relevant. The topic is not a morality question so it's a
| category error.
| chrismorgan wrote:
| When I was done looking around I tried the litmus test of
| Ctrl+W (erase word) in a terminal, given that Ctrl+U (erase
| line) had already worked. And that was the end of that (Linux,
| Ctrl+W closes the tab). :-)
| ftio wrote:
| I did the same. After using the site's Spotlight once, I used
| Cmd+Space to try it again and was blown away by how complete
| the app list was. "The attention to detail is incredible," I
| thought. "These are almost the exact apps I have on _my_ Mac. "
|
| Haven't had my Saturday-morning coffee yet, but I think the
| realism and attention to detail are really impressive. (Check
| out the Terminal app if you haven't.)
| FabHK wrote:
| > but in some ways it's too good
|
| Indeed. I typed "rm -rf /" into the "terminal" in the web
| browser, and it cost me quite some nerve to actually hit Enter.
| imapeopleperson wrote:
| Why are you even looking for a job?
| jspash wrote:
| Have you seen how many Javascript dev there are out there? I
| wish I was kidding, but I don't remember the last time a CV
| crossed my desk that didn't have JS as a core ability or at
| least mentioned in passing. And that's for non-webdev roles.
| Data analysts and BI is what we've been hiring for lately. And
| it seems like everyone these days likes to dabble at the
| weekend in some JS.
|
| But yea you are correct, this person would have no trouble
| getting hired.
| kyawzazaw wrote:
| Work visa issues
| leeoniya wrote:
| > using React
|
| and a performance profile shows absolutely insane JS overhead (in
| React) when simply dragging a window. compare this to something
| like https://nextapps-de.github.io/winbox/, and you start to
| wonder if "the React way" is really best-suited for everything
| that people use it for.
| ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
| That's awesome!
|
| Great portfolio!
| dorianmariefr wrote:
| I'm pretty sure some people enter their real passwords :)
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Yeah, this has already happened :)
| xialvjun wrote:
| Impressive. All your works.
| davnicwil wrote:
| This is absolutely amazing.
|
| It's so convincing that, on an iPhone, I went to one of the
| applications with camera, got a camera permission dialog, assumed
| it was part of the mocked up UI and clicked through... then was a
| bit surprised to see that it was actually using my camera feed!
|
| The UI was of course the actual iOS safari permission dialog :-)
| [deleted]
| crazypython wrote:
| It includes its own terminal: https://i.imgur.com/sdxOHqr.png
|
| I was able to play the alpha of my game in the embedded Safari!
| https://i.imgur.com/PWCYEZP.png
|
| Really interesting how iframes are an underused tool.
| sverhagen wrote:
| Isn't that the backlash of them having been an overused tool in
| the past?
| jonas_kgomo wrote:
| Frist I was like, this is really cool, then I started thinking
| what inspired you to do this, as I noticed that most things are
| functional: vs code works, search works etc.
| deadcoder0904 wrote:
| This is so fucking cool. `cat` doesn't work in Terminal. Probably
| put a bunch of basic commands for someone curious.
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| That's strange, `cat` is supposed to work well. What did you
| `cat`?
| tyingq wrote:
| You probably cat-ted a directory, like the "about" directory.
| floydnoel wrote:
| I used `cat my-dream.cpp` with no issue
| danielmeskin wrote:
| Worked for me, what did you `cat`?
| FabHK wrote:
| `cat` works just fine, but `more` or `less` are "not installed"
| :-)
| jfmercer wrote:
| This is brilliant work! I hope that Apple doesn't hit you with a
| takedown order.
| s09dfhks wrote:
| Some advice: Remove the furry stuff. No ones going to want to
| work with you
| EvilEy3 wrote:
| Not a fan of furry, but wouldn't mind as long as they keep that
| stuff in their personal life outside of work.
| epse wrote:
| Why?
| sgt wrote:
| Dragging windows is extremely slow.
| blunte wrote:
| The fake terminal had impressively low typing latency.
|
| Overall this portfolio was really well done!
| Thomaschris wrote:
| Wow!! Very cool!!
| amitmerchant wrote:
| If you want to see Ubuntu 20.04 in action, check this.
|
| https://vivek9patel.github.io/
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| I noticed this Ubuntu themed portfolio after spending two or
| three days on my project. Its awesome and give me much
| inspiration, many thanks to the author. So I'm not the first
| one to think of the idea hhh.
| neogodless wrote:
| After playing with inception on the original, and seeing
| this... I couldn't resist trying this:
|
| https://imgur.com/a/qTcOqAv
| tiborsaas wrote:
| It's really fun, but after spending a few minutes playing with
| the app, I haven't seen his works and don't remember who made
| this.
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| In fact I have the same concern with you. This is my first
| React project and I just started it for learning propose. Then
| I need some content to fill it, so I put some of my information
| and projects in. After that, just as what you said, I realized
| that this "portfolio website" is a little bit too much for my
| poor open-source projects hahaha.
|
| Any way, this project is just for fun and I never expected to
| find a job through this. Thank you for liking it!
| ricardobayes wrote:
| How did you host this?
| luke2m wrote:
| looks like vercel
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Yep, vercel.
| max23_ wrote:
| This is neat! You also did the auto-complete for the terminal
| (muscle memory as I 'tab' on it) :)
| montebicyclelo wrote:
| Fantastic. Very fun, with great attention to detail, e.g. the
| dock animations.
| Liskni_si wrote:
| First thing that came to my mind when I opened this: hey let's
| test if maximization is just as broken as in real MacOS. And oh
| my god it is indeed! Safari won't maximize to the entire screen,
| just like in the real thing, and other apps like the terminal
| maximize correctly. Wow, this level of attention to detail is
| really crazy! :-)
| charrondev wrote:
| I quite like window management through
| https://magnet.crowdcafe.com/ magnet.
|
| You get keyboard shortcuts for tiling things and can drag/snap
| to edges of the screen.
| resist_futility wrote:
| Double click the top/title bar to maximize a window, it's
| easier to hit since you have one giant area at the top of the
| window to click on too
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| macOS's zoom functionality isn't broken, it's just content-size
| based rather than screen-size based: I like this, but some
| applications to implement the necessary hints and so it falls
| back to zooming to full screen.
|
| macOS's resizing has some useful functionality here: dragging
| an edge resizes in that direction, double-clicking an edge
| maximizes in that direction (including diagonally) and
| option+any of these resizes the opposite side of the window as
| well. So, if you hold option and double-click a corner, it'll
| do a Windows-style maximize.
| thiht wrote:
| > macOS's zoom functionality isn't broken, it's just content-
| size based rather than screen-size based
|
| So it is indeed broken. The fact that it's not humanly
| possible to fullscreen Safari without Spectacle/Rectangle
| clearly means it's broken, whether it's what th ey wanted or
| not.
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| I generally prefer the content-based zoom functionality.
| This is a case of people not used to the Mac conventions
| disliking that Macs don't work like Windows.
|
| And, as I've pointed out, both behaviors are possible on
| macOS out of the box.
| thiht wrote:
| > I generally prefer the content-based zoom functionality
|
| Why? This makes absolutely no sense. It's the same thing
| as macOS' windows not closing when you close them. It's
| stupid. They should copy Windows on what makes sense.
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| Because I use a 55" TV a lot, and it's useful to make
| Preview or whatever just big enough that I can see an
| entire page without being too big to fit in the
| "comfortable reading" part of the screen. (I also like
| the App/Window/Document model of macOS)
| einherjae wrote:
| Why does it make sense that an application must have
| windows to keep running?
| anoncake wrote:
| It's more intuitive for non-technical users, in my
| experience.
| lazide wrote:
| Not doing that results in closing everything you can see
| easily in the GUI but it's still burning RAM and being
| obnoxious where you can't easily see it. If I wanted that
| to happen, I'd tell it to do that.
| wruza wrote:
| Maximizing sites that take 1024 px out of 1920 or even
| 2560 px doesn't really make any sense.
|
| _macOS ' windows not closing when you close them_
|
| Windows' apps closing when you close their windows is no
| less absurd. The same for forcing you to either save or
| discard documents on quit/reboot.
| amyjess wrote:
| I don't want to have any non-maximized windows on my
| screen. I despise overlapping windows, and I want every
| single application I run to be full-screen, just like on
| a phone.
| reaperducer wrote:
| _I want every single application I run to be full-screen,
| just like on a phone._
|
| So run them in full-screen mode. No one is stopping you.
|
| I hardly ever run into a program on macOS that doesn't
| support full-screen. View - Enter Full Screen, or
| Control+Option+F.
| thiht wrote:
| > Windows' apps closing when you close their windows is
| no less absurd
|
| ???
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| With macOS's setup, I can command-tab to any open app
| (e.g. preview), hit the up arrow and then use the arrow
| keys to quickly open a recent document. Without the app
| model macOS uses, this is a lot less convenient, and I
| miss it every time I use my KDE Plasma Desktop.
| anoncake wrote:
| If you use the cascading Application Menu widget, Win --
| Arrow Down -- Arrow Right gets you to the recent files
| menu.
| user-the-name wrote:
| Why, if I want to close one document and open another,
| should it matter which order I do this in?
| tambourine_man wrote:
| The Mac has behaved like that since the classic days. This
| is the platform that invented overlapping windows. They
| aren't supposed to be maximized, as it's almost always a
| waste of screen real estate.
|
| You're just used to other platforms.
| lazide wrote:
| Then why does basically every other application,
| including Apple provided ones, work correctly?
| dreamer7 wrote:
| Best to just install Rectangle app (formerly Spectacle) and
| use sane shortcuts like alt+option+enter for full screen.
| jorvi wrote:
| I use and like Rectangle a lot, but fullscreening an app on
| macOS brings real performance and battery benefits. It's
| not just fancy for being fancy.
| sverhagen wrote:
| How is this, does it put other applications to sleep or
| something?
| jeroenhd wrote:
| > So, if you hold option and double-click a corner, it'll do
| a Windows-style maximize.
|
| I've used Linux command lines with more discoverability than
| that. Good to know if I ever need to use macOS, though,
| that's a nice trick.
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| It depends what you mean by discoverable: option+mouse
| action is a pretty standard macOS convention for alternate
| behavior and "double-click == drag all the way" isn't
| unreasonable. The behavior of option+double-click is
| discoverable by simple composition of these features.
|
| Also, most of this sort of functionality is documented in
| the built-in help system accessible through the help menu.
| mirzmaster wrote:
| Perhaps more intuitively, you can also option+click on
| the green 'maximize' bubble to maximize the window.
| nactivint wrote:
| I used macOS for about seven years before someone told me
| about this behavior. Never would've found it, otherwise.
|
| I guess if I had been using it for twenty years I
| would've known about those old patterns you describe and
| would've thought to randomly try that key combination.
|
| A tooltip at some point would've gone a long way. Pretty
| much an impossible feature to discover unless you're a
| toddler randomly pressing buttons or a greybeard that
| remembers OS 9
| wruza wrote:
| If only there was a website that could provide few
| relevant links to the "macos tips and tricks" query.
| jspash wrote:
| macOS user here since 2006. and i never knew about this
| or even thought to hold a button and click. you learn
| something new every day!
| boraoztunc wrote:
| +1
| diskzero wrote:
| Apple Finder engineer here from 2000 - 2006 and would
| never have guessed about double-clicking or option-
| clicking window edges. This seems more like something I
| would have added to the Nautilus code in 1999.
| fiddlerwoaroof wrote:
| (The option+mouse action is also a natural extension of
| the longstanding macOS convention that control+click ==
| right click.)
| fastball wrote:
| For anyone that hates resizing windows in general on a mac,
| I've found the combination of using a Hyper Key[1] + Moom[2] to
| be amazingly ergonomic.
|
| Here's a quick demo[3] of what this looks like on my machine.
|
| [1] https://brettterpstra.com/2017/06/15/a-hyper-key-with-
| karabi...
|
| [2] https://manytricks.com/moom/
|
| [3] https://my.supernotes.app/share/wire+unaware+noble+meadow
| [deleted]
| forgotpwd16 wrote:
| Make a PR at https://github.com/syxanash/awesome-web-desktops
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Thanks! Will do it!
| mfbx9da4 wrote:
| looks similar to https://macos.vercel.app/
| joshmanders wrote:
| Well yeah, it's gonna look similar. It's a simulation of macOS
| operating system.
| strogonoff wrote:
| Typeface choice is strange, system font stack could make it look
| much more like macOS.
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| You are right, I just picked the font arbitrarily. I'll move to
| more appropriate fonts later, thank you!
| djxfade wrote:
| Only if your browsing from a Mac with the appropriate system
| font
| strogonoff wrote:
| It's not an either-or.
| warpech wrote:
| Amazing work with writing the Terminal component by yourself.
| Very lean and well functional for its purpose.
|
| For those who are interested to see the source:
| https://github.com/Renovamen/playground-macos/blob/main/src/...
| atonse wrote:
| I mean will you ever be unemployed with this set of skills??
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Hi! I'm recently working on a portfolio website simulating macOS
| using React and tailwindcss. The style is between macOS Big Sur
| and Catalina (in another word, I picked out and combined my
| favorite parts from these two versions).
|
| Here's the link to website and Github:
|
| Website: https://portfolio.zxh.io
|
| Github: https://github.com/Renovamen/playground-macos
|
| I appreciate any feedback or suggestions.
| log101 wrote:
| It seems awesome. But dock animation seems to stagger a bit,
| why is that? And can you solve it?
| tyingq wrote:
| I know, Art. And thanks for noticing.
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| You are right, but I'm not good at frontend so I'm sure I can
| solve it hhh. Hope I can find out a solution one day. Thanks!
| iseanstevens wrote:
| You must be absurdly exceptional at whatever it is you ARE
| good at!
| borski wrote:
| I'm going to challenge your assertion of "not being good at
| frontend" based on this submission heh. You should try to
| stop seeing yourself that way.
|
| I _dont't like_ frontend work, but that's different from
| being bad at it. :)
| exikyut wrote:
| FWIW, in Chrome (Dev) on Linux, with hardware decode and 2D
| GPU raster enabled, on a fairly old laptop that occasionally
| sees GPU process hangs, it's _perfectly smooth_, and try as I
| might I can't make it skip frames. The icons jitter around a
| tiny bit as they change size, but I can't get it to produce
| jank.
|
| What browser/hardware?
| unlimit wrote:
| This is crazy impressive. How many hours did it take?
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| See the commit history:
| https://github.com/Renovamen/playground-macos/commits/main
|
| I started it about 10 days ago, but it's hard to calculate
| out the exact number of hours...
| nefitty wrote:
| 10 days!! You might be a real life example of a 10x dev...
| aeoleonn wrote:
| it's beautiful, innovative, and inspiring! well done!
| da39a3ee wrote:
| Wow, this is impressive and quite crazy! Ok so how does the VS
| Code thing work? I browsed the source (in VS Code in your
| website of course) and found the VS code component but I didn't
| quite understand -- it seemed to just be an iframe pointing at
| the README src. And yet it appeared sufficiently like I was
| actually in a VSCode instance to fool me.
| oefrha wrote:
| Yes, it's an iframe embedding a third party service,
| https://github1s.com/. "It appeared sufficiently like I was
| actually in a VSCode instance" because it is a VSCode
| instance.
|
| Source code here: https://github.com/conwnet/github1s
|
| Discussed a while ago:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26083919
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Yeah, github1s is amazing!
| da39a3ee wrote:
| Ohhh right, thanks! I did see that HN discussion so I
| should have spotted the github1s URL. Lots of fun tricks
| going on...
| gtm1260 wrote:
| Awesome! You should see if you can get the dock magnification
| to feel more like the native dock. Would be a research project
| in and of itself, and the current version is still great.
| gabereiser wrote:
| I've been building sites for 20 years, I've recently picked up
| react and seeing the code, it's a great example of react so
| thanks for this! Second, kudos for recreating macos! The design
| is really where macOS shines along with the subtle animations
| and you nailed it. I grew up on System8/9 and miss that
| aesthetic but still cool none the less. Now, support dark mode
| ;)
| shrimpx wrote:
| It supports dark mode.
| monkey_monkey wrote:
| Very nicely done!
| OzzyB wrote:
| At first I was like: Oh, ok, another one of these "here's my
| portfolio that looks like an OS" deals.
|
| Then I was like: Cool, look how he got the nice Dock animation
| down, I bet it took him hours to sort that out.
|
| And then I opened VS Code and I had to write to tell you how my
| mind was blown.
|
| Kudos, senpai.
| smoldesu wrote:
| Like the other commenter said, it's not that impressive
| considering that VS Code was already written in Javascript
| and open-source, so the porting effort required here isn't as
| big as it seems. Still a neat project though!
| texasbigdata wrote:
| Come on way to buzzkill
| stevenhuang wrote:
| It's cool but it's an iframe over
| https://github.com/conwnet/github1s
| FabHK wrote:
| (Without distracting from your eulogy: "she" and "her",
| apparently.)
| [deleted]
| Terretta wrote:
| This is fantastic, and it should help you get hired!
|
| In late 90s, I got a gig in part by demo-ing my own personal MS
| Outlook emulator web front end (backed by ColdFusion POP3/SMTP
| calls). It was entertaining getting a 1996 browser to look and
| behave like Outlook -- had to love frames and multipart server
| push.
|
| Seeing Bear, Terminal, and VSCode here are all both delightful
| and impressive.
|
| Typo feedback:
|
| "In the last sever days, Safari has prevent 95 tracker from
| profiling you" --> "In the last several [seven?] days, Safari
| has prevented 95 trackers from profiling you"
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Thank you for your nice words!
|
| It sounds amazing and quite hard to achieve that in 90s,
| awesome job!
|
| I'll fix the typo later, thanks!
| dceddia wrote:
| Amazingly well done, nice work!
|
| The mind-blown moment for me was when I typed `cat my-` into
| the terminal and hit Tab, and it actually tab-completed the
| filename :D Nice touch.
| htk wrote:
| I spent way too much time on this. And on my phone!
| clustrfunk wrote:
| React is so cool, wish I had the time to mess around with it.
| Cool stuff!
| cube00 wrote:
| Dedicate a small amount of time (even if it's only an hour)
| each week, read a little doco, hack a little code, progress may
| be slow but that's ok because it's still progress. If you wait
| until "you have the time" it'll never happen.
| tdhz77 wrote:
| I think I need to start making a collection of these awesome
| portfolio websites that I've been seeing. If you have a cool
| personal website will you post it here?
| boraoztunc wrote:
| Really inspiring. Also pulling this off in 10 days is quite
| something as well. Bravo!
| [deleted]
| input_sh wrote:
| Looks great! The only real complaint I have is that I can't tell
| which links will open in a new tab vs which ones will work within
| a tab.
|
| Oh and I found a typo in Safari:
|
| > In the last _sever_ days, Safari has prevent 66 tracker from
| profiling you.
|
| I'm assuming that should be seven.
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Nice catch! Will fix it later, thank you!
| josephg wrote:
| Very cool! Small tweak - MacOS adds a tiny 1px border around each
| window, so if two windows partially overlap they don't blend
| together into UI soup.
|
| I'd never consciously noticed that aspect of macos before, but
| this small detail instantly threw the window border into uncanny
| territory for me. I had to zoom in on both sites to spot what was
| going on!
| oh-renovamen wrote:
| Oh, nice catch! I have used macos for about 5 years but I'd
| never noticed that either. I'll add a border later, thank you!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-05-08 23:00 UTC) |