Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:24:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from c-24-1-225-166.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([24.1.225.166] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E3zkS-0001Mo-6U for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:24:45 -0500 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8CD3640; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:24:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:24:28 -0500 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: basic newb info Message-ID: <20050813162428.GB9956@pongonova.net> References: <afb85cb40507111446382e89e9@mail.gmail.com> <42FCEC9D.5040201@route-add.net> <20050813044356.GH8640@pongonova.net> <20050813151309.GB16199@katherina.lan.complete.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050813151309.GB16199@katherina.lan.complete.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.0): AWL=-0.008, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, NO_REAL_NAME=0.178, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:24:45 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1070 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:13:09AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > Well, what exactly do you want to see? IMHO, one of the best ways to > see what can be done is to look at what is done out there. I'd like to see some side-by-side comparisons of Gopher pages and the "source" used to generate it. Sort of like some PHP sites, where you can click a link and view the actual PHP. A wiki sounds interesting...actually, that sounds like an interesting project: Modify a wiki which will parse a gopher page. That way, editing the page will display the actual source. Hmm...if anyone's interested, I might just try to tackle that later in the fall after school is underway. pmwiki sounds like a good candidate, it's in Perl and I believe there's a Perl gopher module (plus, the creator of pmwiki, Patrick Michaud, is local to me and might be persuaded to provide some pointers!). --Brian