The myth of stopping Covid-19 transmission via vaccination

Having been exposed to this kind of messaging for decades, people
have been persuaded to believe that vaccines stop transmission
of common respiratory viruses, despite science to the contrary.
Essentially, the messaging is marketing.
"By having the flu jab you can help protect yourself, family, friends
and loved ones - as well as the people you support. So, if you work
in the health and care sector, check with your employer whether
you are eligible for a free vaccination at your local GP practice
or pharmacy.
OK, so it's not a 100% guarantee against getting infected, but there
is strong evidence that the flu vaccine will help prevent you from
getting the flu. And if you do, it is likely to be milder and last
less long." If the implication is correct - if you don't get
vaccinated, you will potentially kill your family and (for health
care staff) patients.
Essentially, it is your duty to be vaccinated.
But it was never enforced, only a choice. Why? The idea of mandatory
vaccinations, based on transmission is not indicated by the science,
and people would not accept this.
Yet, the illusion persists through decades of mass persuasive
marketing, that a jab stops transmission.
We were prepared for the Covid shots and the propaganda that led
to hard-line implementation by decades of lies, propaganda and
marketing through health agencies. See Flu for Thought - the
background to mass misunderstanding of the issue of transmission.
The above is how the Mass Formation hypnosis was nurtured.
Softly at first, a nudge in the literature, on the walls, through MSM
to get your shot and 'save granny'.
Covid shots were not unique, and this narrative is not new.
Despite the Covid shots never being designed for nor tested for
transmission - just like the flu shots - the masses still believed
they were. They were perceiving that messaging, as a continuation
of the marketing strategy first pioneered by the flu jabs.
The Covid shots were designed for the same remit as the flu
shots - to reduce symptoms.
Like the flu shots, they turned out to be woefully ineffective, and
did not prevent hospitalisation and death. They certainly did not
and could not stop transmission. See the various Cochrane
meta-analyses of the flu vaccines, some of which are discussed here.
They were never designed to in the first place. We knew that in 2020.
Small studies were done following the introduction of the Covid jabs
that indicated a link between jabs and reduction of transmission. But
co-factors such as self-isolation were underplayed (if you don't
contact others, the virus does stop with you). And these entered the
narrative.
But they still only showed hope for an association between jabs and
transmission.
But the MSM messaging was spun into 'they stop transmission.' And
that's what everyone WANTED to hear, and what they hoped for, and
so the mass perception that they do was easily inserted into the mass
psyche. Like a viral infection!
Look at how it develops in the montage shown on the Highwire (see
the montage at the end of episode 290).
Fauci talks about stopping the virus at you, if vaccinated. The overt
statement 'the vaccine stops transmission' is not to be found. Only
by insinuation - NLP style. No mention of the virus stopping at you
as the end vector, as long as you don't pass it on, as long as you
isolate from others whilst infectious etc. As long as barrier nursing
and such is imposed in health care settings etc.
This got taken on by the MSM who overtly state this 'factoid' as
truth - 'if you get the jab, you cannot transmit and this ends the
pandemic'. Utter BS. But the seed planted by the likes of Fauci
was matured in the MSM presenter's misinterpretation, and then
overtly stated.
Then any number of interviews with people on the street allowed
to state, 'I've had my jab, so I cannot get it and cannot transmit
it', was left to MSM-led public to be the advertisers for the
product.
Nudged constantly into this perception (just like with the flu jab
propaganda), the masses reinforced the propaganda amongst themselves.
It wasn't challenged and corrected by Fauci or his ilk, and wasn't
corrected by the scientists or Pfizer, because it suits the wider
agenda to have everyone believe the lie of stopping transmission.
The narrative reinforced itself in the reservoir of public opinion
and fuelled by fear and emotion and hope etc. it became dominant.
There's logic in the idea that if your symptoms are reduced, and you
are not coughing the virus around, then yes, logically this will reduce
transmission. NOT stop it. And the impact will actually be small if
a respiratory virus is in circulation. You can't stop transmission in
society - we never tried to with flu because we know it's
unachievable. We have to live with these things.
So, there's a straight line timeline association between flu shots
and Covid shots.
There is a fundamental disconnect between the science and the
marketing and mass perception.
Even healthcare staff fall for it, so it isn't that 'the public are
stupid'. We're all vulnerable to clever psychological manipulation.
A lie repeated often enough becomes 'the truth'.
So when Pfizer admitted it didn't test for transmission, it wasn't
necessarily an 'admission' of guilt. It just restated the position
it has in 2020, to create a vaccine whose remit was to reduce
symptoms.
The FDA, CDC, MHRA, NHS, political parties, healthcare industry
spokespeople etc. were observing the effects of the jabs and were
hopeful that it would stop transmission, because some studies
indicated it 'helped' with a reduction in transmission, albeit
a small effect.
Once Pfizer had (fraudulently) given the politicians what they asked
for, it became an evolving narrative, boosted by small studies
regarding transmission, which were woven into the narrative and
over-exaggerated.
Nobody suspected this, they assumed the vaccines equal stopping
transmission, because they have been raised to believe this through
the same propaganda around the flu jabs. The soil was prepared in
the flu-jab narrative era, the seeds planted in the Covid era
narrative, and the fruits of misperception harvested and were
used to feed the illusion further.
The recent revelations by Pfizer's president of international
developed markets, Janine Small, are not revelations to us, who
have followed this from the start.
And some of us have been onto them for decades. I've criticised
the flu jab for decades and challenged the very idea of stopping
transmission, preventing hospitalisation and death as public health
fraud. The idea of saving granny by getting vaccinated is emotional
manipulation and marketing.
So when the Covid jabs came on the table in mid-2020, I knew
the same narrative would be used, the same marketing and the
world would fall into the same mass formation misperception
of what these jabs were designed to do.
I didn't consider then that they would go so far as making them
mandatory on the basis of the lie of stopping transmission. I thought
it would fail the test of scientific logic and legality. They
couldn't stand a chance in hell if they tried that one on, because
the lie would be exposed - or so I assumed. But they went ahead
and did it.
Now that the Pfizer statement is out in the open, it's a wonderful
gift to our cause, because it's shaking people's perceptions. But
there's a history here and a lot of unpacking to do when we question
how we could be persuaded by a lie, ignore science, and through
marketing and propaganda be led to believe such a huge lie, which
was largely implanted in the psyche of the masses by insinuation,
historical propaganda from the flu shot campaigns etc.
On the basis of a misperception, cultivated by the information
controllers, we have done an enormous amount of damage. So,
we do bear some responsibility as individuals to question and
oppose the mind control.
But we have been victims of the biggest, best funded, global mind
control projects in history.
We are victims, first and foremost. But to escape the victimhood,
we need to stay alert and educated, that we don't fall for the overt
and covert lies.
Because there are many more to come. Forewarned is fore-armed.
Together, in Truth, we can change the world!