Originally posted by the Voice of America.
Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America,
a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in
the public domain.


Seeking a Way Forward in Afghanistan, Tillerson Pushes for Diplomacy

by Nike Ching

   STATE DEPARTMENT --

   While President Donald Trump's administration is seeking a reason to
   keep American troops in Afghanistan after 16 years of war, U.S.
   officials are also examining options to stabilize conflicts in the
   region, including a dialogue that would move forward a peace process.

   Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is not advocating for military
   options, but looking to facilitate a dialogue between Kabul and the
   Taliban, according to the State Department.

   "I think one of the things that the secretary feels very strongly about
   is trying to develop -- get to a place where we can have some sort of a
   peace process. And that means actually sitting down and talking with
   members of the Taliban and starting to facilitate that kind of
   dialogue," State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert said earlier
   this week.

   "Ultimately, like in many situations in many other countries, military
   options or our military strategy is not necessarily going to win those
   countries and put peace back together," Nauert told VOA. "It's part of
   it. But in the long run, you have to bring both sides to the table or
   multiple sides to the table together to determine their future."

   Policy under review

   The Trump administration has yet to complete its policy review to
   stabilize Afghanistan. Officials say it will likely be weeks before a
   plan is finalized and announced.

   When Trump was asked by a reporter on July 20 whether he would deploy
   additional American troops to the war-torn country, the president
   responded: "We'll see."

   Trump's team is said to split over how to stabilize Afghanistan.

   The military contingency -- National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster,
   Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
   General Joseph Dunford -- all seem to agree with their commander on the
   ground that a troop increase in Afghanistan should be one part of a
   complex solution.

   "But the secretary of state is not going to advocate or is not going to
   work on Mr. McMaster's behalf or on General Mattis' behalf," Nauert
   said. "Our piece of it to work on is more from the diplomacy standpoint
   and humanitarian assistance."

   Dangers of security over diplomacy

   Some analysts warn of the danger of prioritizing security over
   diplomacy. They argue Washington should find a comprehensive strategy,
   which addresses many of the challenges Kabul is facing.

   "I really think that the Trump administration could really suffer
   politically if it were to commit to an open-ended troop commitment in
   Afghanistan, which seems to be one of the directions that it is
   considering going," Michael Kugelman, deputy director for South Asia at
   the Wilson Center, told VOA.

   "It has to be a strategy, it cannot be limited to a security solution,"
   Kugelman said. "We really need to be thinking about the diplomatic
   strategy, and specifically, how to engage with the Afghan government,
   which is in a lot of trouble."

   In a recent interview with VOA's Afghan Service in Kabul, former Afghan
   President Hamid Karzai said he strongly opposed a policy that sends a
   message to intensify the war.

   Instead, Karzai said he supported a U.S. strategy that is meant to
   pursue peace, promote unity and foster good relations with
   Afghanistan's neighbors.

   "A surge of troops will lead to the intensification of war in the
   country. I wholeheartedly and strongly oppose it. We want peace, peace
   and peace," Karzai told VOA.

   Meanwhile, responding to a [1]New York Times report that Afghanistan's
   mineral wealth may be a reason for Trump to remain engaged in the
   country, Nauert told VOA on Thursday that she had seen the report, but
   with the Afghanistan policy review still under way, she would not get
   ahead of the final decisions made by the president.

   "They will come to conclusion about that," she said.

References

   1. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/25/world/asia/afghanistan-trump-mineral-deposits.html