Originally posted by the Voice of America.
Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America,
a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in
the public domain.


Fake News Roils Indonesian Politics

by Krithika Varagur

   JAKARTA --

   Last month, the leader of a hard-line Muslim group, the Islamic
   Defenders Front (FPI), was hospitalized after being beaten up by the
   Indonesian military at his own headquarters.

   Actually, nothing of the sort happened. But thousands of Indonesians
   still think it did, thanks to an enormously popular fake news story
   that circulated ahead of a mass protest in Jakarta December 2.

   Several websites alleged that FPI leader Habib Rizieq, who helped
   organize the protest against Jakarta's ethnic Chinese governor, was
   abused by the state -- a provocative, albeit false, claim that roused
   public sentiment.

   Radical Muslim cleric Habib Rizieq (center) tries to calm his
   supporters as they escort him away from the higher prosecutors' office
   in Jakarta, April 21, 2003.

   Fake news is not new in Indonesian politics, despite its ascent as a
   buzzword after this year's U.S. presidential election. Blatantly false
   stories have circulated within the social-media-loving populace since
   at least 2014, when they threatened to derail the campaign of current
   president Joko "Jokowi" Widodo. But they have taken on a particularly
   inflammatory zeal in recent months, when sectarian tensions have been
   high because of the blasphemy trial of Jakarta governor Basuki "Ahok"
   Tjahaja Purnama.

   This week, military General Gatot Nurmantyo stated that the fake news
   revealed foreign interference in Indonesian politics. It's not clear
   this is the case, but it's still striking that Indonesia's government,
   which is notorious for censorship, hasn't been able to stop the problem
   by just blocking problematic sites.

   New Jersey, Australia, or neither?

   The fake news about Habib Rizieq was traced to servers in New Jersey
   and Australia, Gatot told the press this week. But this isn't
   necessarily evidence of meddling foreign interests.

   "The Habib Rizieq story was actually a convoluted clickbait ad for an
   online gambling website, jitupoker.biz," said Damar Juniarto, founder
   of the Digital Democracy Forum. "That site was already shut down by the
   Ministry of Communications, by the way. It's a common practice of
   online gambling sites to use masking IP addresses from foreign
   countries to dodge Indonesian laws that prohibit online gambling."

   Still, said Juniarto, the story's timing was perfect for maximum
   outrage: it circulated November 20, right between the two hard-line
   rallies in Jakarta on November 4 and December 2.

   Fake news spreads particularly fast in Indonesia because its citizens
   are such heavy users of social media and mobile phones, said Juniarto.
   It proliferates not just on Facebook and Twitter, but also messaging
   platforms like WhatsApp.

   "We can trace the explosion of fake news to the rise of social
   networking," he said. "It started as a 'joke,' then it became a
   business, and now it's being used as a 'political strategy.'''

   Stoking the anti-Ahok flames

   "Every day on social media we find stories or memes that are proven
   untrue. It is really worrying, to be honest," said Raja Juli Anthoni, a
   spokesperson for Ahok's campaign.

   Even the blasphemy accusation against Ahok arose, in part, from a piece
   of doctored media.

   "This blasphemy case started when Buni Yani, a lecturer at Paramidan
   University, posted an edited version of Ahok's speech quoting the
   Qur'an on Facebook," said Tubaghus Ramadhan, a social media consultant
   who has worked on both the Jokowi 2014 and Ahok 2017 campaigns. "He
   included an edited transcript of his speech that made it seem like he
   was directly insulting the Qur'an."

   In an ironic twist, Buni Yani's trial for circulating misinformation
   started the very same day as Ahok's blasphemy trial.

   Indonesia's President Joko "Jokowi" Widodo speaks to earthquake
   survivors in Tringgading, Aceh, province, Indonesia, Dec. 9, 2016.

   Parallels to Jokowi

   In a precursor to the racially charged debate around Ahok's candidacy,
   current president Jokowi also faced fearmongering about his background
   when he ran for president in 2014. He was accused of being ethnically
   Chinese, a secret Christian, and a communist.

   "Fake news about Jokowi's racial, ethnic and religious background was
   one of the most troublesome issues we faced in the 2014 general
   election," Ramadhan said.

   Jokowi eventually took a highly publicized pilgrimage to Mecca to prove
   his Muslim credentials.

   Other recent instances of fake news include allegations that a mosque
   was deliberately burned down by intelligence agents in the Christian
   province of Papua, and that Ahok drank beer at an official meeting. It
   was bottled mineral water.

   Assigning responsibility

   Following claims that fake news influenced American voters in the
   recent presidential election, Facebook this week announced an
   initiative to curb bogus content by making it easier to report and
   "disrupting financial incentives for spammers."

   Twitter and WhatsApp have yet to announce anti-fake-news measures of
   similar scale. Although these platforms should take the lead on making
   false stories harder to circulate, they can't eliminate them,
   especially because much of the damage occurs within days or hours of
   their dissemination.

   For its part, Indonesia's communications ministry has blocked several
   fake news sites, although new ones are cheap and easy to make. The
   country also walks a fine line on free speech because of its record of
   heavy-handed censorship.

   "I think we must see the fake news as a social problem, not just as a
   technological problem," Juniarto said. "We must try to understand why
   people believe in fake news, rather than news from reputable media."

   Ahok's campaign spokesperson, Anthoni, said their best strategy until
   the February election is to put out factual and positive information so
   voters can decide for themselves.

   "We believe the only way to clarify this kind of stupidity is to give
   people more valid information," he said.