Originally posted by the Voice of America.
Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America,
a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in
the public domain.


Facing Challenges, Trump Administration Defends Immigration Ban

by VOA News

   U.S. President Donald Trump's administration defended his executive
   order banning entry to refugees and people from seven Muslim-majority
   countries Sunday, while rights groups vowed to keep pressing legal
   action, thousands of people protested in cities across the country and
   Democrats prepared to issue legislation to block the ban.

   "It really is a massive success story in terms of implementation on
   every single level," a senior administration official told reporters.
   The comments came in what is called a background briefing where the
   source agrees to answer questions, but not to be identified by name.

   The order, signed Friday, includes a 120-day suspension of refugee
   admissions and a 90-day entry ban for people from Iraq, Iran, Syria,
   Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Yemen.

   The implementation led to confusion, particularly at the nation's
   airports, where in some cases people holding green cards as permanent
   legal residents were detained for extra questioning before being
   allowed entry.

   Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly issued a statement Sunday
   seeking to clarify the policy, saying he deems "the entry of lawful
   permanent residents to be in the national interest."

   In a separate statement, the Department of Homeland Security said the
   government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if necessary
   for national security. That followed an emergency order by federal
   court in New York temporarily barring the deportation of people who
   arrive at U.S. airports with a valid visa or an approved refugee
   application.

   Judge Ann Donnelly wrote, "There is imminent danger that, absent the
   stay of removal, there will be substantial and irreparable injury to
   refugees, visa-holders, and other individuals from nations" who are
   subject to the president's order.

   Trump has repeatedly called for stricter screening of refugees, and the
   senior administration official who briefed reporters Sunday described
   the previous system as "woefully inadequate."

   Under President Barack Obama's administration, refugees were required
   to undergo security checks, including strict vetting by law enforcement
   and intelligence agencies, and extensive interviews before they were
   allowed into the country. For many refugees, the process took up to two
   years to complete.

   Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic
   Relations, told VOA's Urdu service Trump's order goes against the
   values of Americans who have historically welcomed those fleeing
   persecution and war.

   "Donald Trump did not convince any of us that he has sound legal or
   national security concerns. For example, the Syrian refugees are
   subjected to at least two years of scrutiny and extreme vetting
   already, and once they come here they are safe, they are vetted. There
   is no terrorist attack that happened at the hands of a Syrian refugee,
   or any refugee, that we know," Awad said. "So for him to base all his
   executive order on [that] false notion is un-American, unethical."

   The executive order cites the September 11, 2001 terror attacks that
   killed nearly 3,000 people, but does not apply to Saudi Arabia, where
   most of the hijackers involved were from.

   Iran, Syria and Sudan are on the State Department's list of state
   sponsors of terrorism, while Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Somalia are listed
   as terrorist safe havens.

   Sudan's Information Minister Ahmed Bilal told VOA's English to African
   service that his country hopes Trump will lift the ban after the 90-day
   period is up. He said he thinks the order will damage the U.S. "because
   it will make America almost isolated from the world."

   He also said Sudan had been looking forward to improving relations with
   the United States, and that there is "no reason" for Sudan to be among
   those listed as a sponsor of terrorism.

   The designation has been in place since 1993 over concerns about Sudan
   supporting terror groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and its role in
   the mid-1990s as a "safe haven and training hub" for groups like
   al-Qaida.

   Senior Republican U.S. Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who are
   members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, criticized Trump's
   order Sunday, saying the confusion at airports showed the measure was
   "not properly vetted."

   "We are particularly concerned by reports that this order went into
   effect with little to no consultation with the Departments of State,
   Defense, Justice and Homeland Security," they said in a joint
   statement. "Such a hasty process risks harmful results."

   Trump responded on Twitter, calling McCain and Graham "weak on
   immigration" and saying they should be focused on Islamic State,
   illegal immigration and border security.

   Other congressional reaction

   Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat, called the words from McCain and
   Graham a "strong statement" and said they should work together.

   "I will introduce a bill this week to immediately overturn this
   dangerous, hateful order," he posted on Twitter.

   Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell expressed support Sunday for
   more strict screening, but said he is against religious tests.

   "I think it's a good idea to tighten the vetting process," he told ABC
   News. "But I also think it's important to remember that some of our
   best sources in the war against radical Islamic terrorism are Muslims,
   both in this country and overseas."

   Republican Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona said Trump is right to be
   concerned about national security, "but it's unacceptable when even
   legal permanent residents are being detained or turned away."

   People affected by order

   Twenty-eight-year-old Iranian national Neda Daemi, a 16-year legal U.S.
   resident, was released after being detained for 10 hours Saturday.
   Daemi spoke with two lawyers and added she was not asked to sign any
   papers. She said she had flown to Los Angeles from Tehran where she was
   visiting family members.

   Somali refugee Binto Siyad Aden and her children were released late
   Saturday after they were detained in Virginia. They had arrived on a
   family reunion visa from Kenya.

   Aden's husband, Farhan Sulub Anshur - a U.S. citizen from Minnesota -
   said he believes his wife and two children were released after a court
   intervened.

   "You can't image our joy and feelings now. They have been released and
   we are here together at a hotel near the airport," Anshur said.

   He told reporters his wife was subjected to harsh treatment from law
   enforcement while in detention at the airport.

   "They harassed her and threatened her with handcuffs and arrest; they
   forced her to sign a form stating that her and her children will be
   deported, but she refused to sign for the kids and told them their
   father is an American citizen," he said.