REACHING  THE  TARGET  AUDIENCE 


A  thesis  presented  to  the  Faculty  of  the  U.S.  Army 
Command  and  General  Staff  College  in  partial 
fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the 
degree 

MASTER  OF  MILITARY  ART  AND  SCIENCE 
General  Studies 


by 

MARK  S.  FLITTON,  MAJOR,  USAR 
BFA,  University  of  Washington,  Seattle,  Washington,  1987 


Fort  Leavenworth,  Kansas 
2014-01 


Approved  for  public  release;  distribution  is  unlimited. 


REPORT  DOCUMENTATION  PAGE 


Form  Approved 
OMB  No.  0704-0188 


Public  reporting  burden  for  this  collection  of  information  is  estimated  to  average  1  hour  per  response,  including  the  time  for  reviewing  instructions,  searching  existing  data 
sources,  gathering  and  maintaining  the  data  needed,  and  completing  and  reviewing  this  collection  of  information.  Send  comments  regarding  this  burden  estimate  or  any  other 
aspect  of  this  collection  of  information,  including  suggestions  for  reducing  this  burden  to  Department  of  Defense,  Washington  Headquarters  Services,  Directorate  for 
Information  Operations  and  Reports  (0704-0188),  1 21 5  Jefferson  Davis  Highway,  Suite  1204,  Arlington,  VA  22202-4302.  Respondents  should  be  aware  that  notwithstanding 
any  other  provision  of  law,  no  person  shall  be  subject  to  any  penalty  for  failing  to  comply  with  a  collection  of  information  if  it  does  not  display  a  currently  valid  OMB  control 
number.  PLEASE  DO  NOT  RETURN  YOUR  FORM  TO  THE  ABOVE  ADDRESS. 


1.  REPORT  DATE  (DD-MM-YYYY)  2.  REPORT  TYPE  3.  DATES  COVERED  (From  -  To) 

13-06-2014  Master’s  Thesis  AUG  2013  -  JUN  2014 


4.  TITLE  AND  SUBTITLE  5a.  CONTRACT  NUMBER 


Reaching  The  Target  Audience 


5b.  GRANT  NUMBER 


5c.  PROGRAM  ELEMENT  NUMBER 


6.  AUTHOR(S) 

MAJ  Mark  S.  Flitton 


5d.  PROJECT  NUMBER 


5e.  TASK  NUMBER 


7.  PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION  NAME(S)  AND  ADDRESS(ES) 

U.S.  Army  Command  and  General  Staff  College 

ATTN:  ATZL-SWD-GD 

Fort  Leavenworth,  KS  66027-2301 


9.  SPONSORING  /  MONITORING  AGENCY  NAME(S)  AND  ADDRESS(ES) 


5f.  WORK  UNIT  NUMBER 


8.  PERFORMING  ORG  REPORT 
NUMBER 


10.  SPONSOR/MONITOR’S 
ACRONYM(S) 


11.  SPONSOR/MONITOR’S  REPORT 
NUMBER(S) 


12.  DISTRIBUTION  /  AVAILABILITY  STATEMENT 

Approved  for  Public  Release;  Distribution  is  Unlimited 


13.  SUPPLEMENTARY  NOTES 


14.  ABSTRACT 

Military  Information  Support  Operations  (MISO)  uses  themes  and  messages  to  reach  target 
audiences  in  order  to  influence  their  emotions,  motives,  reasoning,  and  ultimately  the  behavior 
of  foreign  governments,  organizations,  groups,  and  individuals. 

This  thesis  looks  at  the  German  people  as  the  target  audience  of  the  National  Socialist  German 
Workers  Party  (NSDAP  or  NS)  from  1920  to  1941  to  determine  if  the  methods  and  techniques 
were  effective  in  influencing  the  German  people  to  believe  or  conform  to  NS  ideology.  The 
level  of  effectiveness  is  the  number  of  German  citizens  who  supported  NS  ideology  or 
remained  unopposed  to  their  actions.  The  analysis  will  be  conducted  through  the  MISO  Target 
Audience  Analysis  process  to  frame  the  research  as  well  as  conclude  calculable  strengths  and 
weaknesses  of  MISO  synchronize  information  related  capabilities,  methods  and  techniques. 


15.  SUBJECT  TERMS 

Military  Information  Support  Operations 


16.  SECURITY  CLASSIFICATION  OF: 


a.  REPORT  b.  ABSTRACT  c.  THIS  PAGE 


17.  LIMITATION 

18.  NUMBER 

OF  ABSTRACT 

OF  PAGES 

(U) 

82 

19b.  PHONE  NUMBER  (include  area  code) 


MASTER  OF  MILITARY  ART  AND  SCIENCE 


THESIS  APPROVAL  PAGE 


Name  of  Candidate:  Major  Mark  S.  Flitton 
Thesis  Title:  Reaching  the  Target  Audience 


Approved  by: 


Jesse  Mclnyre  III,  M.A. 


Thesis  Committee  Chair 


LTC  Richard  Davenport,  M.A. 


,  Member 


Ethan  Rafuse,  Ph.D. 


,  Member 


Accepted  this  13th  day  of  June  2014  by: 


Robert  Baumann,  Ph.D. 


,  Director,  Graduate  Degree  Programs 


The  opinions  and  conclusions  expressed  herein  are  those  of  the  student  author  and  do  not 
necessarily  represent  the  views  of  the  U.S.  Army  Command  and  General  Staff  College  or 
any  other  governmental  agency.  (References  to  this  study  should  include  the  foregoing 
statement.) 


ABSTRACT 


REACHING  THE  TARGET  AUDIENCE,  by  MAJOR  Mark  Flitton,  USAR,  82  pages. 

Military  Information  Support  Operations  (MISO),  previously  known  as  Psychological 
Operations  (PSYOP),  uses  themes  and  messages  to  reach  target  audiences  in  order  to 
influence  their  emotions,  motives,  reasoning,  and  ultimately  the  behavior  of  foreign 
governments,  organizations,  groups,  and  individuals. 

This  thesis  looks  at  the  German  people  as  the  target  audience  of  the  National  Socialist 
German  Workers  Party  (NSDAP  or  NS)  from  1920  to  1941  to  determine  if  the  methods 
and  techniques  were  effective  in  influencing  the  German  people  to  believe  or  conform  to 
NS  ideology.  The  level  of  effectiveness  is  the  number  of  German  citizens  who  supported 
NS  ideology  or  remained  unopposed  to  their  actions.  The  analysis  will  be  conducted 
through  the  MISO  Target  Audience  Analysis  process  to  frame  the  research  as  well  as 
conclude  calculable  strengths  and  weaknesses  of  MISO  synchronize  information  related 
capabilities,  methods  and  techniques. 

MISO  does  not  support  NS  ideology  or  any  past  or  current  practice  of  the  ideology.  The 
analysis  is  strictly  designed  to  look  at  the  execution  of  NS  propaganda  and  what 
persuasive  influence  it  had  over  the  German  people.  US  national  policy  does  not  support 
MISO  conducting  any  action  beyond  the  established  policies  and  procedures  set  by  law 
for  MISO.  NS  ideology  was  not  only  about  persuasion  through  media.  It  was  supported 
by  the  Ghestapo  and  Schutzstaffeln  (SS)  agents  through  false  imprisonment,  rape, 
murder,  and  slaughter  of  innocent  people  who  were  against  or  did  not  conform  to  NS 
ideology. 

Just  as  important  to  understanding  NS  propaganda  is  the  importance  of  conducting  a 
thorough  Target  Audience  Analysis  (TAA).  The  process  of  understanding  a  target 
audience  is  critical  to  determining  if  your  Target  Audience  is  susceptible  and  capable  of 
being  influenced.  If  a  MISO  operator  does  not  understand  the  depth  of  an  individual’s 
condition,  concerns,  fears,  ambitions,  and  vulnerabilities,  then  MISO  will  not  be 
effective. 

It  is  hoped  that  this  document  will  assist  in  a  more  analytical  formulation  of  Target 
Audience  Analysis  concepts,  plans,  programs,  themes,  and  messages  that  can  be 
synchronized  effectivelky  with  national  policy  and  commander’s  mission.  MISO  can 
have  an  incredible  impact  on  a  populace  if  it  is  planned,  synchronized,  and  conducted 
properly. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


This  author  wishes  to  express  his  sincere  appreciation  to  the  many  enlisted 
Soldiers  and  officers  I  have  had  the  privilege  to  work  with  throughout  my  career.  All 
have  chosen  this  profession  which  has  not  been  easy  and  yet  they  persevere  and  serve  this 
great  nation  with  pride. 

I  also  want  to  thank  the  commander’s  that  I  have  had  the  great  privilege  to  work 
for.  LTC  Larry  Dietz,  who  I  would  not  have  been  an  officer  today  without  his  guidance 
during  a  Brigade  Combat  Training  Program  (BCTP)  exercise  at  Fort  Lewis,  Washington. 
COL  Barry  Larrain  and  COL  Miguel  Castellanos  both  gave  me  a  chance  to  prove  myself 
as  a  leader  and  staff  officer,  and  provided  outstanding  leadership  and  management 
guidance.  COL  Wayne  Tasler  who  trusted  and  believed  in  me  to  take  charge  and  fix  the 
various  units  I  had  the  privilege  to  command  and  expanded  my  knowledge  in  becoming  a 
better  person  and  an  officer. 

I  am  also  grateful  to  the  members  of  my  thesis  committee  and  my  Small  Group 
Advisors,  LTC  Steven  Smith  and  Doctor  William  “Coach”  Kuchinski.  I  am  also  thankful 
to  the  Fort  Leavenworth’s  Combined  Anns  Research  Library,  who  went  out  of  their  way 
to  provide  most  of  my  research  materials. 

Finally,  I  would  like  to  thank  my  family  for  supporting  me  over  these  many  years 
as  I  have  not  been  home  enough  to  watch  them  grow.  I  am  eternally  grateful. 


v 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 


Page 

MASTER  OF  MILITARY  ART  AND  SCIENCE  THESIS  APPROVAL  PAGE . iii 

ABSTRACT . iv 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . v 

TABLE  OF  CONTENTS . vi 

ACRONYMS . vii 

CHAPTER  1  INTRODUCTION . 1 

CHAPTER  2  LITERATURE  REVIEW . 7 

CHAPTER  3  RESEARCH  METHODOLOGY . 14 

CHAPTER  4  ANALYSIS . 17 

Condition . 21 

Vulnerability . 23 

Line  of  Persuasion  (LOP) . 24 

Symbols . 26 

Accessibility . 32 

Effectiveness . 42 

CHAPTER  5  CONCLUSIONS  AND  RECOMMENDATIONS . 46 

Conclusions . 46 

Recommendations . 49 

ILLUSTRATIONS . 52 

GLOSSARY . 71 

BIBLIOGRAPHY . 72 


vi 


ACRONYMS 


ARSOF 

CARL 

CED 

CEM 

CF 

DAF 

DNVP 

IRC 

LOP 

MARCO 

MILDEC 

MIS 

MISO 

MOE 

NS 

NS  DAP 

OE 

PMESII-PT 

PO 

PSYOP 


Army  Special  Operation  Forces 
Combined  Arms  Research  Library 
Captured  Enemy  Documents 
Captured  Enemy  Material 
Conventional  Forces 

Deutsche  Arbeitsfront  (German  Labour  Front) 

Deutschnationale  Volkspartei  (German  National 
formation  of  the  NS 

Information  Related  Capability 

Line  of  Persuasion 

Message,  Audience,  Reaction,  Carrier,  Origin 

Military  Deception 

Military  Information  Support 

Military  Information  Support  Operations 

Measures  of  Effectiveness 

National  Socialist 

Nationalsozialistische  Deutsche  Arbeiterpartie  (National  Socialist  German 
Workers  Party) 

Operational  Environment 

People’s  Party) 

Political,  Military,  Economic,  Social,  Information,  Infrastructure,  Physical 
environment,  and  Time 

Psychological  Operations  Objectives 

Psychological  Operations 


PTA  Potential  Target  Audience 

RMVP  Reichsministerium  fur  Volks aufklarung  und  Propaganda  (Reich  Ministry 

of  Popular  Enlightenment  and  Propaganda) 

SA  Sturm  Abteilungen  (Storm  Troopers),  paramilitary 

SD  Sicherheitsdienst  der  SS  (Secret  Police  Reports) 

SIRC  Synchronize  information  related  capabilities 

SLE  Soldier  and  Leader  Engagement 

SO  Special  Operations 

SOF  Special  Operations  Forces 

SPO  Supporting  Psychological  Operations  Objectives 

SS  Schutzstaffeln,  Nazi  elite  paramilitary  formation, 

TA  Target  Audience 

TAA  Target  Audience  Analysis 

TAAP  Target  Audience  Analysis  Process 

U.S.  United  States 

USACAPOC  United  States  Civil  Affairs  and  Psychological  Operations  Command 
(Airborne) 

USAJFKSWCS  United  States  Army  John  F.  Kennedy  Special  Warfare  Center  and  School 
USG  United  States  government 


viii 


CHAPTER  1 


INTRODUCTION 

The  concept  of  influencing,  known  as  propaganda,  has  been  around  since  the 
beginning  of  time.  The  definition  of  propaganda  has  only  been  around  for  the  last  four 
hundred  years.  It  first  appeared  in  1623  describing  a  congregation  for  propagating  the 
faith.  The  Catholic  church  used  the  term  in  1718  to  describe  a  school  for  priests  (College 
of  Propaganda)  gathered  to  educate  for  foreign  missions.  In  the  19th  to  early  20th 
century,  propaganda  was  widely  accepted  as  a  neutral  term  meaning  the  dissemination  of 
information  in  favor  of  any  given  cause.  It  wasn’t  until  after  World  War  II  that  the  term 
took  on  the  meaning  of  deception  or  manipulation  of  human  emotions  through  words  and 
messages  using  sorted  facts  or  half  truths.1 

The  “Merriam-Webster’s  Dictionary”  defines  it  as  ideas  or  statements  that  are 
often  false  or  exaggerated  and  that  are  spread  in  order  to  help  a  cause,  a  political  leader, 
or  government.2  This  definition  is  a  modem  version  of  the  word  expressing  the 
disinformation  approach  to  propaganda. 

The  “Business  Dictionary”  defines  propaganda  as  a  message  designed  to  persuade 
its  intended  audience  to  think  and  behave  in  a  certain  manner.3  Under  this  definition, 
advertising  and  political  activism  can  be  considered  propaganda. 

'David  Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda  (New  York,  NY: 
Routledge,  2007),  5. 

2Merriam- Webster’s  Dictionary,  “propaganda,”  http://www.merriam- 
webster.com/dictionary/propaganda  (accessed  18  March  2014). 

’Business  Dictionary,  “propaganda,”  http://www.businessdictionary.com/ 
definition/propaganda.html  (accessed  10  March  2014). 

1 


U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  Tactical  Psychological 
Operations  Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures ,  defines  propaganda  as  any  form  of 
communication  designed  to  influence  the  opinions,  emotions,  attitudes,  or  behavior  of 
any  group  in  order  to  benefit  the  sponsor,  either  directly  or  indirectly.4  Military 
Information  Support  Operations  (MISO)  use  the  term  to  indicate  information  and 
influence  activities,  conducted  by  enemy  or  hostile  forces,  elements,  or  groups  against 
U.S.  or  coalition  forces. 

MISO,  formally  known  as  Psychological  Operations  (PSYOP),  is  an  instrument  of 
national  power  that  uses  synchronized  information  related  capabilities  (SIRC)  to  conduct 
inform  and  influence  operations.  It  conducts  activities  once  recognized  as  propaganda  (by 
definition  in  the  early  20th  century)  but  due  to  social  and  political  changes,  the  term 
propaganda  is  not  associated  with  MISO. 

Bradley  C.  Hosmer,  President  of  the  National  Defense  University,  stated  that  "the 
negative  connotations  in  the  West  of  the  word  propaganda  suggest  we  have  treated 
political  war  as  incompatible  with  democratic  values  and  traditions."5  Frank  R.  Barnett 
expressed  that  "some  would  argue  that  the  ethics  of  democracy  preclude  too  strenuous  a 
concern  with  propaganda."6  These  statements  explain  why  the  terms  propaganda  and 
MISO  are  interrelated  but  the  United  States  government  has  established  a  distinction 

4U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  Tactical  Psychological 
Operations  Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures  (Washington,  DC:  Office  of  the  Chief 
of  Staff  of  the  Army,  2005),  D-l. 

5Carnes  Lord  and  Frank  R.  Barnett,  Political  Warfare  and  Psychological 
Operations:  Rethinking  the  U.S  .  Approach  (Washington,  DC:  National  Defense 
University  Press,  1988),  vii. 

6Ibid„  152. 


2 


between  them.  They  function  in  much  the  same  way  but  the  connotation  and  association 
to  who  is  conducting  the  influencing  is  different. 

Another  difference  between  propaganda  and  military  information  support  is 
propaganda  is  designed  to  influence  internal  (country)  and  external  (foreign)  audiences 
while  MISO  only  targets  external  audiences.  Again,  the  two  activities  are  similar.  They 
both  use  methods  (tools)  and  techniques  (themes,  messages,  lines  of  persuasion)  to  reach 
their  audience  but  the  receiver  of  MISO  influence  activities  is  not  and  cannot  be  a  U.S. 
citizen.  MISO  conducts  information  operations  in  the  United  States  when  requested  by 
FEMA  to  support  natural  disasters  but  it  does  not  conduct  influence  operations. 

For  this  thesis,  propaganda  will  be  defined  as  activies  conducted  by  the  NS  and 
influence  activities  conducted  by  MISO.  The  methods  and  techniques  are  considered  the 
same.  The  difference  is  the  undercurrent  of  the  NS  message  that  was  presented  to  their 
audience  supported  by  physical  action  against  non-conformers  to  NS  ideology. 

MISO  does  not  support  NS  ideology  or  any  past  or  current  practice  of  the 
ideology.  The  thesis  is  strictly  looking  at  the  execution  of  NS  propaganda  and  what 
persuasive  influence  it  had  over  the  German  people.  US  national  policy  does  not  support 
MISO  conducting  any  action  beyond  the  established  policies  and  procedures  set  by  law 
for  MISO  operators.  NS  ideology  was  not  only  about  persuasion  through  media,  it  was 
supported  by  Ghestapo  and  Schutzstaffeln  (SS)  agents  who  carried  out  acts  of  false 
imprisonment,  rape,  murder,  and  the  slaughter  of  innocent  people  who  were  against  or 
did  not  conform  to  NS  ideology. 

National  Socialist  German  Workers  Party  (NSDAP),  better  known  as  the  National 
Socialist  (NS)  or  Nazi  Party,  came  into  power  on  March  21,  1933  with  Adolf  Hitler  as  the 


3 


Chancellor  of  Germany  under  Reich  President  Paul  von  Hindenburg.  In  a  few  short  years, 
the  NS  used  propaganda  to  help  transform  Germany  from  a  economically  weak  and 
militarily  defeated  country  into  a  nation  proud  of  their  rich  history,  strong  economy  and  a 
powerful  military.  All  this  was  done  at  a  time  when  the  rest  of  the  world  was  mired  in  the 
Great  Depression.  As  dominating  as  NS  propaganda  was  in  the  lives  of  the  German 
people,  it  is  important  to  analyze  the  methods  and  techniques  without  prejudice. 

The  primary  goal  of  NS  propaganda  was  to  radically  restructure  German  society 
so  that  social  class,  religion,  and  loyalties  would  be  replaced  by  a  heightened  national 
awareness.7  The  aim  was  to  bring  about  Volks gemeinschaft,  a  national  or  peoples 
community.8  The  Volksgemeinschaft  required  that  all  its  members  be  centered  on  the 
same  goal;  dedicated  to  hard  work  and  to  put  “the  community  before  the  individual” 

(■ Gemeinnutz  vor  Eigennutz).9 

There  is  evidence  that  NS  propaganda  reflected  the  aspirations  of  large  sections  of 
the  population.10  Thus,  NS  propaganda  was  as  much  about  confirming  as  about 
converting  public  opinion.11  MISO  operators  need  to  understand  the  foundation  of  a 
culture  and  ideology  before  they  can  begin  to  support  or  counter  opinions  and  attitudes.  It 
is  also  critical  to  understand  that  deep  rooted  ideologies  in  a  society  require  very  specific 
and  detailed  analysis  to  be  effective  in  response. 

7Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  5. 

8Ibid„  60. 

9Ibid„  61. 

10Ibid„  9. 

uIbid. 


4 


Adolf  Hitler  wrote,  “The  purpose  of  propaganda  is  not  to  provide  interesting 
distraction  for  blase  young  gentlemen,  but  to  convince,  and  what  I  mean  is  to  convince 
the  masses.  But  the  masses  are  slow  moving,  and  they  always  require  a  certain  time 
before  they  are  ready  even  to  notice  a  thing,  and  only  after  the  simplest  ideas  are  repeated 
thousands  of  times  will  the  masses  finally  remember  them.”12  He  also  wrote,  “When 
there  is  a  change,  it  must  not  alter  the  content  of  what  the  propaganda  is  driving  at,  but  in 
the  end  must  always  say  the  same  thing.  For  instance,  a  slogan  must  be  presented  from 
different  angles,  but  the  end  of  all  remarks  must  always  and  immutably  be  the  slogan 
itself.  Only  in  this  way  can  the  propaganda  have  a  unified  and  complete  effect.”13  These 
thoughts  are  why  MISO  operators  must  understand  propaganda.  Propaganda  and  MISO 
are  influence  tools  designed  to  persuade  and  influence  a  person’s  perspective. 
Understanding  propaganda  will  help  MISO  operators  conduct  informed  synchronized 
information  related  capabilities  more  effectively. 

New  technology,  such  as  radio  and  film  with  sound,  was  used  extensively  by  the 
NS.  Radio  and  film  provided  a  powerful  platform  to  disseminate  propaganda  messages. 
The  effect  of  propaganda  through  the  use  of  technology  and  its  ability  to  create  or 
develop  emotional  thoughts  is  required  to  be  understood  by  the  MISO  operator. 

This  thesis  does  not  support  the  use  of  NS  propaganda  but  the  process  and  its 
capabilities  are  important  to  understand.  MISO  must  look  to  the  past  to  develop  more 
informed  and  effective  MISO  methods  and  techniques.  The  media  of  today  is  far  more 
extensive  in  reaching  a  broader  audience  than  the  media  of  the  1930s.  Information  can 

12 Adolf  Hitler,  Mein  Kampf  trans.  Ralph  Manheim,  vol.  1  A  Reckoning,  “War 
Propaganda”  (Geneva,  IL:  Houghton  Mifflin  Harcourt,  1998),  51. 

13Ibid„  52. 


5 


travel  around  the  world  faster  through  the  internet  making  propaganda  more  dangerous  in 
the  hands  of  an  adversary.  Adolf  Hitler  wrote  “propaganda  is  no  more  than  a  weapon, 
though  a  frightful  one  in  the  hand  of  an  expert.”14  This  is  why  MISO  operators  must  look 
at  how  propaganda  is  used  and  countered  proportionally.  It  is  hoped  that  a  deeper 
understanding  of  past  propaganda  methods  may  make  MISO  operators  respond  more 
effectively  in  today’s  MISO  activites. 


14Ibid.,  18. 


6 


CHAPTER  2 


LITERATURE  REVIEW 

There  are  over  433,000  references  to  psychological  operations  and  Military 
Information  Support  Operations  and  over  83,000  references  to  NSDAP,  NS,  or  Nazi 
propaganda  in  the  Combined  Arms  Research  Library  (CARL).  Of  these  references,  a 
focus  on  keystone  documents  was  maintained  in  order  to  keep  the  information  consistent 
and  maintain  research  defendable  among  a  community  of  experts.  Most  of  the  material, 
except  for  the  field  manuals,  is  used  by  a  community  of  experts  as  major  sources  of 
information.  Their  conclusions  may  differ  slightly  due  to  their  research,  but  they  are 
generally  in  agreement  as  to  facts,  conditions,  purpose,  and  execution. 

Field  Manual  (EM)  3-53,  Military  Information  Support  Operations ,  is  the  newest 
keystone  doctrine  manual  for  United  States  (U.S.)  Army  Military  Information  Support 
Operations  (MISO).  It  is  the  authoritative  reference  for  the  U.S.  Army  in  influencing 
foreign  target  audiences  across  the  range  of  military  operations. 

The  mission  of  MISO  is  explained  in  Chapter  One,  “Mission  and  Core  Tasks”.  It 
is  important  to  understand  what  MISO  is  so  that  the  best  methods  and  techniques  can  be 
used.  Combatant  Commanders  are  increasingly  recognizing  the  physical  and 
psychological  effects  military  activities  have  on  populations.  They  expect  MISO 
operators  to  be  professionals  in  their  field  and  who  know  how  to  reach  their  target 
audiences  effectively.  That  is  why  it  is  important  to  understand  the  process  of  MISO  and 
use  related  influence  techniques  from  history  to  determine  what  past  success  that  were 
used  to  support  a  given  situation.  In  the  words  of  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  Tactical 


7 


Psychological  Operations  Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures,  the  definition  of  MISO 


U.S.  Army  MISO  forces  are  trained,  educated,  equipped,  organized,  mission- 
tailored,  and  purpose-designed  to  influence  foreign  individuals  and  groups,  and 
inform  both  domestic  and  foreign  populations.  As  such,  they  provide  the  DOD  a 
robust  capability  to  both  inform  and  influence  foreign  audiences  in  permissive, 
uncertain,  and  hostile  environments.  MISO  contribute  to  the  accomplishment  of 
the  full  range  of  conventional  and  SO  missions  by  influencing,  informing,  and 
directing  foreign  audiences  and  populations  in  a  manner  consistent  with  U.S. 
national  objectives.15 

The  gap  in  this  FM  is  the  lack  of  information  that  had  been  in  previous  FMs  to 
describe  the  MISO  process.  For  example,  FM  3-53  does  not  cover  in  depth  the  MISO 
core  tasks,  operations,  targeting,  MISO  Military  Decision  Making  Process,  aerial 
delivery,  or  Target  Audience  Analysis.  New  or  revised  doctrine  has  not  been  released  at 
the  time  of  this  writing  to  support  the  gap  of  information.  FM  3-05.301,  Psychological 
Operations  Process,  Tactics,  Techniques  and  Procedures  and  FM  3-05.302,  Tactical 
Psychological  Operations  Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures,  are  still  in  effect  as  a 
main  source  of  MISO  information.  FM  3-05.302,  Tactical  Psychological  Operations 
Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures,  Chapter  6,  describes  the  Seven  Phase  MISO 
(PSYOP)  process,  which  will  be  used  here  to  analyze  NS  propaganda  methods  and 
techniques. 

The  second  phase  in  the  Seven  Phase  MISO  (PSYOP)  process  is  the  Target 
Audience  Analysis  (TAA).  TAA  is  a  detailed,  systematic  examination  of  PSYOP- 
relevant  information  to  select  Target  Audiences  (TAs)  that  can  accomplish  a  given 


15U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-53,  Military  Information  Support 
Operations  (Washington,  DC:  Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff  of  the  Army,  January  2013),  1- 
1. 


Supporting  Psychological  Operations  Objectives  (SPO).16  The  Target  Audience  Analysis 
Process  (TAAP)  is  the  method  to  analyze  a  target  audience  in  order  to  select  relevant 
information,  messages,  techniques  that  will  shape  or  create  an  effect  with  the  target 
audience. 

The  TAAP  is  designed  to  answer  four  questions.  What  target  audiences  will  be 
most  effective  in  accomplishing  the  desired  behavioral  or  attitudinal  response?17  What 
Lines  of  Persuasion  (LOP)  will  influence  the  target  audience  to  achieve  the  objective?18 
What  media  will  effectively  carry  the  chosen  LOP?19  What  events  or  measures  of 
effectiveness  will  indicate  success  or  failure  of  the  PSYOP  effort?20  Understanding  the 
TAAP  is  critical  to  MISO  success.  If  the  analysis  of  the  target  audience  is  flawed,  then 
the  message  is  flawed.  If  we  cannot  understand  how  to  analyze  a  target  audience  then 
MISO  cannot  answer  the  questions  properly.  This  will  result  in  TAA  being  poorly 
executed  or  ineffective.  This  phase  will  be  the  method  of  comparison  for  this  thesis  of  the 
NS  target  audience  and  propaganda  methods  and  techniques.  It  is  the  research  and 
analysis  method  for  developing  MISO  programs,  supporting  programs,  and  their 
respective  series. 


16U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  Tactical  Psychological 
Operations  Tactics,  Techniques,  and  Procedures  (Washington,  DC:  Office  of  the  Chief 
of  Staff  of  the  Army,  2005),  6-2. 

17Ibid„  6-4. 

18Ibid. 

19Ibid. 

20Ibid. 


9 


There  are  ten  steps  to  the  TAAP  but  eight  are  relevant  to  this  thesis  examination. 


Two  are  administrative  processes.  The  ten  steps  evaluate  the  conditions  that  affect  the 
target  audience,  determine  the  target  audience’s  vulnerabilities,  select  LOPs,  identify 
symbols,  determine  susceptible  rating,  determine  accessibility,  determine  the  target 
audience’s  effectiveness  and  determine  the  impact  indicators.21 

Another  keystone  document  is  the  writings  of  William  Shirer  in  the  Rise  and  Fall 
of  the  Third  Reich.  It  is  a  single  book  composed  of  6  chapters  (called  books)  for  which 
Book  One:  The  Rise  of  Adolf  Hitler,  Book  Two:  Triumph  and  Consolidation ,  Book 
Three:  The  Road  to  War,  and  Book  Four:  War:  Early  Victories  and  the  Turning  Point, 
were  used.  It  was  first  published  in  1960  and  won  the  1961  National  Book  Award  for 
Nonfiction.22  It  is  a  historical  interpretation  of  the  events  in  German  history  up  through 
the  fall  of  Nazi  Germany.  MISO  doctrine  is  not  Shirer’s  focus.  What  he  does  provide  is 
an  excellent  source  of  information  pertaining  to  Adolf  Hitler,  Joseph  Goebbels,  the 
German  people,  and  the  rise  of  the  NS  party.  Mr.  Shirer  was  a  journalist  who  lived  in 
Germany  and  saw  first  hand  the  development  of  Nazi  Germany  up  to  1940.  Mr.  Shirer’s 
work  is  relevant  to  this  research  as  his  work  has  been  recognized  as  accurate  and  cited  by 
many  scholars.  The  comparison  of  MISO  doctrine  to  the  NS  will  be  the  qualitative 
analysis  based  on  TAAP.  The  gap  is  the  lack  of  any  literature  on  the  MISO  study  of 
methods  and  techniques  in  relation  to  NS  propaganda. 


21Ibid„  6-5. 

"William  L.  Shirer,  The  Rise  and  Fall  of  the  Third  Reich  (New  York,  NY:  Simon 
and  Schuster,  1992),  1484. 


10 


The  three  major  publications  that  will  be  referenced  the  most  throughout  this 
thesis  are  by  three  renowned  students  of  NS  propaganda.  Lancaster  University  Professor 
Aristotle  A.  Kallis  wrote  Nazi  Propaganda  and  the  Second  World  War.  University  of 
Kent  Professor  David  Welch  wrote  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda.  Calvin 
College  Professor  Randall  Bytwerk  wrote  Bending  Spines,  along  with  his  collection  of 
articles,  artifacts,  documents,  posters,  movies,  and  book  collection  on  German 
propaganda  posted  on  the  Calvin  College  website.23 

These  three  authors  provided  a  wealth  of  knowledge  to  understanding  NS 
propaganda.  They  used  German  government  documents,  writings  directed  contributed  to 
Hitler,  Goebbels  and  other  leaders  of  the  Third  Reich,  and  scholarly  works  recognized  as 
accurate  and  informative  from  countries  around  the  world.  Their  depth  of  understanding 
the  development  and  growth  of  the  NS  party  with  the  leadership  of  Adolf  Hitler  and 
Joseph  Goebbels,  Hitler’s  propaganda  minister,  helped  formulate  understanding  of  how 
the  growth  of  a  weak  political  party  grew  into  a  national,  if  not  a  world  phenomenon.  In 
addition,  these  authors  often  referenced  each  other.  The  relationship  to  MISO  is  that  these 
books  provide  depth  of  information  towards  the  NS’s  use  of  print,  radio,  film,  the  arts, 
parades,  rallies,  speeches  and  symbolism  to  portray  strength  and  their  vision  for  a  new 
German  society.  They  provide  excellent  insights  to  analyze  and  draw  conclusions  through 
the  TAAP  in  order  to  determine  relevance  of  NS  propaganda  to  conducting  better  MISO 
campaigns. 


23Calvin  College,  German  Propaganda  Archive:  Speeches,  posters,  art  work, 
digital  books  and  articles,  http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ww2era.htm 
(accessed  18  March  2014). 


11 


Professor  Bytwerk’s  edited  book,  Landmark  Speeches  of  National  Socialism,  and 
Adolf  Hitler’s  Mein  Kampf  (My  Struggle)  provide  additional  insights.  They  provide 
information  on  the  thoughts,  beliefs  and  ideas  of  the  leaders  of  the  NS.  These  two  books 
tie  in  well  with  the  three  professors’  works  as  they  also  reference  this  material  throughout 
their  research. 

Another  set  of  books  to  support  the  relationship  between  internal  and  external 
validity,  which  will  be  discussed  in  the  next  chapter,  is  the  books  on  the  life  and  times  of 
German  citizens  living  in  the  Third  Reich.  Richard  Bessel’s  book  Life  in  the  Third  Reich 
and  Frederic  Tubach  and  Sally  Peterson’s  book  German  Voices:  Memories  of  Life  During 
Hitler ’s  Third  Reich  provide  insights  into  the  daily  lives  of  German  before  and  during  the 
war.  These  works  provide  personal  insights  on  the  influence  of  the  NS  on  their  lives. 

These  books  do  not  directly  relate  the  NS  party  to  MISO  but  they  do  offer  how 
NS  propaganda  was  used  and  how  it  influenced  the  German  populace.  Each  individual 
account  did  mention  that  throughout  the  pre-war  and  war  years  NS  propaganda  was  a  part 
of  their  daily  lives.  It  was  a  question  of  what  they  believed  and  how  much  they  believed 
the  propaganda  presented.  Some  were  avid  supporters,  believing  that  Hitler  truly  cared 
for  and  represented  the  common  German  ideology  and  beliefs..  It  was  not  until  1941, 
when  the  German  military  began  to  loose  the  war  in  Russia  that  many  of  the  German 
people  began  to  recognize  that  Hitler  and  the  NS  propaganda  machine  were  not  truthful. 
Support  for  Hitler  and  the  NS  began  to  decline. 

Of  the  books,  manuals,  and  internet  websites  used  for  this  thesis,  all  documents 
and  information  conclude  NS  propaganda  was  the  first  twentieth  century  agency  to  use 
every  means  of  communication  available  to  build  the  masses  of  Germany  into  a  frenzy  of 


12 


support  for  the  new  Germany  and  Adolf  Hitler.  This  frenzy,  exploiting  hatred  for 
communism,  the  Jew,  and  Weimar  government  through  Volksgemeinschaft  and  military 
success,  will  provide  a  good  understanding  of  how  propaganda  was  used. 

This  analysis  will  provide  the  gap  in  discussing  the  relationship  of  propaganda 
and  synchronized  information  related  capabilities  (SIRC)  through  NS  propaganda  and 
MISO  operations.  The  many  sources  clearly  provide  a  framework  to  study  the 
effectiveness  of  NS  propaganda  and  for  MISO  operators  to  analyze  what  methods  and 
techniques  need  to  be  evaluated  to  better  support  MISO  SIRC  in  future  operations. 

Not  all  NS  methods  and  techniques  can  be  used  effectively  in  today’s  MISO 
SIRC.  The  NS  had  highly  skilled  and  professional  writers,  artists,  researchers,  and 
filmographers.  MISO  military  occupational  specialists  are  not  trained  at  the  professional 
level  the  NS  party  had  at  their  disposal.  These  voids  can  be  corrected.  Efforts  to  increase 
education  in  sociology,  psychology,  social  media,  imagery,  art,  and  history  will  provide 
highly  educated  and  professional  MISO  operators  to  greatly  improve  support  for  future 
military  operations. 


13 


CHAPTER  3 


RESEARCH  METHODOLOGY 

This  research  will  use  the  qualitative  research  method  to  answer  the  primary 
question  was  NS  propaganda  effective  in  influencing  the  German  people  to  believe  or 
conform  to  NS  ideology?  The  secondary  question  is  what  can  be  derived  from  NS 
propaganda  that  can  help  improve  MISO  synchronize  information  related  capabilities, 
methods,  and  techniques  using  the  MISO  Target  Audience  Analysis  Process  (TAAP)? 
There  is  an  absence  of  material  relating  to  the  study  of  MISO  methods  and  techniques 
compared  to  NS  propaganda  methods  and  techniques.  A  qualitative  method  of  research 
will  rely  on  historical  research  and  analysis  from  major  sources  of  information  in  order  to 
be  accurate  and  reliable  in  presenting  analysis  and  conclusion  of  information.  Primary 
sources  that  are  not  available  at  the  Combined  Arms  Research  Library,  Fort 
Leavenworth,  Kansas,  were  sought  at  other  collections,  libraries,  and  colleges. 

The  research  methodology  takes  into  account  both  internal  and  external  validity  to 
ensure  accurate  conclusions  are  drawn.  Internal  validity  refers  to  the  data  it  yields  to 
allow  the  researcher  to  draw  accurate  conclusions  about  cause-and-effect  and  other 
relationships  within  the  data.24  External  validity  refers  to  results  applying  to  situations 
beyond  the  study  itself  to  which  conclusions  can  be  generalized  to  other  contexts25  For 
the  purposes  of  internal  validity,  this  paper  uses  the  triangulation  strategy.  Paul  D.  Leedy 


24Paul  D.  Leedy  and  Jeanne  Ellis  Ormond,  Practical  Research:  Planning  and 
Design ,  8th  ed.  (Upper  Saddle  River,  NJ:  Prentice  Hall,  2005),  104. 

25Ibid„  105. 


14 


and  Jeanne  Ellis  Ormrod  define  the  strategy  in  “Practical  Research:  Planning  and  Design” 
as: 


Multiple  sources  of  data  are  collected  with  the  hope  that  they  will  all  converge  to 
support  a  particular  hypothesis  or  theory.  This  approach  is  especially  common  in 
qualitative  research;  for  instance,  a  researcher  might  engage  in  many  informal 
observations  in  the  field  and  conduct  in-depth  interviews,  then  look  for  common 
themes  that  appear  in  the  data  gleaned  from  both  methods.  Triangulation  is  also 
common  in  mixed-method  designs,  in  which  both  quantitative  and  qualitative  data 
are  collected  to  answer  a  single  question.26 

External  validity  is  also  important  to  research  to  determine  useful  information 

beyond  the  subject  and  time  period  studied.  This  paper  is  limited  in  using  a  representative 

sample  to  improve  external  validity  as  defined  by  Leedy  and  Ormrod  as: 

Whenever  we  conduct  research  to  learn  more  about  a  particular  category  of 
objects  or  creatures. . .  we  will  often  study  a  sample  from  that  category  and  then 
draw  conclusions  about  the  category  as  a  whole  .  .  .  The  human  race  is  incredibly 
diverse  in  terms  of  culture,  child-rearing  practices,  educational  opportunities, 
personality  characteristics,  and  so  on.  To  the  extent  that  we  restrict  our  research  to 
people  with  a  particular  set  of  characteristics,  we  may  not  be  able  to  generalize 
our  findings  to  those  with  a  very  different  set  of  characteristics.  Ideally,  we  want 
the  participants  in  a  research  study  to  be  a  representative  sample  of  the  population 
about  which  we  wish  to  draw  conclusions.27 

The  limitation  in  using  external  validity  is  the  lack  of  access  to  people  who  have 
experienced  events,  conditions,  and  perceptions  of  NS  propaganda  in  Germany.  What 
information  is  available  is  in  personal  accounts,  biographies,  video  documentaries,  and 
historical  data.  External  validity  is  critical  but  limited. 

An  example  of  external  validity  is  written  in  Frederic  Tubach  and  Sally 
Patterson’s  book  German  Voices:  Memories  of  Life  During  Hitler ’s  Third  Reich.  Frederic 
Tubach  stated: 


26Ibid.,  89. 
27Ibid.,  100. 


15 


My  own  childhood  (from  ages  three  to  eighteen)  in  Nazi  Germany  and  my 
research  and  teaching  as  a  professor  of  German  at  the  University  of  California, 
Berkeley,  have  shaped  my  insights  as  well,  particularly  concerning  the  pre-World 
War  II  years.  As  I  heard  people’s  stories  and  read  letters  and  other  documents,  it 
became  increasingly  clear  to  me  that  a  crucial  aspect  in  the  study  of  the  Nazi 
years  is  generally  neglected,  namely,  the  role  of  the  everyday  in  shaping 
individual  Germans’  experiences  and  beliefs — their  Lebenswelt ,28 

All  attempts  to  adhere  to  these  methods  and  strategies  will  be  done  in  order  to 

ensure  the  research  will  be  credible. 

The  sources  used  to  conduct  the  research  for  this  study  all  agree  that  propaganda 
was  either  effective  in  their  portrayal  of  the  NS  ideology  and  briefs  and  for  a  majority  of 
the  people  propaganda  reinforced  the  belief  that  they  already  held.  This  research  provides 
lessons  clearly  applicable  using  TAAP  and  should  be  assessed  even  more  to  support 
MISO  doctrine  today. 


28Frederic  C.  Tubach  and  Sally  Patterson,  German  Voices:  Memories  of  Life 
During  Hitler's  Third  Reich  (Berkeley,  CA:  University  of  California  Press,  2011),  3. 


16 


CHAPTER  4 


ANALYSIS 

U.S.  Army  MISO  forces  are  trained,  educated,  equipped,  organized,  mission- 
tailored,  and  purpose-designed  to  influence,  inform,  and  direct  foreign  audiences  and 
populations  in  a  manner  consistent  with  U.S.  national  objectives.1  They  plan,  develop, 
and  deliver  information  to  inform  and  influence,  and  assess  its  effects.2  They  do  this  to 
maintain  stability,  avert  crises,  create  understanding,  deter  aggression,  and  prevent 
escalation  of  armed  conflict  on  the  part  of  state  and  nonstate  actors,  their  sympathizers 
and  supporters.3 

In  limited  conflict  and  major  combat  operations  MISO  are  combat  multipliers  in 
that  they  increase  the  effectiveness  of  combat  power,  protect  friendly  forces,  reduce  the 
likelihood  of  noncombatant  injury,  and  erode  the  enemy’s  will  to  resist.4  This  is  done 
through  effecting  behavior  change  to  create  conditions  where  military  operations  result  in 
fewer  friendly,  civilian,  and  enemy  casualties;  and  shorten  engagements,  thereby  limiting 
the  consequences  of  collateral  damage.5  In  addition,  by  influencing  and  informing,  MISO 
can  save  lives  and  ultimately  reduce  suffering,  undermine  enemy  objectives,  increase 


*U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-53,  1-1. 
2Ibid„  1-4. 

3  Ibid.,  1-1. 

4Ibid. 

5Ibid. 


17 


purpose  and  potency  of  U.S.  military  and  interagency  operations  on  the  contemporary 
and  future  battlefield,  and  ease  the  transition  to  sustainable  peace.6 

During  conflict,  the  end  state  of  the  commander  is  to  impose  his  will  on  the 
enemy  and  destroy  that  enemy’s  ability  to  resist.7  FM  3-53  Military  Information  Support 
Operations,  states: 

Commanders  increasingly  recognize  the  physical  and  psychological  effects 
military  activities  have  on  populations.  As  such,  they  rely  on  information-related 
capabilities  in  all  phases  of  military  operations  to  amplify  the  effectiveness  of 
lethal  and  nonlethal  engagements.  Synchronization  of  word  and  deed  matter  more 
as  the  media  and  the  Internet  carry  both  across  borders  and  boundaries,  and 
emerging  technologies  and  social  media  increase  access  at  the  individual  level  to 
the  media.  Accordingly,  MISO  offer  commanders,  interagency  partners,  and  HN 
and  PN  counterparts  a  means  to  inform  and  influence  individuals  and  groups  in 
ways  that  support  strategic,  operational,  and  tactical  objectives.8 

The  timing  of  actions  and  messages,  the  environment  and  climate  in  which  they 

carry  out,  and  the  manner  in  which  they  are  delivered  are  critical  to  influencing  the 

enemy’s  decision-making  process  and  subsequent  behavior.9  With  precise  messages  and 

purposeful  actions  delivered  for  effect  at  the  most  advantageous  time,  place,  and 

duration,  MISO  can  be  very  effective.10 

MISO  draws  from  multiple  disciplines  to  ensure  that  relevant,  timely,  and 

effective  messages  are  conveyed.11  A  few  of  these  disciplines  are:  social  and  behavioral 


6Ibid. 

7Ibid„  1-4. 

8Ibid„  1-1. 

9Ibid„  1-4. 

10Ibid.,  1-1. 

“Ibid.,  1-5. 


18 


sciences,  advertising,  cultural  anthropology,  humanities,  language,  and  cultural  studies.12 
To  increase  the  effectiveness  of  the  MISO  message,  specialists  such  as  radio  and 
television  broadcasters,  journalists,  photographers,  graphic  artists,  printers,  and  media 
design  and  development  specialists  are  used. 

Multiple  disciplines,  combined  with  specialists,  provide  a  foundation  for  which 
synchronized  information  related  capabilities  are  devised,  developed,  delivered,  and 
assessed.  The  TAAP  is  used  to  determine  best  methods  and  techniques  to  reach  a  target 
audience.  As  discussed  in  chapter  2,  TAAP  is  the  research  and  analysis  method  for 
developing  MISO  programs  and  series  using  a  ten  step  process,  of  these,  Seven  are 
relevant  to  this  study.  The  ten  step  process  is  always  trying  to  answer  the  four  questions 
discussed  in  chapter  2  as  to  what  the  best  methods  and  techniques  to  reach  a  specified 
target  audience  are. 

The  analysis  of  NS  propaganda  using  the  TAAP  framework  will  define  the 
conditions,  vulnerabilities,  lines  of  persuasion  (LOPs),  symbols,  accessibility  and 
effectiveness  of  the  NS  propaganda.  It  is  the  framework  for  this  analysis. 

Conditions  are  those  existing  elements  that  affect  the  target  audience,  but  over 
which  the  target  audience  has  limited  control.'1  These  conditions  are  stimulus, 
orientation,  and  behavior.  Stimulus  is  an  event  or  issue  that  has  occurred  that  makes  the 
target  audience  outward  observation  of  the  current  state  of  existence,  orientation  is  what 
the  target  audience  feels  or  thinks  about  a  given  stimulus,  and  behavior  is  the  outward 


12Ibid. 

13U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302  (2005),  6-5. 


19 


observation  or  inaction  after  being  exposed  to  a  stimulus  and  filtering  it  through  one’s 
own  orientation.14 

Vulnerabilities  are  the  needs,  wants,  or  desires  that  arise  from  the  conditions  of  a 
target  audience.15  They  are  what  influence  the  target  audience.  The  number  of  conditions 
that  support  the  vulnerability  determines  the  strength  of  the  vulnerability.  The  desire  of 
the  target  audience  to  fulfill,  alleviate,  or  eliminate  a  vulnerability  provides  motivation 
for  the  target  audience  to  change  its  behavior.16 

A  line  of  persuasion  (LOP)  is  an  argument  used  to  obtain  a  desired  behavioral 
response  by  exploiting  vulnerabilities  of  a  target  audience.  It  is  a  detailed,  thorough,  and 
concise  argument  that  persuades  the  target  audience  to  behave  in  the  desired  manner. 

Symbols  are  visual  (graphic  or  short  textual),  audio,  or  audiovisual  means  used  to 
convey,  reinforce,  or  enhance  a  LOP.17  To  be  effective,  symbols  must  be  recognizable, 
meaningful,  and  relevant  to  the  target  audience. 

Accessibility  is  defined  as  the  availability  of  an  audience  for  targeting  by  MISO 
operators.  It  identifies  what  media  can  reach  the  target  audience  and  to  what  degree  the 
target  audience  can  be  influenced  by  each  media  type. 

Effectiveness  is  the  ability  of  the  target  audience  to  achieve  the  desired  behavioral 
change.18  By  determining  effectiveness,  MISO  operators  can  accurately  target  audiences 

14Ibid„  6-6. 

15Ibid. 

16Ibid. 

17Ibid„  6-7. 

18Ibid. 


20 


that  have  the  greatest  probability  of  achieving  the  SPO.  To  determine  if  a  target  audience 
is  going  to  be  effected,  it  has  to  have  some  degree  of  control  over  its  environment,  the 
authority  to  act,  and  the  power  to  accomplish  the  MISO  objective.  However,  no  target 
audience  is  all-powerful,  and  all  target  audiences  have  some  limits  in  their  environment 
such  as  sociological  or  psychological  barriers.  MISO  has  no  legal,  economic,  or  physical 
control  over  others,  only  the  perception  of  control,  if  believed. 

Condition 

The  first  step  in  understanding  how  to  reach  a  specific  target  audience  is  to 
understand  the  condition  of  that  audience.  The  condition  of  the  audience  will  provide 
insight  to  the  behavior  or  the  inaction  of  an  audience  when  exposed  to  stimulus. 

By  the  1920s  many  Germans  believed  that  the  defeat  in  World  War  I  was  a  result 
of  the  Jews  and  communists  within  the  Reich.19  The  Jews  were  seen  as  corrupt 
manipulators  of  economic  and  banking  conditions  and  the  communists  as  destroyers  of 
the  German  way  of  life.  They  were  also  outraged  by  the  requirement  pay  huge 
reparations,  as  well  as  the  confiscation  of  their  overseas  empire  and  the  navy.20  The 
military  and  political  elite  responsible  for  the  defeat  blamed  their  errors  on  the  new 
Weimar  Republic,  which  had  accepted  the  peace  terms  imposed  by  the  victors.21  When 
Germany  could  no  longer  keep  up  the  reparation  payments,  the  French  occupied  the 
Ruhr.  This  forced  German  politicians  to  sign  into  law  economic  policies  which  caused 

19Geoffrey  Parker,  The  Cambridge  Illustrated  History  of  Warfare:  The  Triumph  of 
the  West  (Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press,  2008),  298. 

20Ibid. 

21Ibid. 


21 


massive  inflation,  destroying  the  savings  of  the  middle  class  as  well  as  trust  on  which  the 
republic  depended  for  its  stability.22 

The  common  German  citizen  was  devastated  by  the  failures  of  the  Weimar 

government,  the  loss  of  a  war  that  they  thought  they  were  winning,  the  increase  of 

Bolshevik  communism  in  Germany,  the  perceived  failure  of  the  war,  malice  of  the  Jews, 

and  the  economic  sanctions  and  oppression  that  destroyed  the  German  economy. 

The  common  German  citizen  saw  no  end  to  the  continual  spiral  of  destruction  of 

their  society.  A  once-proud  people,  rooted  in  history  of  kingdoms  and  knights,  conquests, 

and  patriotism  could  not  put  food  on  the  table  to  feed  their  families.  Their  pride  was 

taken  from  them  and  there  was  no  vision  of  when  they  were  going  to  be  lifted  out  of  the 

abyss.  The  constant  fighting  among  individuals  over  politics  and  the  economy,  and 

pushing  the  blame  onto  the  government  provided  opportunities  for  people  like  Adolf 

Hitler  to  use  oralatorical  skills  and  emotional  expressionism  to  wedge  individuals  against 

the  Weimar  government  and  support  change. 

A  German  citizen  living  in  a  major  city  expressed  his  view  of  what  he  perceived 

was  the  common  German  citizen’s  view  of  the  time  period: 

Over  succeeding  generations,  however,  that  original,  idyllic  community  had  been 
destroyed  by  a  process  of  economic  and  social  modernization  that  culminated  in 
nineteenth-century  industrial  capitalism.  Traditional  German  values  had  been 
replaced  with  the  values  of  the  market-place,  a  capitalism  that  was  increasingly 
associated  with  notions  of  liberalism  and  parliamentary  democracy.  Moreover, 
these  changes  had  not  been  the  result  of  anonymous,  impersonal  forces  -  quite  the 
contrary,  it  was  the  Jews  above  all  others  who  had  subverted  and  undermined  the 
original  German  tradition.  Indeed,  in  early  vo/kisch  thinking,  the  very  definition 
of  what  it  was  to  be  German  was  conceived  in  part  in  contradistinction  to  the 
Jews.  The  Volk  was  stable  and  settled  -  the  Jews  were  wandering  and  rootless;  the 
Volk  was  spiritual,  the  Jews  were  materialist;  the  Volk  was  the  epitome  of  healthy 


22Ibid. 


22 


rural  life,  the  Jews  embodied  the  decadence  and  corruption  of  the  life  of  the  city. 
Moreover,  the  Jews  were  not  a  separate  group  in  open  conflict  with  the  Volk :  they 
had  penetrated  into  the  very  heart  of  German  society  and  culture,  and  it  was  this 
penetration  that  had  undermined  the  strength  and  the  purity  of  the  German  people. 
...  In  short,  the  Jews  were  the  enemy,  and  it  was  only  through  their  destruction 
that  Germany  could  ever  be  reborn.23 

Through  this  condition  analysis,  MISO  can  leam  how  experiences,  environments, 
beliefs,  customs,  and  events,  affect  an  individual  or  group’s  perception  of  the  world.  It 
frames  their  beliefs  and  frames  the  reason  why  an  individual  or  group  might  act,  react,  or 
respond,  or  not  react,  to  a  certain  stimulus.  It  begins  to  open  the  MISO  operators 
understanding  of  the  individual  or  group  and  prepares  the  MISO  operator  for  the  next 
step  of  the  TAAP. 


Vulnerability 

The  vulnerability  of  the  German  people  drew  on  the  needs,  wants,  or  desires  that 
arose  from  the  conditions  of  their  life  and  experiences.  German  vulnerabilities  were 
motivations  to  change  their  condition. 

The  German  people  wanted  stability  in  their  life.  They  wanted  a  revived  and 
strong  Germany  so  that  their  lives  and  the  next  generation  of  Germans  could  be  as 
honorable  and  proud  as  they  once  were.  They  desired  to  end  the  Treaty  of  Versailles’s 
burdens,  solve  the  perception  of  Jewish  control  of  banking  in  Germany,  and  return  to  a 
state  of  normalcy  with  a  strong  economy,  good  jobs,  and  new  vision  of  prosperity. 

An  example  of  German  vulnerability  is  in  the  expression  of  a  German  citizen 
during  the  early  part  of  1933  when  he  stated,  “Germans  were  already  gripped  by  a  fear  of 
chaos  and  anarchy,  and  when  the  parliament  building,  a  symbol  of  their  tenuous 

23Tubach  and  Patterson,  German  Voices ,  68. 


23 


democracy,  went  up  in  flames  in  Berlin,  their  extraordinary  desire  for  security  increased 
dramatically.”24 

Vulnerability  is  the  catalyst  to  developing  the  theme  and  message  to  inform  and 
influence  a  target  audience.  MISO  can  learn  from  the  vulnerability  of  the  German  people 
that  the  conditions  were  optimal  for  propaganda  to  build  on  their  fears.  Fear  is  a  factor 
that  should  not  be  overlooked  when  developing  a  MISO  campaign. 

Line  of  Persuasion  (LOP) 

A  LOP  is  an  argument  used  to  obtain  a  desired  behavior  or  attitude  from  the  target 
audience.25  A  line  of  persuasion  is  a  detailed,  thorough,  and  concise  argument  that, 
ideally,  will  persuade  the  target  audience  to  behave  in  a  desired  manner.  Propaganda  and 
MISO  use  slogans  to  support  the  LOP  argument.  A  slogan  is  a  word  or  phrase  that  is  easy 
to  remember  and  is  used  by  a  group  or  business  to  attract  attention.  The  NS  used  LOPs 
and  slogans  extensively  in  their  propaganda.  When  used  properly,  slogans  take  on  further 
meaning  in  a  target  audience  which  reinforce  and  support  the  LOP. 

Some  examples  of  slogans  are: 

Arbeit  Macht  Frei  (Work  makes  you  free).  The  saying  was  used  before  the  NS 
was  formed  but  became  a  NS  slogan  over  time.  It  was  used  as  a  slogan  for  the  Weimar 
Republic  Public  Works  Program  that  was  intended  to  provide  work  for  the  unemployed. 


24Shirer,  The  Rise  and  Fall  of  the  Third  Reich ,  272. 

25U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  (2005),  6-7. 


24 


It  was  used  over  the  main  gates  at  a  number  of  Nazi  concentration  camps  such  as 


Auschwitz,  Dachau,  Thereseinstadt,  and  Sachsenhausen.26 

Ftihrer  befiehl,  wirfolgen  dir !  (Fuehrer  command,  we'll  follow  you!).  This  was  a 
popular  saying  used  at  rallies  and  speeches  by  followers  of  the  NS.  It  originally  came 
from  the  song  Von  Finnland  bis  zum  Schwarzen  Meer  (From  Finland  to  the  Black  Sea).27 

Heim  ins  Reich  (Back  home  into  the  Reich).  This  statement  was  very  popular  in 
describing  Adolf  Hitler's  initiative  to  convince  ethnic  Germans  of  the  desirability  to  be 
reunited  with  Greater  Germany.  These  included  areas  such  as  Austria,  the  Sudetenland, 
Danzig,  western  Poland,  and  regions  ceded  by  the  Treaty  of  Versailles.28 

Wann  clem  Fiihrer  wuste!  (If  the  Fiihrer  only  knew!).  This  was  an  expression 
common  during  the  Third  Reich  among  those  who  supposed  that  Hitler  could  do  no 
wrong.  The  implication  being  that  anything  in  Germany  that  was  not  quite  right  was  so 
only  because  Hitler  did  not  know  about  it.29  This  expression  was  used  in  two  ways.  For 
those  who  supported  Hitler,  it  was  used  as  an  expression  of  disgust  for  inaction  or  poor 
action  of  organizations,  people,  and  conditions.  It  was  also  used  as  a  sarcastic  comment 
for  those  who  did  not  fully  support  the  NS  ideology. 


26Wikimedia  Commons,  Category:  Arbeit  macht  frei,  imagery  of  Arbeit  macht 
frei  signage,  http://c0rnm0ns.wikimedia.0rg/wiki/Categ0ry:Arbeit_macht_frei  (accessed 
4  February  2014). 

27Yahoo  Answers,  Nazi  slogans,  https://answers.yahoo.com/question/ 
index?qid=20 1007181 14623 AAohMFR  (accessed  18  March  2014). 

28Ibid. 

29Ibid. 


25 


Ein  Volk,  ein  Reich,  ein  Fuehrer  (One  people,  one  nation,  one  leader).  This  is  the 
most  repeated  political  slogans  used  during  this  time  period.30  It  is  said  by  historian 
Joseph  Bendersky  that  the  slogan  “left  an  indelible  mark  on  the  minds  of  most  Germans 
who  lived  through  the  Nazi  years.  It  appeared  on  countless  posters  and  in  publications;  it 
was  heard  constantly  in  radio  broadcasts  and  speeches.”31  The  slogan  emphasized  the 
absolute  control  of  the  party  over  practically  every  sector  of  German  society  and 
culture.32 

NS  used  LOPs  and  slogans  extensively.  As  in  marketing,  a  catchy  phrase  or  a 
memorable  comment  transcends  boundaries  and  remains  in  the  mind  for  extended  periods 
of  time.  MISO  must  learn  that  LOPs  are  a  great  way  to  inform  and  influence  a  target 
audience  and  keep  the  message  memorable.  Over  the  many  years  in  Iraq  and 
Afghanistan,  the  ability  to  develop  memorable  messages  with  fitting  slogans  and  LOPs 
has  been  lacking.  MISO  needs  to  understand  that  the  condition  and  vulnerability  help 
development  LOPs  and  the  used  of  memorable  slogans  can  make  the  MISO  message 
more  effective. 


Symbols 

NS  symbolism  was  the  outward  expression  of  propaganda  at  its  fullest.  The  NS 
used  symbols  to  tie  emotional  responses  to  the  ideology  of  the  party.  The  Hakenkruez, 
better  known  as  the  swastika,  was  the  major  symbol  of  all  NS  imagery  and  still  has  great 

30Joseph  W.  Bendersky,  A  Concise  History  of  Nazi  Germany:  1919-1945 
(Lanham,  MD:  Rowman  and  Littlefield,  2007),  105. 

31Ibid„  106. 

32Ibid. 


26 


effect  on  the  emotions  of  individuals  today.  The  use  of  the  color  red  as  an  example  of  the 
bloodshed  by  the  German  people  is  dominant  in  all  NS  imagery.  For  example,  the  NS 
flag,  which  later  became  the  state  flag,  expressed  the  ideals  of  the  NS  and  was  used  in 
every  fashionable  display  to  create  a  sea  of  red  for  emotional  response. 

Art  work  became  controlled  by  the  NS.  An  example  is  the  poster  artwork  by  Hans 
Schweitzer,  better  known  as  the  artist  Mjolnir.  Mjolnir  created  the  image  of  what  the 
right  look  for  a  German  citizen  should  be.  Blonde  hair,  strong  jaw,  good  posture,  usually 
in  uniform,  and  possibly  with  family  or  children.  An  example  of  his  art  work  is  presented 
in  the  Illustrated  section  of  this  analysis.  One  commentator  said  of  the  effectiveness  of 
Mjolnir’s  art: 

What  lengthy  speeches  failed  to  do,  Mjolnir,  did  in  a  second  through  the  glowing 
fanaticism  of  his  powerful  art.  Mjolnir  poster  of  the  three  Storm  Troopers’  heads 
is  quintessential  Nazi  propaganda.  His  art  was  simple,  emotional,  and  powerful. 
Hitler  had  said,  “by  the  masses,  brutality,  and  physical  force  are  admired.”  These 
are  three  Nazi  fighters,  one  young,  the  second  middle-age,  the  third  an  older  man, 
who  have  all  clearly  passed  through  the  fires  of  combat,  in  the  trenches  or  the 
streets,  and  whose  faces  have  a  male  strength  verging  on  brutality.33 

The  imagery  of  mass  rallies  through  film,  newspapers,  and  books  created  a  strong 

impression  of  a  united  German  people,  devoted  to  NS  ideology  and  Adolf  Hitler.  These 

images  were  designed  to  present  Adolf  Hitler  as  the  savior  of  Germany.  That  through 

him,  all  Germans  and  anyone  who  followed  him  were  promised  a  life  of  freedom, 

prosperity,  and  devotion  of  Hitler  to  them  and  that  only  through  Hitler  could  life  become 

better.  These  images  were  sent  around  the  world  to  show  that  Hitler  brought  back  the 

honor  of  the  German  people  and  that  only  through  him  and  the  NS  could  life  be  good  and 


33Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  84. 


27 


prosperous.  On  the  day  Hitler  became  Chancellor  of  Germany,  an  observer  commented 
on  events  in  the  town  of  Konigsberg: 

On  March  6,  1933,  the  day  after  the  overwhelming  Nazi  victory  and  a  week  after 
the  Reichstagsbrand ,  the  Gottinger  Tageblatt  reported  that  the  venerable 
university  town  was  festooned  in  full  Nazi  regalia,  symbols  of  freedom  and  hope 
strictly  watched  over  by  ramrod-straight  members  of  SA  ( Sturmabteilung ,  Storm 
Troopers,  a.k.a.  “Brown  Shirts”)  and  SS  units  carrying  flaming  torches. 
Chancellor  Hitler’s  call  to  action  rang  forth  from  loudspeakers  as  he  addressed  a 
wildly  enthusiastic  crowd  in  Konigsberg  that  had  hurriedly  assembled  there  from 
all  parts  of  East  Prussia  to  join  him  in  celebration.  At  the  end  of  the  speech,  when 
a  Dutch  prayer  of  thanks  mingled  with  the  deep  metallic  voices  of  the  bells  of  the 
Konigsberg  cathedral,  thousands  of  rapt  listeners  stood  bare-headed  in  the  rain 
and  spontaneously  began  to  sing  the  German  national  anthem  Deutschland, 
Deutschland,  Uber  alles .34 

Another  example  of  symbolism  is  the  NS’s  focus  on  the  youth  as  a  reflection  of 
the  future  Germany.  The  NS  recognized  early  on  the  most  efficient  way  to  bind 
youngsters  to  the  NS  was  to  provide  them  with  the  kind  of  experiences  that  would 
guarantee  loyalty  to  the  party.  The  NS  arranged  celebrations,  marches,  sporting  events, 
and,  in  general,  a  life  filled  with  exciting  events. 

The  NS  was  able  to  shape  the  youth  through  these  events  and  many  were  willing 
to  did  what  they  were  told  in  return.  The  Night  of  the  Broken  Glass  ( Reichspogromnacht 
or  Kristallnacht )  and  the  beginning  of  the  war  on  September  1,  1939,  began  the  change  in 
attitude  towards  the  NS.  Hitler’s  earlier  slogans  about  youth  being  the  nation’s  hope  and 
future  and  young  people  acting  as  the  subjects  of  their  own  fate  changed  to  fear  of  an 
unknown  future  and  questioning  the  actions  of  the  NS. 

A  German  citizen  stated  that  the  end  of  his  youth  experience  and  view  of  Hitler 
changed  is  when  he  “realized  that  what  he  really  intended  was  for  our  generation  to  be 


34Tubach  and  Patterson,  German  Voices ,  14. 


28 


“hart  wie  Kruppstahl,  zdh  wie  Leder,  flink  wie  Windhunde ”  (hard  as  the  steel  of  Krupp, 
tough  as  leather,  and  swift  as  greyhounds) .  .  .  most  of  us  felt  uncertain  whether  we  could 
rise  to  this  challenge.  Tough  as  leather  might  be  all  right  for  some,  swift  as  greyhounds 
for  others,  but  to  ask  all  three  utopian  virtues  of  most  young  Germans  was  too  much.”35 

The  strongest  use  of  symbolism  was  the  creation  of  the  Hitler-myth  by  Joseph 
Goebbels.  Making  Hitler  the  symbol  of  the  NS  and  its  ideology  gave  focus  to  the  German 
people  that  he  was  the  single  individual  that  could  make  Germany  great  again. 

Before  1930,  the  Hitler-myth  concept  was  mostly  believed  by  a  few  hundred 
thousand  followers.36  After  the  1930  election  (18.3  per  cent  of  the  vote  for  the  NS),  the 
Hitler  myth  grew  dramatically.37  Germans  saw  in  Hitler  a  way  out  of  a  collapsed 
economy,  massive  unemployment,  and  a  growing  communist  influence.  Those  that 
surged  to  join  the  NS  were  often  already  willing  volunteers  of  the  Hitler-myth.38  A  new 
party  member  who  wrote  after  hearing  Hitler  speak  for  the  first  time,  “there  was  only  one 
thing  for  me,  either  to  win  with  Adolf  Hitler  or  to  die  for  him.  The  personality  of  the 
Fuhrer  had  me  totally  in  its  spell.”39 

The  image  of  a  dynamic,  energetic,  leader  who  offered  a  decisive  change  of 
direction  for  the  German  people  seemed  appealing.  He  also  seemed  to  have  possessed  the 

35Ibid. 

36Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Bending  Spines  (East  Lansing,  MI:  Michigan  State 
University  Press,  2004),  16. 

37Ian  Kershaw,  The  ‘Hitler  Myth  Image  and  Reality  in  the  Third  Reich  (New 
York,  NY:  Oxford  University  Press  Inc,  1987), 72. 

38Ibid. 

39Richard  Bessel,  Life  in  the  Third  Reich  (Oxford:  University  Press,  1987),  90. 


29 


ability  to  master  the  internal  political  situation  that  had  strangled  the  Weimar  government 
in  a  short  time  after  he  took  office.  Otto  Dietrich,  the  NS  Press  Chief  and  Adolf  Hitler’s 
confidant,  probably  wrote  the  most  insightful  comment  on  Hitler’s  ability  to  influence  the 
German  people  in  his  book  written  after  the  war.  It  gave  a  clear  definition  of  the 
suggestive  power  of  Hitler: 

At  one  and  the  same  time  Hitler  possessed  the  power  of  suggestion  and  the  power 
to  paralyze  opposition.  By  oratory  he  was  able  to  transmit  the  suggestive  power  of 
his  will  to  the  masses,  so  long  as  he  personally  confronted  them.  It  may  seem 
strange  today  that  a  very  large  majority  of  the  Germans  voted  for  Hitler  in 
peacetime,  thereby  confirming  his  right  to  hold  the  power  which  old  President 
von  Hindenburg  had  handed  to  him.  But  we  must  realize  that  over  the  years  Hitler 
spoke  directly  to  some  thirty-five  million  Germans  -  aside  from  the  many 
millions  who  thronged  to  see  him  whenever  he  rode  through  the  streets  of  towns 
and  villages.  Most  of  these  people  were  caught  and  carried  away  by  the 
suggestive  power  of  his  will.  We  must  recall  the  economic  misery  of  those  early 
days.  Hitler  had  pledged  himself  to  realize  the  social,  economic,  and  national  aims 
of  the  people.  He  had  preached  to  the  people  in  the  moving  terms  of  morality  and 
national  purity.  It  is  not  strange;  therefore,  that  Germans  were  spellbound  by  his 
personality,  that  they  placed  their  trust  in  him.  His  initial  successes  justified  that 
trust,  strengthened  it.  Even  in  his  later  years  his  followers  remained  under  his 
influence.  For  that  influence  operated  on  an  emotional  plane;  the  intellect  could 
not  shake  it  off,  even  when  doubts  arose.  His  personality  acted  upon  the  emotions 
of  the  masses  in  such  a  way  as  to  paralyze  their  reasoning  processes.  That  fact 
explains  many  things  that  otherwise  appear  incomprehensible  today.40 

The  1936  Berlin  Olympics  was  another  NS  symbol  of  power,  strength,  and 

prosperity  to  the  world  that  catapulted  the  political  party  onto  the  international  stage.  A 

German  visitor  from  one  of  the  provinces  stated: 

Truly,  this  city  has  adorned  itself  in  a  festive  garb.  Clean,  scrubbed  down,  freshly 
painted  house  fronts,  clean  streets  on  which  you  could  not  find  even  the  smallest 
piece  of  paper.  This  cleanliness  really  gets  the  attention  of  the  visitors.  The  main 
street,  Unter  den  Linden,  is  no  longer  recognizable.  The  endless  row  of  flags  and 
the  ocean  of  lights  at  nightfall  when  the  new  lanterns  are  lit  leave  a  profound 


40Otto  Dietrich,  The  Hitler  I  Knew:  Memoirs  of  the  Third  Reich ’s  Press  Chief 
(New  York,  NY:  Skyhorse  Publishing,  2010),  9. 


30 


impression  on  us  visitors,  and  it  even  impresses  the  Berliners,  who  are  not  easily 
fooled.41 

Symbols  are  critical  to  supporting  propaganda  and  MISO  in  reaching  the  target 
audience.  When  a  symbol  supports  a  message  then  the  symbol  takes  on  more  depth  and 
relevance  to  the  message.  When  MISO  is  supporting  messages  through  LOPs  and 
symbols,  the  MISO  message  can  be  more  effective.  Combining  the  LOP  and  the  symbol 
makes  each  element  more  memorable  and  recognizable  as  to  what  the  message  is.  The 
target  audience  can  be  more  accessible  and  susceptible  to  the  LOP  and  the  symbol  when 
they  are  tied  to  the  message.  In  today’s  marketing  world,  this  is  called  branding;  tying 
slogans,  images,  color,  symbols  and  music  to  a  product.42  MISO  must  take  full  advantage 
of  symbols  and  to  do  so  is  the  requirement  to  understand  the  target  audience. 

MISO  cannot  support  the  establishment  of  a  central-myth  or  the  build-up  of  a 
youth  program  for  ideological  control.  US  national  policy  does  not  support  MISO 
conducting  this  type  of  action.  What  can  be  learned  is  the  counter  to  the  central-myth 
figure  and  youth  control.  When  adversarial  propaganda  is  employed  for  this  purpose, 
MISO  can  look  at  the  various  aspect  of  the  central-myth  symbol  and  focus  on  the 
weaknesses  or  falsehoods  of  the  character.  An  example  of  when  this  was  done  is  the 
character  breakdown  of  Osama  Bin  Laden.  There  are  several  counters  to  his  central-myth 
character  that  were  used,  such  as  he  was  a  foreign-fighter  sending  locals  to  fight  his  war, 
he  was  killing  fellow  Muslims  for  his  cause,  his  was  wealthy  and  sending  poor  Muslims 


4lBessel,  Life  in  the  Third  Reich,  134. 

42Marc  Gobe,  Emotional  Branding:  The  New  Paradigm  for  Connecting  Brands  to 
People  (New  York,  NY:  Allworth  Press,  2001),  2. 


31 


to  fight  in  his  place,  and  he  was  a  criminal  in  Saudi  Arabia.  The  messages  were  not  only 


presented  through  US  sources  but  also  through  Middle  Eastern  sources. 

Accessibility 

Accessibility  is  defined  as  the  availability  of  an  audience  for  targeting  by  MISO.43 
It  helps  determine  which  media  platform  is  the  best  to  reach  a  target  audience.  It  looks  at 
what  media  is  available,  how  the  target  audience  uses  each  media,  and  analyzes  the 
dynamics  of  the  target  audience  when  accessing  each  particular  media.44 

The  NS  used  every  media  platform  available  to  distribute  propaganda.  They 
consistently  combined  the  LOPs  with  symbols  when  applicable,  and  constantly  expressed 
the  importance  of  being  a  united  people  for  the  good  of  greater  Germany. 

One  of  the  NS  propaganda  methods  to  convey  Volks gemeinschaft  was  the  use  of 
radio.  The  radio  was  a  new  form  of  communication  in  the  world.  It  became  popular  in 
Europe  in  the  1920s  but  very  few  people  had  radios  in  their  homes.  It  was  common  to 
visit  public  places  (beer  halls  and  community  centers)  to  listen  to  the  music  and  news 
radio  until  home  radios  became  affordable  in  the  early  1930s.  During  the  era  of  the 
Weimar  Germany  from  1920  to  1933,  radio  broadcasts  were  controlled  by  the  Postmaster 
General’s  office.45  In  March  1933,  Chancellor  Hitler  transferred  this  power  to  the 


43U.S.  Department  of  the  Army,  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  (2005),  6-4. 

44Yale  University.  Philip  Hamilton  Macmillan  Memorial  Publication  Fund,  The 
Goebbels  Experiment:  A  Study  Of  The  Nazi  Propaganda  Machine  (New  Haven,  CT:  Yale 
University  Press,  1943),  21. 

45Ibid„  22. 


32 


Ministry  of  Public  Enlightenment  and  Propaganda  and  placed  Joseph  Goebbels  at  the 
head. 

Goebbels  believed  that  radio  was  the  most  effective  way  of  conveying  a  message 
to  the  masses.46  He  is  quoted  as  saying,  “What  the  press  has  been  in  the  Nineteenth 
Century,  radio  will  be  for  the  Twentieth  Century.”47  His  philosophy  was  based  on  his 
perception  that  the  public  went  to  the  cinema  for  entertainment  but  radio  could  provide 
entertainment  in  their  homes  while  also  conveying  the  messages  to  support  the 
Volks gemeinschaft.  He  also  believed  the  radio  would  reach  the  bystander  or  intended 
listener  who  did  not  read  newspapers  as  many  people  did  not  read  newspapers. 

Radio  broadcasts  played  to  the  Nazi  ideals,  building  upon  national  pride, 
patriotism,  pride  in  Hitler,  and  Aryan  pride.  All  households  that  possessed  a  radio  had  to 
pay  2  marks  a  month  to  cover  the  cost  of  radio  broadcasting.48  To  ensure  that  all 
households  could  have  a  radio,  Goebbels  arranged  for  the  production  of  two  cheap  types 
of  radios  priced  at  35  and  72  marks  that  were  known  as  “People’s  Receivers”.49 

Goebbels  also  used  radio  broadcasts  to  spread  the  word  of  NS  abroad.  He  wanted 
to  convey  to  the  world  the  idea  that  NS  was  an  acceptable  political  idea  and  his  first  radio 
broadcasts  were  performances  by  some  of  Germany’s  top  orchestras  and  opera  singers. 
Once  this  approach  had  captured  people’s  attention,  he  introduced  a  system  whereby  little 

46Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  38. 

47 Aristotle  A.  Kallis,  Nazi  Propaganda  and  the  Second  World  War  (New  York, 
NY:  Palgrave  McMillan,  2008),  31. 

48Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  41. 

49Ibid. 


33 


messages  were  broadcast  in  between  the  programs  to  in  an  effort  to  spread  the  words  of 
Hitler  in  a  minimalistic  way.  The  broadcasts  covered  all  of  Western  Europe  and  a  huge 
broadcasting  station  at  Essen,  near  Berlin,  ensured  that  broadcasts  could  be  heard  around 
the  world.  By  1938,  shortwave  broadcasts  were  being  transmitted  24  hours  a  day  in 
twelve  different  languages.50 

The  use  of  the  radio  for  NS  propaganda  was  especially  effective  because  the  party 
leaders  were  effective  public  speakers.  Radio  provides  a  way  for  the  listener  to  feel 
emotion  that  cannot  be  expressed  as  well  in  print.  Radio  broadcasts  created  an  illusion  of 
reality  by  developing  the  narrative  of  a  united  Germany,  struggling  together  for  a  just 
cause,  and  the  greatness  of  Germany  to  be  achieved  through  Hitler.  Under  the  influence 
of  such  an  illusion,  listeners  may  be  swayed  into  accepting  opinions  as  facts  and  making 
decisions  based  on  emotion.  Under  ordinary  circumstances,  listeners  could  not  hear 
programs  twice,  and  have  no  time  to  make  considered  judgments  of  what  radio  voices 
may  tell  them.  This  was  evident  in  the  radio  broadcasting  of  the  infamous  Nuremberg 
rallies  as  people  were  swept  up  in  the  euphoria.  The  NS  set  up  huge  loudspeakers 
mounted  in  public  places  for  everyone  to  hear  the  broadcasts.  Cafes  and  restaurants  had 
the  radios  turned  on  for  everyone  to  hear.  People  throughout  Germany  were  transfixed  to 
the  drama  of  the  event.51 

MISO  use  radio  as  a  means  to  broadcast  messages  to  a  target  audience.  It  is  used 
to  influence  the  populace  using  messages  supporting  U.S.  national  objectives.  It  is 

50Glenn  Aylett,  Transdiffusion,  Hitler’s  radio,  http://www.transdiffusion.org/ 
radio/radiofeatures/hitlers_radio  (accessed  7  February  2014). 

5 'Kershaw,  The  ‘Hitler Myth’ ,  56. 


34 


important  to  understand  that  radio  can  be  used  effectively  if  the  message  being  broadcast 
is  informative,  emotional,  and  pertinent  to  the  receiver.  Many  MISO  programs  used  in  the 
Iraq  and  Afghanistan  wars  were  mundane  and  ineffective  due  to  the  nature  of  playing 
music  followed  by  a  message  or  talk  show  targeted  more  to  what  the  military  wanted  than 
laying  out  a  course  of  action  desired  by  the  listener.  MISO  needs  to  reevaluate  the 
potential  of  radio,  focus  on  its  ability  to  broadcast  over  a  large  area,  and  be  more  effective 
in  its  messaging. 

Another  Nazi  propaganda  method  was  the  use  of  printed  products.  Newspapers, 
posters,  and  handbills  were  used  to  as  printed  products  have  longetivty  as  compared  to 
radio  or  mass  rallys.  The  Nazi  Party  bought  a  newspaper  in  Munich  called  the  Volkischer 
Beobachter  (The  National  or  People’s  Observer).  The  newspaper  had  a  small  circulation 
and  following  the  failure  of  the  Putsch  in  1923,  the  newspaper  disappeared  from 
newspaper  stands  until  26  February  1925. 52  Within  two  months  of  its  re-launch  it  became 
a  daily  newspaper,  and  its  circulation  began  to  rise  untilin  1929  it  reached  a  figure  of 
26,7 15. 53  Unlike  the  long,  detailed  articles  and  academic  discussion  of  economic  and 
social  problems  which  characterized  the  political  presses  of  the  Weimar  Republic,  the 
Volkischer  Beobachter  wrote  short  hyperboles  on  typical  National  Socialist  themes;  the 
evil  of  Jewry  and  Bolshevism,  the  humiliation  of  the  Versailles  Treaty,  and  the  weakness 
of  the  Weimar  government,  all  of  which  were  contrasted  with  NS  patriotic  slogans  such 
as  Ein  Volk,  ein  Reich,  ein  Fuehrer  (‘One  people,  one  nation,  one  leader’).54  The  NS 

52Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  12. 

53Ibid. 

54Bytwerk,  Bending  Spines,  90. 


35 


purchased  and  used  more  newspaper  companies  to  spread  their  message.  In  1933,  they 
nationalized  all  newspapers  and  controlled  their  content.  This  allowed  them  to  invent  or 
evoke  social  conditions  they  perceived  as  a  way  of  furthering  their  goals.  Any  point  of 
view  that  did  not  adhere  to  the  party  line  was  considered  deviant  and  if  someone  said 
something  against  the  NS,  they  lost  their  accreditation  and  their  ability  to  publish.55 

Posters  and  handbills  became  visual  expressions  of  Nazism  in  art  form.  The  goal 
was  to  evoke  emotion  for  the  Volksgemeinschaft  as  well  as  for  other  purposes.  These 
included  the  projection  of  Hitler  as  the  savior  of  Germany,  rallying  individuals  to  join  the 
military,  importance  of  producing  goods  for  the  war,  and  the  importance  of  supporting 
the  war.  Other  projections  included  racial  and  anti-Semitic  views  and  beliefs, 
motherhood,  the  purity  of  the  Aryan  race,  glory  of  the  military,  and  the  evils  of  Russia, 
Great  Britain  and  the  United  States.  All  these  posters  and  handbills  demonstrated  that  the 
quality  of  art  is  important.  Poor  art  work,  does  not  succeed  in  producing  an  emotional  tie 
to  the  product.  If  art  presents  a  strong  image,  and  uses  strong  bold  colors,  with  a  dynamic 
but  short  message,  then  the  product  evokes  emotion  the  propagandist  was  trying  to  create. 

MISO  uses  posters,  handbills  and  leaflets  in  their  operation.  MISO  operators  must 
learn  that  these  types  of  products  are  critical  to  mission  success.  It  is  often  said  a  picture 
is  worth  a  thousand  words.  MISO  print  products  can  be  effective  if  the  preparation  and 
use  of  imagery  evokes  the  message  with  conviction.  Sloppy  art  work  and  poor  imagery 
make  the  message  worthless  to  the  receiver.  It  can  actually  hinder  the  overall  theme  being 
presented.  Often,  poor  imagery  evokes  anger  from  the  receiver.  When  a  poor  product  is 

55Lindley  Fraser,  Germany  Between  Two  Wars:  A  Study  of  Propaganda  and  War- 
Guilt  (London:  Oxford  University  Press,  1945),  121. 


36 


presented,  the  receiver  feels  that  the  message  is  being  “dumbed-down”  to  the  receiver. 

For  example,  poorly  drawn  posters  and  handbills  requesting  information  on  Abu  Musab 
al-Zarqawi  were  torn  down  or  tossed  back  into  Soldier’s  faces  with  the  statements,  “We 
are  not  children.  Stop  treating  us  like  one.  Your  stupid  drawings  are  childish!”  Drawings, 
cartoons,  stick-figures,  need  to  be  evaluated  to  ensure  they  expand  the  message.  There 
can  be  backlashes  against  MISO  products.  If  not  believed,  it  has  no  effect.  If  it  evokes 
negative  emotions  then  it  provides  no  avenue  to  improve  the  relationship  between  the 
MISO  operator  and  the  receiver. 

Another  reason  art  work  must  be  quality  is  to  create  longetivity.  Poor  art  work  is 
removed  because  it  is  not  pleasing  to  the  eye.  Quality  art  work  remains  displayed.  If  the 
target  audience  enjoys  the  art  work  for  more  than  the  message,  the  product  takes  on 
another  dimension  beyond  the  original  message.  For  example,  mine  awareness  Superman 
posters  distributed  in  Bosnia-Herzegovina  during  the  1990s  were  of  such  high  quality  that 
the  posters  are  still  on  display  in  some  schools  and  others  consider  them  collectors  items. 
Another  example  is  the  posters  and  art  work  from  World  War  II  are  commonly 
reproduced  and  sold  today  for  decorative  art  even  though  their  original  intent  was  to 
evoke  emotion  to  support  the  war  effort. 

MISO  operators  must  look  at  the  quality  of  artwork  being  produced  in  MISO 
products.  Getting  the  message  across  and  evoking  emotion  to  sustain  the  staying  power  of 
the  image  in  support  of  the  message  is  critical  to  the  success  of  the  MISO  messaging. 

One  of  the  most  dramatic  Nazi  propaganda  techniques  was  the  use  of  film.  Alfred 
Hugenberg,  the  press  baron  and  leader  of  the  right-wing  Conservative  National  People's 
Party  (DNVP),  bought  the  largest  and  most  prestigious  German  film  company,  Ufa 


37 


( Universum-Film-Aktiengesellschaft ).56  The  social  and  political  activities  of  the  Nazi 
Party  were  captured  regularly  by  Ufa  newsreels  and  shown  to  the  German  public  on  the 
large  national  network  of  Ufa  cinemas. 

An  example  of  one  of  the  dynamic  films  produced  by  the  NS  in  the  1930s  is  the 

film  Triumph  of  the  Will.  Nicholas  Reeves  wrote: 

What  made  Triumph  of  the  Will  as  effective  as  a  visual  introduction  to  the  Nazi 
movement?  The  movie  opens  with  a  view  out  the  window  of  an  airplane.  The 
spectator  (eye  of  the  camera)  sees  clouds  move  by  swiftly  as  the  plane  descends 
for  a  landing — a  new  visual  experience  for  most  Germans,  who  had  never  flown 
in  an  airplane.  The  anonymous  spectator,  a  German  Everyman  who  takes  in  this 
novel  scene — clouds,  sky,  and  the  city  slowly  unfolding  below — though  not 
identified  until  after  the  landing,  is  Hitler,  who  debarks  to  a  tumultuous  reception 
at  the  Nazi  Party  Rally  in  Nuremberg,  the  Reichsparteitcig  of  1934.  In  this 
opening  scene,  the  identification  between  Hitler  and  the  passive  moviegoer  takes 
place  on  a  preconscious  level:  the  eye  of  the  camera  and  the  eyes  of  the  viewers 
watching  the  film  in  theaters  all  over  Germany  turn  out  to  share  Hitler’s  own  field 
of  vision  as  his  JU-52  prepares  to  set  down  in  Nuremberg.  The  documentary  then 
switches  to  individual  Germans  pursuing  various  private  tasks  as  they  prepare  to 
participate  in  the  mass  rally.  Their  activities  are  familiar  to  all:  the  old  woman 
peering  out  the  window  from  behind  geranium  boxes;  young  men  polishing  their 
shoes,  washing  themselves,  or  playing  catch  in  a  springtime  meadow.  The 
backdrop  to  all  this  is  a  sundrenched  Nuremberg,  the  ancient  and  familiar  city  of 
the  trade  guilds  and  the  Meistersinger,  though  now  it  is  festooned  with  swastikas 
and  striking  streamers.  As  the  film  continues,  individual  Germans  slowly 
transform  into  a  mass.  In  one  scene,  uniformed  members  of  an  Arbeitsdienst 
(work  brigade)  are  lined  up  in  formation,  with  each  member  shouting  out  in  turn: 
“Comrade,  where  are  you  from?”  and  another  member  of  the  group  answering, 
“From  the  Alps,”  or  another,  “From  the  seashore.”  The  subliminal  message  is 
clear:  only  in  this  tightly  knit  formation  is  it  possible  for  them  to  hear  and  contact 
each  other,  to  ask  questions  and  give  answers  as  to  their  origins.  The  scene 
concludes  with  a  ritual  chant  by  the  entire  group  that  gives  voice  to  their  solidarity 
as  one  body.  Similar  transformations  of  the  individual  are  repeated  throughout  the 
documentary,  up  to  the  climax,  when  approximately  100,000  Nazi  Party 
members,  all  assembled  on  the  Nuremberg  rally  grounds,  are  organized  into  two 
huge  blocks  of  black  (the  brown  color  of  the  Nazi  uniforms  in  a  black  and  white 
film)  separated  by  a  broad  white  concrete  pathway,  on  which  Hitler  walks,  slowly 
and  silently,  up  to  the  tribune  and  the  speaker’s  platform.  The  masses  now 
become  an  aesthetic  foil;  all  individual  differences  are  obliterated  in  a 


56Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda,  14. 


38 


metamorphosis  that  presents  only  one  individual,  Adolf  Hitler,  in  splendid 
isolation.  This  central  scene  of  the  Nazi  celebration  brings  us  back  to  the 
beginning  of  the  documentary,  where  the  eye  that  sees  is  initially  our  own;  the 
propaganda  equation  is  solved  as  we  have  become  him,  and  he  us.  Depicted  in 
this  way,  the  masses  are  a  centerpiece  of  Nazi  aesthetics,  signifying  power.  The 
film  creates  a  realm  of  its  own,  one  in  isolation  from  anything  around  it,  and 
Hitler  emerges  in  the  middle  as  a  self-contained  symbol  devoid  of  any 
contingencies.57 

Riefenstahl's  film  achieved  its  objective.  Its  purpose  was  to  align  the  LOP  with 
the  symbols  of  the  NS  and  heighten  the  Hitler-myth  to  increase  the  level  of  excitement 
and  devotion  to  Hitler  and  the  NS.  The  film  constructed  a  complex  and  powerful  portrait 
of  the  new  National  Socialist  nation  -  masculine,  disciplined,  loyal,  rooted  in  its  medieval 
past,  yet  looking  forward  with  confidence  and  optimism  to  its  brave  new  future.58  The 
two  central  themes  were  of  Adolf  Hitler  and  the  supportive  German  people,  united 
together  in  one  cause  for  a  better  and  stronger  Germany.  Rudolf  Hess,  the  NS  Deputy 
Fuehrer,  spoke  the  last  words  in  the  film,  summing  up  the  propaganda  message  and  belief 
for  all  Germans  to  follow,  “The  Party  is  Hitler.  But  Hitler  is  Germany,  just  as  Germany  is 
Hitler.  Hitler!  Sieg  Hei 7!”59 

NS  used  the  power  of  imagery  to  portray  what  cannot  be  seen  through  the  radio. 
The  Germans  who  participated  at  Nuremberg  were  portrayed  as  representing  the  entire 
Volk ,  but  in  reality  they  were  a  visual  expression  of  propaganda  for  Hitler  being 
portrayed  as  the  savior  of  Germany.  To  create  such  a  grand  impression,  members  of  the 
various  Nazi  organizations  from  the  entire  country  came  together,  arriving  by  train,  bus, 


57Nicholas  Reeves,  Power  of  Film  Propaganda:  Myth  or  Reality?  (London: 
Continuum  International  Publishing,  2004),  119. 

58Ibid„  120. 

59Ibid. 


39 


and  bicycle  and  filling  the  parade  grounds  with  the  brown  uniform  of  the  NS.60  For 
moviegoers  sitting  in  a  dark  theater,  it  must  have  been  a  huge  impression  of  united  and 
strong  Germans.  For  most  Germans,  the  broad  band  of  white  concrete  on  which  Hitler 
slowly  marched  up  to  the  speaker’s  platform  in  Nuremberg  created  an  extraordinary, 
defining  image  and  moment. 

These  films  gave  participants  as  well  as  film  goers  a  powerful  image  of  strength, 
unification,  glory,  and  determination.  The  rallies  would  whip  up  mass  enthusiasm  and 
passion  for  the  NS  cause.  Symbolism  was  everywhere.  The  red  flag  of  the  NS  became  the 
national  flag  of  Germany,  the  massive  display  of  well  organized  and  perfectly  in-line 
Soldiers,  the  wide  area  shots  showing  the  thousands  upon  thousands  of  participants 
screaming  and  yelling  in  support  of  their  leader.  Hitler’s  part  was  the  personification  of 
the  victorious  leader,  who  would  give  an  emotional  speech  about  Germany’s  rise  from 
the  abyss  as  a  defeated  nation  to  a  nation  restructured,  reorganized,  and  revived  to 
become  a  great  nation  for  thousands  of  years  to  come.  These  images  were  designed  to 
create  emotion  and  they  did.  The  films  were  sent  all  over  the  world  and  they  had  great 
effect,  both  for  and  against  the  NS  cause. 

Another  example  of  film  and  its  influence  was  the  film  Hilterjunge  Quex.  It  was  a 
film  created  specifically  for  the  youth  to  join  the  Hitler  Youth.  The  movie  focused  on  the 
natural  preoccupations  of  young  Germans:  family  conflicts,  tragic  consequences,  divided 


60Ibid.,  121. 


40 


political  loyalties,  and  the  need  for  personal  guidance.61  It  was  a  film  that  helped  define 
youth  support  against  the  growth  of  communism  in  Germany.62 

Today,  film  still  creates  an  emotional  response.  Adversaries  use  film  (today’s 
technology  is  video)  to  support  their  propaganda.  Extremist  Islamic  radicals  use  videos  to 
exploit  attacks  against  Coalition  forces  in  Afghanistan  and  around  the  world.  They  use 
video  for  recruiting,  messaging,  and  promotion  of  their  ideology.  MISO  videos  have  been 
limited  in  countering  adversarial  video  propaganda  or  the  promoting  of  US  efforts  in 
Afghanistan  or  other  parts  of  the  world,  This  is  due  to  the  inability  to  get  video  to  the 
adversary  through  an  international  audience  without  having  it  affect  a  domestic  audience. 
What  MISO  videos  has  been  created  are  limited  in  depth  and  content  due  to  scope  of 
work  and  target  audience.  MISO  lack  professional  filmography  in  creating  a  body  of 
work  at  the  quality  of  Triumph  of  the  Will.  If  MISO  is  to  be  a  capable  and  an  effective 
force  multiplier  then  the  emphasis  on  video  and  its  ability  to  reach  target  audiences  needs 
to  be  explored. 

What  has  taken  over  from  film  is  the  use  of  internet  social  networking. 

Companies  such  as  YouTube,  Facebook,  and  Google+  provide  internet  users  the  ability 
to  interact  through  photo  and  video  sharing.  These  forms  of  media  are  more  susceptible 
to  marketing  and  propaganda  because  users  are  not  commonly  aware  that  influence 
techniques  are  being  used  against  them.  For  example,  the  2014  Super  Bowl  Budweiser 
commercial  of  a  dog  and  a  horse  wanting  to  be  together  played  on  human  emotions  rather 
than  a  direct  sell  to  buy  beer. 

61Tubach  and  Patterson,  German  Voices ,  52. 

62Ibid. 


41 


MISO  should  examine  the  opportunity  to  work  with  marketing  companies  to  gain 
expertise  in  order  to  better  conduct  synchronized  information  related  capabilities  against 
foreign  target  audiences.  In  today’s  age  of  electronic  media  and  communication,  the 
ability  to  disseminate  messages  and  images  is  enormous.  Videos,  pictures,  stories,  and 
information  can  span  the  world  within  minutes.  The  internet  broadcasts  mass  amounts  of 
information  that  include  adversary  propaganda.  Some  people  take  in  the  unfiltered 
propaganda  information  and  accept  it  as  truthful  or  acceptable  to  their  beliefs.  Others  may 
not  be  influenced  but  they  may  ponder  the  message  and  be  susceptible  for  further 
messaging.  MISO  must  look  into  this  dimension  and  expand  their  capabilities  to  be 
effective  in  conducting  MISO  activities  to  foreign  audiences  or  counter  adversary 
propaganda. 


Effectiveness 

Propaganda  was  effective  in  building  support  for  NS  ideology  and  the  Hitler- 
myth.  Newspaper,  film  and  radio  were  the  tools  through  which  the  ideology  was 
presented  and  the  mass  political  rallies,  marching,  and  flag  waving  was  the  physical 
evidence  that  the  ideology  was  believable. 

The  use  of  Volksgemeinschaft  was  a  line  of  persuasion  that  supported  the  goal  to 
radically  restructure  German  society.6’  The  desire  to  be  a  united  and  proud  people  was  a 
vulnerability  used  by  the  NS  to  support  Adlof  Hitler  and  his  ambition  to  expand  German 
will  across  Europe.  From  1935  to  the  summer  of  1939,  propaganda  supported  the  efforts 
to  unit  Austria  and  the  Sudatenland  with  German,  the  remilitarizing  of  the  Rhineland  and 

63Welch,  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda ,  116. 


42 


the  posters  drawn  by  Mjolnir,  a  well  known  artisit,  helped  build  support  for  joining  and 
supporting  the  armed  forces.64  The  messages  supported  the  action  and  strengthened  the 
resolve. 

An  example  of  the  NS  propaganda  effectiveness  of  the  Hitler-myth  was  spoken  by 
a  seventeen- year-old  German  girl  prior  to  the  outbreak  of  war  with  Europe  saying  “Hitler 
was  a  great  man,  a  genius,  a  person  sent  to  us  from  heaven.  .  .  .  We  were  convinced  that 
Hitler  was  a  man  of  peace  and  would  do  everything  he  could  to  settle  things 
peacefully.”65  The  truth  is  Hitler  desired  war  and  used  his  image  to  hide  his  true 
ambitions.  Hitler  stated  in  private  conversations  that  he  used  his  “peace  image”  as  an 
alibi  towards  the  German  people,  “in  order  to  show  them  that  I  have  done  everything  to 
preserve  peace.”66 

Another  example  of  NS  propaganda  effectiveness  is  the  story  of  Soldiers  writing 
home  from  the  Russian  Front.  NS  propaganda  portrayed  communist  Bolsheviks  as 
inferior  subhuman’s  whose  ideology  would  destroy  German  society  and  way  of  life. 
German  Soldiers  fighting  through  Russia  entered  destroyed  towns  and  villages  and  saw 
the  devastation  of  burnt  homes  and  dead  bodies.  One  Soldiers  commented  on  brutality  of 
the  Russian  army  to  their  own  people,  “Adolf  and  I  are  marching  against  our  great  enemy 
Russia.  Consequently,  one  of  my  wishes  has  been  fulfilled,  as  I  was  gladly  drawn  into 
this  blasphemous  country  .  .  .  you  see  evidence  of  Jewish,  Bolshevik  cruelties  which  I  can 
hardly  believe  possible  ...  if  until  now  I  have  taken  the  declarations  of  the  government 

64Bytwerk,  Bending  Spines,  67. 

65Illse  McKee,  Tomorrow  the  World  (London:  Dent,  1960),  27. 

66Kershaw,  The  ‘Hitler Myth’ ,  144. 


43 


rather  skeptically  and  critically,  so  today  I  can  actually  acknowledge  the  truth  of  these 
reports  totally.”67  The  truth  is,  most  of  the  towns  were  actuality  destroyed  by  German 
artillery  and  aircraft.  They  put  the  blaim  on  the  Russians  to  hide  the  process  of 
exterminating  the  communists  and  Jews.  It  provided  news  footage  to  prove  the  evilness 
of  Stalin  and  the  Russian  military  towards  their  own  people. 

On  a  different  scale,  NS  propaganda  was  not  as  effective  as  believed.  Propaganda 
could  not  win  over  complete  control  of  the  German  population.  One  reason  NS 
propaganda  failed  is  the  message  presented  was  not  always  built  on  truth.  An  example  is 
the  Germany  attack  on  Poland  in  September  1939.  The  NS  launched  a  propaganda 
campaign  to  build  public  support  for  a  war  against  Poland.  The  German  press  played  up 
“Polish  atrocities,”  referring  to  real  or  alleged  discrimination  and  physical  violence 
directed  against  ethnic  Germans  residing  in  Poland.68  The  NS  staged  a  border  incident  to 
make  it  appear  that  Poland  initiated  hostilities  against  a  radio  station  in  Gleiwitz, 
Germany.  The  next  day.  Hitler  announced  his  decision  to  send  troops  into  Poland  in 
response  to  Polish  “incursions”  into  the  Reich.  The  press  was  told  by  Goebbels  to  avoid 
using  the  word  war.  They  reported  that  German  troops  had  simply  beaten  back  Polish 
attacks,  a  tactic  designed  to  define  Germany  as  the  victim  of  aggression.69  The  initial 


67Stephen  Fritz,  Frontsolclaten  (Lexington,  KY:  University  Press  of  Kentucky, 
1995),  196. 

68Reinhold  Pflugfelder,  World  War  11  Through  the  Eyes  of  A  German  Child 
(Bloomington,  IN:  Xlibris  Corporation,  2011),  36. 

69Holocaust  Encyclopedia,  Deceiving  the  Public,  Polish  border  incident, 
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007822  (accessed  7  February 
2014). 


44 


reports  worked  as  the  German  people  believed  the  reports.  As  time  passed,  the  truth  was 


discovered  and  people  began  to  question  their  support  for  Hitler  and  the  NS. 

Another  example  of  NS  propaganda  ineffectiveness  is  from  a  1935  report  from 
Munster,  Germany  noting  that  public  enthusiasm  for  NS  support  was  low.  The  sign  was 
subtle:  “since  people  fear  legal  consequences,  their  true  feelings  seldom  are  expressed  in 
public.  But  their  true  opinions  are  evident  in  the  obvious  passivity  of  the  population  with 
regard  to  the  movement’s  feelings.”70 

The  emphasis  here  is  MISO  operators  need  to  understand  that  propaganda  falters 
if  it  is  not  supported  with  verifiable  information.  Over  time,  the  German  people  began  to 
realize  that  news  presented  by  the  NSADP  was  not  reliable  and  the  government  would 
say  what  it  needed  to  say  only  to  reach  its  ends.71 

Verifiable  information  supports  the  message  and  gives  validation  to  the 
audience’s  understanding  of  the  message.  MISO  operators  should  look  not  only  at  the 
message  presented  but  verifiable  information  as  a  second  and  third  order  of  effect. 

MISO  must  understand  the  foundation  of  an  ideology  before  they  can  begin  to 
support  or  counter  the  opinions  and  beliefs  of  an  ideology.  It  is  also  critical  to  understand 
the  depth  of  the  opinions  and  beliefs  in  the  ideology  so  that  synchronized  information 
related  capabilities  can  be  directed  more  accurately  and  effectively. 


7()Kallis,  Nazi  Propaganda  and  the  Second  World  War ,  161. 
71Ibid.,  162. 


45 


CHAPTER  5 


CONCLUSIONS  AND  RECOMMENDATIONS 

Conclusions 

The  NS  used  propaganda  to  deliver  the  ideological  message  to  the  masses.  The 
endless  stream  of  propaganda  was  delivered  by  radio,  newspaper,  posters,  films, 
speeches,  rallies,  symbols,  using  lines  of  persuasion,  symbols,  imagery  and  music.  The 
German  citizen  had  daily  contact  with  propaganda.  For  example,  newspapers  were  filled 
with  controlled  news  stories  and  images,  the  radio  played  Volk  music  and  broadcast 
propaganda  speeches,  films  started  with  newsreals  about  German  life  and  the  war  effort. 
Even  more  was  the  symbolic  red  flag  on  buildings,  above  doorways,  or  hanging  outside 
windows,  a  picture  of  Hitler  was  reported  to  be  in  every  home,  and  posters  of  strong 
soldiers,  proud  workers,  and  excited  youth  lined  the  streets.  The  German  citizen  was 
inundated  with  propaganda  from  various  sources  and  it  can  be  said  the  individual  was 
influenced;  some  deeply  as  evident  by  the  mass  rallies,  marches  and  written  accounts  in 
documents  and  diaries  and  others  as  reluctant  followers  (based  on  surveys  conducted 
after  the  war).1  As  Randal  Bytwek  said,  “You  cannot  say  “Heil  Hitler”  a  dozen  times  a 
day  without  being  affected.”2 

Nicholas  Reeves  explained  how  strong  propaganda  supported  the  adulation  of 

Hitler: 

It  has  long  been  understood  that  the  construction  of  a  very  particular  set  of 

attitudes  towards  the  Fuehrer  was  at  the  heart  of  the  National  Socialist  project. 

'Kershaw,  The  ‘Hitler  Myth  ’,  263. 

2Bytwerk,  Bending  Spines,  159. 


46 


The  proposition  that  Adolf  Hitler  was  uniquely  capable  of  effecting  that 
revolutionary  transformation  that  would  enable  Germany  once  more  to  achieve  its 
'true'  destiny  was  so  important,  not  only  because  it  encapsulated  a  positive, 
optimistic  vision  of  the  future,  but  also  because  it  presented  a  powerful  icon  of 
unity  in  an  otherwise  deeply  divided  political  culture.  Moreover,  popular  as  Hitler 
was  when  he  took  power  in  1933,  he  became  even  more  popular  in  the  years  that 
followed.  The  absence  of  free  elections  and  public  opinion  polls  makes  it  difficult 
to  be  absolutely  certain,  but  an  analysis  of  changing  attitudes  towards  Hitler 
demonstrates  a  remarkable  rise  in  popularity  right  through  the  first  six  years  of 
Nazi  rule;  by  the  time  Hitler  celebrated  his  fiftieth  birthday  in  April  1939,  a 
Sopade  report  accepted  that  the  extent  of  popular  devotion  to  Hitler  was  not  a 
figment  of  the  propagandists'  imagination:  it  derived  'from  a  naive  faith  which  is 
not  so  easily  destroyed'.  Further,  the  spectacular  military  victories  in  the  early 
months  of  the  war  served  only  to  intensify  that  adulation  and,  by  the  early 
summer  of  1941,  Hitler  was  more  popular  than  ever.  An  SD  report  commented  on 
'the  childlike  trust  [with  which]  the  most  ordinary  people  in  particular  look  up  to 
the  Fuehrer',  and  this  and  other  reports  repeatedly  demonstrate  that  any  anxieties 
which  people  had  about  the  future  of  the  war  were  dissipated  by  their 
unquestioning  faith  in  Hitler.  The  Party,  other  Nazi  leaders,  even  the  military 
commanders,  were  fallible  and  capable  of  making  mistakes  -  Hitler  alone  could  be 
relied  on  to  do  only  what  was  in  the  best  interests  of  the  nation.  Hardly  surprising, 
then,  that  Goebbels  commented  at  the  time  that  'the  creation  of  the  Fuehrer  myth' 
was,  indeed,  his  greatest  propaganda  achievement.3 

As  stated  in  the  introduction,  the  difference  between  propaganda  and  military 
information  support  is  propaganda  is  designed  to  influence  internal  and  external 
audiences  while  MISO  only  targets  foreign  audiences  (external).  The  two  activities  use 
the  same  methods  (tools)  and  techniques  (the  use  of  themes,  messages,  lines  of 
persuasion)  to  reach  their  audience.  The  purpose  of  each  activity  is  also  the  same;  to 
influence  the  audience  through  emotional  appeal  in  order  to  change  behavior  in 
accordance  to  each  activities  objective.  Because  propaganda  and  MISO  are  comparable  in 
action  and  activity,  studying  NS  propaganda  will  prepare  the  MISO  operator  to  be  more 
effective  in  applying  MISO  methods  and  techniques.  Understanding  the  past  will  prepare 
MISO  operators  to  be  more  effective  in  the  future. 


’Reeves,  Power  of  Film  Propaganda ,  95. 


47 


The  positive  messages  and  images  of  a  powerful  leader,  nationalism  and  a  strong 
military  were  portrayed  by  the  NS  as  the  means  to  a  greater  Germany.  The  negative 
persecution  of  the  Jews  and  undesireables,  and  control  of  speech  and  civil  rights  were 
portayed  as  required  to  become  the  greater  Germany.  MISO  draws  upon  Western 
democracy  and  the  universals  of  civilization,  not  on  totalitarian  and  socialist  views  which 
carry  an  undercurrent  of  control  and  deception.  This  difference  is  what  makes 
propaganda  and  MISO  diverge  in  their  methods  and  techniques  in  messaging. 

We  must  not  forget  that  MISO  does  not  support  NS  ideology  or  any  past  or 
current  practice  of  the  ideology.  MISO  operators  do  not  support  acts  conducted  by  the 
Ghestapo  or  SS  agents  who  falsly  imprisoned,  raped,  murdered,  and  slaughtered  innocent 
people  who  were  against  or  did  not  conform  to  NS  ideology. 

The  key  to  any  propagandist  or  MISO  operator  is  understanding  the  condition  of 
the  target  audience,  their  vulnerabilities,  plausible  lines  of  persuasion,  use  of  symbols, 
determining  if  they  are  susceptible  to  the  symbols  and  lines  of  persuasion,  getting  the 
message  to  the  target  audience  and  observing  the  effects.  NS  propaganda  understood  the 
importance  of  these  elements  in  their  efforts  to  maintain  the  perception  that  the  NS  was  in 
control  of  all  activities  of  the  German  citizen.  MISO  operators  can  learn  to  apply  these 
elements  more  effectively  to  create  improved  MISO  campaigns  and  to  be  successful  in 
influencing  the  target  audience. 

It  is  imperative  that  MISO  evaluate  the  TAAP  and  begin  to  understand  the  depth 
of  a  target  audience’s  belief  systems,  culture,  current  conditions,  emotions,  imagery, 
symbolisms,  and  vulnerabilities.  Only  through  this  understanding  can  MISO  be  more 


48 


effective  in  conducting  SIRC  and  create  better  short-term  and  long-term  effects  that  can 
persuade  audiences  to  support  military  objectives. 

And  finally,  since  the  TAAP  is  our  method  of  determining  the  best  efforts  to 
influence  the  target  audience,  the  TAAP  should  be  adhered  too.  Working  through  the 
process  is  time  consuming  and  requires  tremendous  effort.  MISO  operators  need  to 
conduct  a  thorough  analysis  to  be  effective  which  requires  research,  social,  and 
psychological  analysis.  MISO  operator  must  place  our  Soldiers  and  national  objectives 
ahead  of  the  finding  quick  solutions  to  an  ardurous  process. 

Recommendations 

1.  The  Target  Audience  Analysis  Process  must  be  taken  seriously  to  be  effective. 
The  process  of  determining  who  the  target  audience  is  and  then  delving  deep  into  the 
history,  psyche,  customs,  perceptions,  and  vulnerabilities  must  be  done  to  make  MISO  an 
effective  tool  in  support  of  military  operations.  MISO  does  not  do  the  research  that  is 
truly  required  to  make  it  effective.  MISO  need  to  expand  its  sociological  and 
psychological  knowledge  in  the  art  of  understanding  human  beings  and  how  to 
effectively  reach  a  target  audience.  This  analysis  clearly  defined  that  the  level  of 
professionalism  of  NS  propaganda  was  formidable.  NS  propaganda  still  lingers  in  the 
history  books  and  has  affected  all  concepts  of  propaganda.  There  is  no  question  that 
people  reacted  to  the  messaging.  MISO  must  reach  this  level  of  professionalism  to  be 
effective  in  future  SIRC  endeavors.  Major  marketing  firms  understand  the  importance  of 
selling  the  message  to  an  individual  and  they  spend  millions  of  dollars  doing  it.  MISO 
may  not  have  the  money  to  invest  in  developing  professional  MISO  operators  to  a 

master’s  degree  level  but  they  should.  Lives  are  at  stake  and  so  is  the  nation. 

49 


2.  MISO  uses  multimedia  illustrators  to  produce  posters,  handbills,  magazines, 
and  computer  generated  art.  NS  propaganda  posters,  books,  and  art  works  were  extremely 
professional  in  their  approach  to  the  image  and  framework  of  the  design.  MISO 
illustrators  must  raise  themselves  to  this  level  of  quality  to  provide  credibility  to  the 
message  and  to  reach  the  target  audience  more  effectively.  Imagery  drives  emotions  and 
provokes  thought.  If  the  image  is  strong,  the  message  is  lasting  in  the  mind  of  the 
receiver.  If  the  imagery  is  bland  or  poor,  it  lowers  accessibility  for  the  receiver  and 
carries  no  long  term  affect  let  alone  any  influential  ability. 

3.  MISO  must  understand  modem  marketing  and  advertising  techniques  to 
produce  more  effective  MISO  products.  Marketing  and  advertising  focus  on  developing 
an  image  to  make  a  product  attractive  and  desireable.  They  understand  that  different 
types  of  media  provoke  or  enhance  certain  feelings  and  desires.  A  TV  commercial  does 
not  produce  the  same  effect  as  a  newspaper.  Words  spoken  in  public  does  not  produce  the 
same  effect  as  words  spoken  over  the  radio.  A  colorful  poster  do  not  produce  the  same 
effect  as  black  and  white  handbills.  Each  type  of  media  must  be  used  in  its  own  way  and 
supportive  of  the  message  being  directed  to  the  target  audience.  Understanding  the 
capabilities  of  media  through  marketing  and  advertising  techniques  will  make  MISO 
products  more  effective  in  influencing  the  targe  audience. 

4.  MISO  must  be  consistent  in  the  message  and  its  method  of  delivery.  MISO 
messaging  in  Afghanistan  was  one  of  many  agencies  delivering  the  same  message  to  the 
same  people.  MISO  operators  should  have  coordinated  with  other  agencies  to  make  sure 
all  the  message  were  supportive  of  each  other  and  saturation  would  not  occur.  For 
example,  many  of  the  agencies  in  Afghanistan  were  producing  messages  about  IEDs.  The 


50 


primary  delivery  method  was  radio,  billboards,  small  signs,  posters,  handbills  and 
internet.  Each  agency  had  mixed  lines  of  persuasion,  different  phone  numbers  to  contact 
for  the  same  issue,  different  colors,  styles  of  imagery,  and  symbols.  The  messages  should 
have  presented  a  unifed  effort  of  support  to  each  other.  Because  of  lack  of  coordination 
and  message  consistency,  the  messages  were  lost  by  information  overload.  MISO  must 
understand  importance  of  coordinated  messaging  to  best  support  the  commander’s 
objective. 

5.  MISO  operators  need  to  expand  their  knowledge  of  history,  sociology, 
psychology  and  marketing.  This  will  make  MISO  operators  more  effective  and  consistent 
in  their  approach  to  conducting  SIRC.  Analysis  of  NS  propaganda  suggests  that 
knowledge  in  these  four  disciplines  will  support  MISO  operators  in  being  more  effective 
and  responsive  to  target  audiences 


51 


ILLUSTRATIONS 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 


Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
This  is  a  typical  early  Nazi  poster  from  1921.  The  first  Nazi  posters  has  bright  red 
backgrounds  and  a  lot  of  text.  This  one  announces  that  Hitler  will  speak,  gives  the  topic, 
and  notes  that  Jews  are  prohibited  from  attending.  In  Mein  Kamp,  Hitler  wrote:  “We 
chose  red  for  our  posters,  since  it  is  vivid  and  was  the  color  that  most  aroused  our 
opponents.  It  forced  them  to  notice  and  remember  us.”  (Comment  by  Professor  Randall 
L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/ 
gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


52 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
The  Nazis  viewed  this  as  one  of  their  best  posters.  It  is  by  Mjolnir  (Hans  Schweitzer). 
The  caption  translates:  “National  Socialism:  The  Organized  Will  of  the  Nation.” 
Goebbels  claimed  that  Mjolnir  perfected  the  art  of  drawing  the  Nazi  Storm  Trooper 
(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014) 


53 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
This  vivid  poster  from  the  September  1930  Reichstag  election  summarizes  Nazi  ideology 
in  a  single  image.  A  Nazi  sword  kills  a  snake,  the  blade  passing  through  a  red  Star  of 
David.  The  red  words  coming  from  the  snake  are:  usury,  Versailles,  unemployment,  war 
guilt  lie,  Marxism,  Bolshevism,  lies  and  betrayal,  inflation,  Locarno,  Dawes  Pact,  Young 
Plan,  corruption,  Barmat,  Kutistker,  Sklarek  (the  last  three  Jews  involved  in  major 
financial  scandals),  prostitution,  terror,  civil  war.  Courtesy  of  Dr.  Robert  D.  Brooks 
(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


54 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive ,  I 
think  this  is  also  from  1932.  It  too  deals  with  Hitler’s  citizenship.  The  caption:  “A  front 
soldier  earns  his  German  citizenship.  All  German  fronts  soldiers  who,  like  Adolf  Hitler, 
earned  and  proved  their  citizenship  through  blood  and  the  risk  of  their  lives,  read  the 
‘  Volkischer  BeobachteC ,  the  newspaper  of  their  comrade  Adolf  Hitler.  Fight  for  the 
truth!  Death  to  the  lie!  Each  German  man  and  woman  will  vote  for  Adolf  Hitler!” 
Courtesy  of  Dr.  Robert  D.  Brooks  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin 
College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm 
(accessed  14  February  2014). 


55 


Oculftye! 

gtbt  6cm  Sgffrm  6ic 

mriroert  \ 
wdhlt: 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive ,  I 
think  this  dates  to  the  Spring  1932  presidential  elections,  but  I’m  not  absolutely  sure.  The 
caption  reads:  “Germans!  Give  your  answer  to  the  System!  Elect  Hitler!”  “The  System” 
was  the  pejorative  Nazi  term  for  the  Weimar  Republic.  Courtesy  of  Dr.  Robert  D.  Brooks 
(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


56 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
From  the  July  1932  Reichstag  election.  The  text  translates  as:  “We  women  vote  for  List 
2:  the  National  Socialists.”  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College 
German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14 
February  2014). 


57 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
This  interesting  poster  appeared  in  1932.  The  usual  approach  with  posters  is  to  use  color 
to  make  them  stand  out.  This  one  stands  out  because  of  Hitler’s  disembodied  face 
floating  on  a  black  background,  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin 
College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm 
(accessed  14  February  2014). 


58 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
“Work  and  Food,”  this  poster  says.  It  was  used  for  the  November  1932  Reichstag 
election.  The  Nazis  viewed  this  as  one  of  their  most  effective  posters,  (comment  by 
Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive), 
http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


59 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
This  poster  is  from  the  March  1933  Reichstag  election,  the  last  one  in  which  Germans 
had  a  choice.  The  poster  shows  President  Hindenburg  and  Chancellor  Hitler.  The  caption: 
“The  Reich  will  never  be  destroyed  if  you  are  united  and  loyal.”  Courtesy  of  Dr.  Robert 
D.  Brooks  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German 
Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February 
2014). 


60 


NS  Propaganda  Poster 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
This  1938  poster  was  issued  shortly  after  the  Anschluss  with  Austria.  The  caption:  “One 
People,  One  Reich,  One  Fuehrer.”  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin 
College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm 
(accessed  14  February  2014). 


61 


Hitler  Photograph 

Source:  Ian  Kershaw,  History  Today ,  Hitler  miming  gestures  to  a  record  of  his  speeches; 
one  of  an  extraordinary  series  of  photographs  he  commissioned  in  1925  to  aid  self- 
analysis  and  improve  his  hold  over  an  audience,  (comment  by  Ian  Kershaw), 
http://www.historytoday.com/ian-kershaw/hitler-myth  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


62 


1938  Nuremburg  Rally  Photograph 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive,  We 
tend  to  think  of  Nazism  in  black  and  white,  since  most  photographs  and  films  are  in  black 
and  white.  But  the  Nazis  used  color  to  excellent  effect.  Here  are  three  photographs  of  the 
1938  Nuremberg  rally.  This  photograph  is  of  the  S.A.  rally.  Note  the  camera  on  the  white 
platform  directly  ahead  of  Hitler,  who  is  standing  at  the  front  of  the  speaker’s  platform. 
The  e  first  two  illusrations  are  from  Hanns  Kerri,  Reichstagung  in  Niirnberg  1938 
(Berlin:  Vaterlandischer  Verlag  C.  M.  Weller,  1939).  The  third  is  the  cover  of  NS 
Frauen-Warte,  the  first  October  issue  of  1938  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L. 
Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive), 
http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


63 


1938  Nuremburg  Rally  Photograph 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 

Late  in  each  rally,  there  was  a  huge  parade  in  the  center  of  Nuremberg.  If  you  have  seen 
Riefenstahl’s  Triumph  of  the  Will,  you  will  recognize  the  scene.  Second  to  the  left  is 
Rudolf  Hess,  to  the  right  Hermann  Goring,  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk, 
Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm 
(accessed  14  February  2014). 


64 


1932  Reich  Youth  Rally  in  Potsdam 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
Deutschland  erwacht:  Werden,  Kampfund  Sieg  der  NS  (  Hamburg:  Zigaretten- 
Bilderdienst  Hamburg-Bahrenfeld,  1934).  These  photographs  are  taken  from  one  of  the 
“bestsellers”  of  the  Nazi  era:  Germany  Awakes:  Growth,  Battle  and  Victory  of  the  NS. 
First  published  in  1933,  over  a  million  copies  were  in  print  by  the  following  year 
(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


65 


1933  S.A.  March  in  Dortmund 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive ,  An 
S.A.  march  in  Dortmund,  1933  (comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin 
College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm 
(accessed  14  February  2014). 


66 


1933  S.A.  March  in  Dortmund 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
Hitler  speaks  to  a  mass  meeting  of  the  S.A.  in  Dortmund,  1933  (comment  by  Professor 
Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive), 
http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


67 


Hitler  in  Dortmund,  1933 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive, 
Hitler  speaks  to  a  mass  meeting  of  the  S.A.  in  Dortmund,  1933  (comment  by  Professor 
Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive),  http://www.bytwerk. 
com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


68 


Hitler  in  Dortmund,  1933 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
Hitler  addresses  a  mass  gathering  of  the  S.A.  in  Dortmund,  1933. 

(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


69 


1933  Nuremberg  Rally 

Source:  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive , 
Hitler  A  hundred  thousand  S.S.  and  S.A.  men  at  the  1933  Nuremberg  rally 
(comment  by  Professor  Randall  L.  Bytwerk,  Calvin  College  German  Propaganda 
Archive),  http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/posters2.htm  (accessed  14  February  2014). 


70 


GLOSSARY 


Accessibility.  The  availability  of  an  audience  for  targeting  by  PSYOP. 

Adversary.  Anyone  who  contends  with,  opposes,  or  acts  against  one’s  interest.  An 
adversary  is  not  necessarily  an  enemy. 

Effectiveness.  The  ability  of  the  TA  to  carry  out  the  desired  behavioral  change 

Line  of  Persuasion.  An  argument  used  to  obtain  a  desired  behavior  or  attitude  from  the 
TA. 

Media.  Transmitters  of  information  and  Psychological  Operations  products. 

Mein  Kampf  An  autobiographical  manifesto  by  Adolf  Hitler,  in  which  he  outlines  his 
political  ideology  and  future  plan  for  Germany. 

Military  Information  Support  Operations.  Planned  operations  to  convey  selected 

information  and  indicators  to  foreign  audiences  to  influence  their  emotions, 
motives,  objective  reasoning,  and  ultimately  the  behavior  of  foreign  governments, 
organizations,  groups,  and  individuals  in  a  manner  favorable  to  the  originator’s 
objectives.  Also  called  MISO. 

Nazi  Party.  Nationalsozialistische  Deutsche  Arbeiterpartie  (National  Socialist  German 
Workers  Party. 

Propaganda.  Any  form  of  adversary  communication,  especially  of  a  biased  or  misleading 
nature,  designed  to  influence  the  opinions,  emotions,  attitudes,  or  behavior  of  any 
group  in  order  to  benefit  the  sponsor,  either  directly  or  indirectly. 

Symbols.  Visual  (graphic  or  short  textual),  audio,  or  audiovisual  means  used  to  convey, 
reinforce,  or  enhance  a  LOP. 

Target  Audience  Analysis.  A  detailed,  systematic  examination  of  Psychological 

Operations  (PSYOP)-relevant  information  to  select  target  audiences  (TAs)  that 
can  accomplish  a  given  supporting  Psychological  Operations  objective  (SPO). 

Theme.  A  theme  is  a  subject,  topic,  or  line  of  persuasion  used  to  achieve  a  psychological 
objective. 

Volksgemeinschaft.  a  “national”  or  “people’s  community”. 


71 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Bendersky,  Joseph  W.  A  Concise  History  of  Nazi  Germany:  1919-1945.  Lanham:  Rowan 
and  Littlefield,  2007. 

Bytwerk,  Randall  L.  Bending  Spines.  East  Lansing:  Michigan  State  University  Press, 
2004. 

Dietrich,  Otto.  The  Hitler  1  Knew:  Memoirs  of  the  Third  Reich ’s  Press  Chief.  New  York: 
Sky  horse  Publishing,  2010. 

Fraser,  Lindley.  Germany  Between  Two  Wars:  A  Study  of  Propaganda  and  War-Guilt. 
London:  Oxford  University  Press,  1945. 

Gobe,  Marc.  Emotioned  Branding:  The  New  Paradigm  for  Connecting  Brands  to  People. 
New  York:  Allworth  Press,  2001. 

Hitler,  Adolf.  Mein  Kampf.  Translated  by  Ralph  Manheim.  Geneva:  Houghton  Mifflin 
Harcourt,  1998. 

Kallis,  Aristotle  A.  Nazi  Propaganda  and  the  Second  World  War.  New  York:  Palgrave 
McMillan,  2008. 

Kershaw,  Ian.  The  ‘Hitler  Myth  ’:  Image  and  Reality  in  the  Third  Reich.  New  York: 
Oxford  University  Press  Inc,  1987. 

Leedy,  Paul  D.,  and  Jeanne  Ellis  Ormond.  Practical  Research:  Planning  and  Design.  8th 
ed..  Upper  Saddle  River:  Prentice  Hall,  2005. 

Lord,  Carnes,  and  Frank  R.  Barnett.  Political  Warfare  and  Psychologiccd  Operations: 
Rethinking  the  U.S  .  Approach.  Washington,  DC:  National  Defense  University 
Press,  1988. 

McKee,  Illse.  Tomorrow  the  World.  London:  Dent,  1960. 

Pflugfelder,  Reinhold.  World  War  II  Through  the  Eyes  of  A  German  Child,  Bloomington: 
Xlibris  Corporation,  2011. 

Reeves,  Nicholas,  Power  of  Film  Propaganda:  Myth  or  Reality? .  London:  Continuum 
International  Publishing,  2004. 

Shirer,  William  L.  The  Rise  and  Fcdl  of  the  Third  Reich.  New  York:  Simon  and  Schuster, 
1960. 

Sington,  Derrick,  and  Arthur  Weidenfield.  The  Goebbels  Experiment;  A  Study  of  the  Nazi 
Propaganda  Machine.  New  Haven:  Yale  University  Press,  1943. 


72 


Turabian,  Kate  L.  A  Manual  for  Writers  of  Term  Papers,  Theses,  and  Dissertations.  7th 
ed.,  Rev.  Ed.  Wayne  C.  Booth,  Gregory  G.  Colomb,  Joseph  M.  Williams,  and  the 
University  of  Chicago  Press  Editorial  Staff.  Chicago:  University  of  Chicago 
Press,  2007. 

U.S.  Army.  Command  and  General  Staff  College.  ST  20-10,  Master  of  Military  Art  and 
Science  (MMAS)  Research  and  Thesis.  Ft.  Leavenworth:  USA  CGSC,  August 
2008. 

U.S.  Department  of  the  Army.  Field  Manual  3-05.301,  Psychological  Operations  Tactics, 
Techniques,  and  Procedures.  Washington,  DC:  Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff  of  the 
Army,  2007. 

- .  Field  Manual  3-05.302,  Tactical  Psychological  Operations  Tactics,  Techniques, 

and  Procedures.  Washington,  DC:  Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff  of  the  Army,  2005. 

- .  Field  Manual  3-53,  Military  Information  Support  Operations.  Washington,  DC: 

Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff  of  the  Army,  January  2013. 

- .  Field  Manual  101-5-1,  Operational  Terms  and  Graphics.  Washington,  DC: 

Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff  of  the  Army,  September  1997. 

Yale  University.  Philip  Hamilton  Macmillan  Memorial  Publication  Fund,  The  Goebbels 
Experiment:  A  Study  Of  The  Nazi  Propaganda  Machine.  New  Haven:  Yale 
University  Press,  1943. 

Welch,  David.  The  Third  Reich:  Politics  and  Propaganda.  New  York:  Routledge,  2007. 


Other  Sources 


Aylett,  Glenn.  “Hitler’s  Radio.”  Transdiffusion  Broadcasts.  http://www.transdiffusion. 
org/radio/radiofeatures/hitlers_radio  (accessed  7  February  2014). 

Business  Dictionary.  Definitions,  http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/ 
propaganda.html  (accessed  10  March  2014). 

Calvin  College  German  Propaganda  Archive.  Speeches,  posters,  art  work,  digital  books 
and  articles,  http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ww2era.htm  (accessed  18 
March  2014). 

Hitler,  Adolf.  Mein  Kampf  Vol.  1  A  Reckoning,  “War  Propaganda.” 

http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/  (accessed  7  January  2014). 

Holocaust  Encyclopedia.  Deceiving  the  Public.  Polish  border  incident. 

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007822  (accessed  7 
February  2014). 


73 


Merriam- Webster’s  Dictionary.  “Propaganda.”  http://www.merriam- 
webster.com/dictionary/propaganda  (accessed  18  March  2014). 

Wikimedia  Commons.  Category:  Arbeit  machtfrei.  imagery  of  Arbeit  macht  frei  signage. 
http://cornmons.wikimedia.0rg/wiki/Category:Arbeit_macht_frei  (accessed  4 
February  2014). 

Yahoo  Answers.  Nazi  slogans,  https://answers.yahoo.com/question/ 

index?qid=20 1007181 14623 AAohMFR  (accessed  18  March  2014). 


74