A Letter to Andrew Hill

In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the
World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies
from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be
a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on
a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was
low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin
were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised
that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately
controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient
for review by regulatory authorities.”
The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin
had instead recommended against it. What were his reasons for
doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces
influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the
perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess
Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and
Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the
same time frame (Video: https://bit.ly/3tWMnpw).