Computer underground Digest Wed May 29, 1997 Volume 9 : Issue 40
ISSN 1004-042X
Editor: Jim Thomas (cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu)
News Editor: Gordon Meyer (gmeyer@sun.soci.niu.edu)
Archivist: Brendan Kehoe
Shadow Master: Stanton McCandlish
Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth
Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala
Ian Dickinson
Field Agent Extraordinaire: David Smith
Cu Digest Homepage: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest
CONTENTS, #9.40 (Wed, May 29, 1997)
File 1--Fiber Keeps Its Promise - George Gilder Essay
File 2--FBI arrests alleged hacker-for-profit
File 3--HACK - Texas Driver's License database on the web
File 4--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 May, 1997)
CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION APPEARS IN
THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 01:04:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: ptownson@MASSIS.LCS.MIT.EDU(TELECOM Digest Editor)
Subject: File 1--Fiber Keeps Its Promise - George Gilder Essay
((MODERATORS' NOTE: For those not familiar with Pat Townson's
TELECOM DIGEST, it's a an exceptional resource. From the header
of TcD:
"TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but
not exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is
circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various
telecom forums on a variety of public service systems and
networks including Compuserve and America On Line. It is also
gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated
newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Subscriptions are available to
qualified organizations and individual readers. Write and tell
us how you qualify:
* ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu * ======" ))
=============
For a few years now, the Telecom Archives has been a repository for
the several fine articles by George Gilder which have appeared in
{Forbes}. You can review the entire series by pulling them from the
archives -- http://telecom-digest.org in the subdirectory devoted
to Gilder. As in the past, Gordon Jacobson will introduce the latest
in the series.
PAT
Date--Mon, 19 May 1997 19:24:01 -0400
From--Gordon Jacobson <gaj@portman.com>
The Telecosm series of articles by George Gilder provides
some interesting technological and cultural background that helps
prepare readers to better understand and place in proper perspective
the events relative to the National Data Super Highway, which are
unfolding almost daily in the national press. I contacted the author
and Forbes and as the preface below indicates obtained permission to
post on the Internet. Please note that the preface to this article
and all footnotes must be included when cross posting or uploading
this article.
The following article, FIBER KEEPS ITS PROMISE, was
adapted from the February, 1997 Gilder Technology Report
and was published in Forbes ASAP, April 7, 1997. The
article was prepared by the author as a review and
update of important events relating to the bandwidth
paradigm Gilder has advocatated from the onset of the
Telecosm series in December of 1993.
The author has been kind enough to restate his "vision"
as a preface to this article for those on-line readers
who are unfamiliar with the series.
This article may be included in George Gilder's book,
Telecosm, which will be published in 1997 by Simon &
Schuster, as a sequel to Microcosm, published in 1989
and Life After Television published by Norton in 1992.
Subsequent chapters of Telecosm will be serialized in
Forbes ASAP.
THE GILDER VISION:
Today, communications technologies are unleashing the Internet as
the definitive force of a new industrial era, rendering the CPU
peripheral and the net central. This "paradigm shift" is fundamental
to comprehending the advent of the Telecosm.
Technological paradigms are neither artificial nor arbitrary:
they are the governing force in the practical life of human societies
and economies. Apprehended by scientists, applied and tested by
engineers, they reflect the profound - and permanent - truths of the
universe. Accordingly, the laws of the microcosm do not simply give
way to the laws of the telecosm. The microcosm is a crucial
foundation of the telecosm, and my work defines and enshrines both.
Mead's Law and Moore's Law - the laws of the microcosm - no
longer suffice to predict the future of information technology. Thus
these laws alone no longer define the future configurations of
technology and wealth in the new world economy. The microcosmic
paradigm is giving way to the telecosmic paradigm; the law of the
microcosm is giving up its supremacy to the law of the telecosm. The
law of the telecosm ordains that the total communications frequencies
rise and wavelengths drop, digital performance improves exponentially.
Bandwidth rises, power usage sinks, antenna size shrinks, interference
collapses, and error rates plummet. This powerful new paradigm is
just beginning to be felt. The vision of my work, is to anticipate
and explain necessary breakthroughs and in the process to offer a
business, investment, and career "survival map" for a new century that
is approaching all of us at the speed of light.
George Gilder - 5/16/97
FIBER KEEPS ITS PROMISE
By
George Gilder
"Today, I await the death of television, telephony, VCRs,
and analog cameras with utter confidence as Moore's law
unfolds." Rupert Murdoch, Ted Turner, John Malone, are
you listening?"
Get ready. Bandwidth will triple each year for
the next 25, creating trillions in new wealth.
Editor's note: Four years ago, Forbes ASAP published its first issue
with a stunning prophecy by contributing editor George Gilder. Fiber
optics, said George, had the potential to carry 25 trillion bits per
second down a single strand. This represented a ten-thousandfold leap
in carrying capacity over the 2.5 billion bits "barrier" long assumed
by most experts in the field. What did George see that others had
missed? One, a little-recognized (at the time) breakthrough called an
erbium-doped amplifier, which keeps optical signals pure and strong
over long distances. The other was a deep technical shift, with roots
in the 1940s-era work of information theory pioneer Claude Shannon.
If you believed Shannon, his logic dictated a new messaging scheme
called wave division multiplexing. Though scorned by the experts four
years ago, WDM now is emerging as the winner George had prophesied.
The real winners will be all of us, as the coming world of cheap,
unlimited bandwidth unfolds and at last fulfills the true potential
of the information age. Here is George with an update.
-----------
IMAGINE THAT IN 1975 YOU KNEW that Moore's law--the Intel
chairman's projection of the doubling of the number of transistors on
a microchip every 18 months--would hold for the rest of your lifetime.
What if you knew that these transistors would run cooler, faster,
better, and cheaper as they got smaller and were crammed more closely
together? Suppose you knew the law of the microcosm: that the
cost-effectiveness of any number of "n" transistors on a single
silicon sliver would rise by the square of the increase in "n."
As an investor knowing this Moore's law trajectory, you would
have been able to predict and exploit a long series of developments:
the emergence of the PC; its dominance over all other computer form
factors; the success of companies making chips, disk drives,
peripherals, and software for this machine. With a slight effort of
intellect, you could have extended the insight and prophesied the
digitization of watches, records (CDs), cellular phones, cameras, TVs,
broadcast satellites, and other devices that can use miniaturized
computer power. If you did not know precisely when each of these
benisons would flourish, you would have known that each one was
essentially inevitable. To calculate approximate dates, you had only
to guess the product's optimal price of popularization and then match
its need for mips (millions of instructions per second) of computer
power with the cost of those mips as defined by Moore's law.
Merely by using this technique of Moore's law matching--and
holding to it with unshakable conviction for nearly 20 years--I became
known as a "futurist." Today I await the death of television,
telephony, VCRs, and analog cameras with utter confidence as Moore's
law unfolds. You can tell me about the 98% penetration of TVs in
American homes, the continuing popularity of couch-potato
entertainments, the effectiveness of broadcast advertising, and the
profound and unbridgeable chasm between the office appliance and the
living-room tube. But I will pay no attention. Just you wait--Jack
Welch, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, John Malone, and David
Jennings--the TV will die and you may be too late for the Net.
It is now 1997, and a stream of dramatic events certifies that
another law, as powerful and fateful and inexorable as Moore's, is
gaining a similar sway over the future of technology. It is what I
have termed the law of the telecosm.
Its physical base lies in the same quantum realm of eigenstates
and band gaps that governs the performance of transistors and also
makes photons leap and lase. But the telecosm reaches beyond
components to systems, combining the science of the electromagnetic
spectrum with Claude Shannon's information theory. In essence, as
frequencies rise and wavelengths drop, digital performance improves
exponentially. Bandwidth rises, power usage sinks, antenna size
shrinks, interference collapses, error rates plummet.
The law of the telecosm ordains that the total bandwidth of
communications systems will triple every year for the next 25 years.
As communicators move up-spectrum, they can use bandwidth as a
substitute for power, memory, and switching. This results in far
cheaper and more efficient systems. In 1996, the new fiber paradigm
emerged in full force. Parallel communications in all-optical
networks became the dominant source of new bandwidth in telecom. Like
Moore's law, the law of the telecosm will reshape the entire world of
information technology. It defines the direction of technological
advance, the vectors of growth, the sweet spots for finance.
AMERICA'S DARK SECRET
FOR MORE THAN A DECADE, American companies have been laying
optical fiber strands at a pace of some 4,000 miles a day, for a total
of more than 25 million strand miles. Five years ago, the top 10% of
U.S. homes and businesses were, on average, a thousand households away
from a fiber node; now they are a hundred households away.
However, the imperial advance of this technology conceals a dark
secret, which has led to a pervasive underestimation of the long-term
impact of photonics. Sixty percent of the fiber remains "dark"
(unused for communications) and even the leading-edge "lit" fiber is
being used at less than one ten-thousandth of its intrinsic capacity.
This problem has prompted leaders in the industry, from Bill Gates and
Andy Grove to Bob Metcalfe and Mitch Kapor, to underrate drastically
the impact of fiber optics.
Restricting the speed and cost-effectiveness of fiber has been an
electronic bottleneck and a regulatory noose. In order for the signal
to be amplified, regenerated, or switched, the light pulses had to be
transformed into electronic pulses by optoelectronic converters. For
all the talk of the speed of light, fiber-optic systems therefore
could pass bits no faster than the switching speed of transistors,
which tops out at a cycle time of between 2.5 and 10 gigahertz.
Meanwhile, telecom companies could not deploy new low-cost fiber
products any faster than the switching speed of politicians and
regulators, which tops out roughly at a cycle time of between 2.5
years and a rate of evolution measurable only by means of carbon 14.
Nonetheless, the intrinsic capacity of every fiber line is not 2.5
gigahertz. Nor is it even 25 gigahertz, which is roughly the capacity
of all the frequencies commonly used in the air, from AM radio to kA
band satellite. The intrinsic capacity of every fiber thread, as thin
as a human hair, is at the least one thousand times the capacity of what
we call the "air." One thread could carry all the calls in America on
the peak moment of Mother's Day. One fiber thread could carry 25 times
more bits than last year's average traffic load of all the world's
communications networks put together: an estimated terabit (trillion
bits) a second.
Over the last five years, technological breakthroughs and
legislative loopholes have begun to open up this immense capacity to
possible use. Following concepts pioneered and patented by David Payne
at the University of Southampton in England, a Bell Laboratories group
led by Emmanuel Desurvire and Randy Giles developed a workable
all-optical device. They showed that a short stretch of fiber doped
with erbium, a rare earth mineral, and excited by a cheap laser diode
can function as a powerful amplifier over fully 4,500 gigahertz of the
25,000 gigahertz span. Introduced by Pirelli of Italy and popularized
by Ciena Corporation of Savage, Maryland, and by Lucent and Alcatel,
today such photonic amplifiers are a practical reality. Put in packages
between two and three cubic inches in size, the erbium-doped fiber
amplifiers (EDFAs) fit anywhere in an optical network for enhancing
signals without electronics.
This invention overcame the most fundamental disadvantage of
optical networks compared to electronic networks. You can tap into an
electronic network as often as desired without eroding the voltage
signal. Although resistance and capacitance will leach away the
current, there are no splitting losses in a voltage divider. Photonic
signals, by contrast, suffer splitting losses every time they are
tapped; they lose photons until eventually there are none left. The
cheap and compact all-optical amplifier solves this problem. It is an
invention comparable in importance to the integrated circuit.
Just as the integrated circuit made it possible to put an entire
computer system on a single sliver of silicon, the all-optical amplifier
makes it possible to put an entire system on a seamless seine of
silica--glass. Unleashing the law of the telecosm, it makes possible a
new global economy of bandwidth abundance.
Five years ago when I first celebrated the radical implications of
erbium-doped amplifiers, skepticism reigned. I was summoned to Bellcore,
where the first optical networks had been built and then abandoned, to
learn the acute limits of the technology from Charles Brackett and his
team. I had offered the vision of a broadband fibersphere--a worldwide
web of glass and light--where computer users could tune into favored
frequencies as readily as radios tune into frequencies in the atmosphere
today. But Brackett and other Bellcore experts told me that my basic
assumption was false. It was no simpler, they said, to tune into one of
scores of frequencies on a fiber than to select time slots in a
time-division-multiplexed (TDM) bitstream.
Indeed, electronic switching technology was moving faster than
optical technology. In the face of the momentum and installed base of
electronic switching and multiplexing, the fibersphere with hundreds of
tunable frequencies would remain a fantasy, like Ted Nelson's Xanadu.
In 1997 the fantasy is coming true around the world. Xanadu has
become the World Wide Web. The erbium-doped fiber amplifier is an
explosively growing $250 million business. Electronic TDM seems to
have topped out at 2.5 gigabits a second. TDM gear has suffered a
series of delays and nagging defects and so far has failed in the market.
Electronic TDM failed not only because it pushed the envelope of
electronics but also because it violated the new paradigm. In
single-mode fiber, the two key impediments are nonlinearities in the
glass and chromatic dispersion (the blurring of bit pulses because even
in a single band different frequencies move at different speeds).
Chromatic dispersion increases by the square of the bit rate, and the
impact of nonlinearities rises with the power of the signal.
High-powered, high-bit-rate TDM flunked both telecosm tests. By
contrast, wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) follows the laws of
the telecosm; it succeeds by wasting bandwidth and stinting on power.
WDM takes some 33% more bandwidth per bit than TDM, but it reduces power
to combat nonlinearity and divides the bitstream into multiple
frequencies in order to combat dispersion. Thus it can extend the
distance or increase capacity by a factor of four or more today and can
lay the foundations for the fibersphere tomorrow.
In 1996 the new fiber paradigm emerged in full force. Parallel
communications in all-optical networks, long depicted as a broadband
pipe dream, crushed all competitors and became the dominant source of
new bandwidth in the world telecom network. The year began with a
trifold explosion at the Conference on Optical Fiber Communication in
San Jose when three companies--Lucent Technologies' Bell Labs, NTT Labs,
and Fujitsu--all announced terabit-per-second WDM transmissions down a
single fiber. Sprint confirmed the significance of the laboratory
breakthroughs by announcing deployment of Ciena's MultiWave 1600 WDM
system, so called because it can increase the capacity of a single fiber
thread by 1,600%.
The revolution continues in 1997. At the beginning of January,
NEC declared that by increasing the number of bits per hertz from one to
three, it had raised the laboratory WDM record to three terabits per
second. During 1996, MCI had increased the speed of its Internet
backbone by a factor of 25, from 45 megabits a second to 1.2 gigabits.
On January 6, Fred Briggs, chief engineering officer at MCI, announced
that his company is in the process of installing new WDM equipment from
Hitachi and Pirelli that increases the speed of its phone network
backbone to 40 gigabits per second. Accelerating MCI's previous plans
by some two years, the new system will use a more limited form of
wavelength-division multiplexing to put four 10-gigabit in-cause
formation streams on a single fiber thread.
The first deployment will use existing facilities on a 275-mile
route between Chicago and St. Louis, but the technology will be extended
to the entire network. This move will consummate a nearly thousandfold
upgrade of the MCI backbone, from 45 megabits per second to 40 gigabits,
within some 36 months. Ciena, meanwhile, has announced technology that
allows transmission of 100 gigabits per second.
Its February IPO was the most important since Netscape (market
cap at the end of the first trading day: $3.4 billion). Why? Ciena is
the industry leader in open standard WDM gear. During the first six
months the MultiWave 1600 was available, through October 1996, the firm
achieved $54.8 million in sales and $15 million in net income. (Lucent
is believed to be the overall leader with more than $100 million of
mostly proprietary AT&T systems.) At the same time, the trans-Pacific
consortium announced that it would deploy 100-gigabit-per-second fiber
in its new link between the United States and Asia.
A powerful new player in these markets will be Tellabs, currently
the fastest-growing supplier of electronic digital cross-connect switches
and other optical switching gear. In a further coup, following its
purchase of broadband digital radio pioneer Steinbrecher, Tellabs has
signed up all 12 principals in IBM's all-optical team. Headed by Paul
Green, recent chairman of the IEEE Communications Society and author of
the leading text on fiber networks, and by Rajiv Ramaswami, coauthor of
a new 1997 text on the subject, the IBM group built the world's first
fully functioning all-optical networks (AONs), the Rainbow series.
Tellabs now owns the 11 AON patents and 100 listed technology disclosures
of the group.
The implications of the WDM paradigm go beyond simple data pipes.
The greatest impact of all-optical technology will likely come in
consumer markets. A portent is Artel Video Systems of Marlborough,
Massachusetts, which recently introduced a fiber-based WDM system that
can transmit 48 digital video channels, 288 CD-quality audio bitstreams,
and 64 data channels on one fiber line. Aggregating contributions from
a variety of content sources--each on different fiber wavelengths--and
delivering them to consumers who tune into favored frequencies on
conventional cable, the Artel system represents a key step into the
fibersphere. It can be used for new services by either cable TV
companies or telcos.
The deeper significance of the Artel product, however, is its use
of bandwidth as a replacement for transistors and switches. The Artel
system works on dark fiber without compression. The video uses
200-megabit-per-second bitstreams (compare MPEG2 at 4 to 6 megabytes
per second) that permit lossless transmissions suitable for medical
imaging, and obviate dedicated processing of compression codes at the
two ends.
A move to massively parallel communications analogous to the move
to parallel computers, all-optical networks promise nearly boundless
bandwidth in fiber. According to Ewart Lowe of British Telecom, whose
labs at Martlesham Heath in Ipswich have been a fount of all-optical
technology, the new paradigm will reduce the cost of transport by a
factor of 10. For example, the optoelectronic amplifiers previously
used in fiber networks entailed nine power-hungry bipolar microchips
for each wavelength, rather than a simple loop of doped silica that
covers scores of wavelengths.
As these systems move down through the network hierarchy, the
growth of network bandwidth and cost-effectiveness will not only
outpace Moore's law, it will also excel the rise in bandwidth within
computers--their internal "buses" connecting their microprocessors
to memory and input-output.
While MCI and Sprint move to deploy technology that functions at
40 gigabits a second, current computers and workstations command buses
that run at a rate of close to 1 gigabit a second. This change in the
relationship between the bandwidth of networks and the bandwidth of
computers will transform the architecture of information technology.
As Robert Lucky of Bellcore puts it, "Perhaps we should transmit signals
thousands of miles to avoid even the simplest processing function."
Lucky implies that the law of the telecosm eclipses the law of the
microcosm. Actually, the law of the microcosm makes distributed
computers (smart terminals) more efficient regardless of the cost of
linking them together. The law of the telecosm makes broadband networks
more efficient regardless of how numerous and smart are the terminals.
Working together, however, these two laws of wires and switches impel
ever more widely distributed information systems, with processing and
memory in the optimal locations.
WHAT SHOULD THE MAJOR PLAYERS DO NOW?
FOR THE TELEPHONE COMPANIES, the age of ever smarter terminals
mandates the emergence of ever dumber networks. Telephone companies
may complain of the large costs of the transformation of their system,
but they command capital budgets as large as the total revenues of the
cable industry. Telcos may recoil in horror at the idea of dark fiber,
but they command webs of the stuff 10 times larger than any other
industry. Dumb and dark networks may not fit the phone company
self-image or advertising posture. But they promise larger markets
than the current phone company plan to choke off their own future in the
labyrinthine nets of an "intelligent switching fabric" always behind
schedule and full of software bugs.
Telephone switches (now 80% software) are already too complex to
keep pace with the efflorescence of the Internet. While computers become
ever more lean and mean, turning to reduced instruction-set processors
and Java stations, networks need to adopt reduced instruction-set
architectures. The ultimate in dumb and dark is the fibersphere now
incubating in their magnificent laboratories.
The entrepreneurial folk in the computer industry may view this
wrenching phone company adjustment with some satisfaction. But computer
firms must also adjust. Now addicted to the use of transistors to solve
the problems of limited bandwidth, the computer industry must use
transistors to exploit the nearly unlimited bandwidth. When home-based
machines are optimized for manipulating high-resolution digital video at
high speeds, they will necessarily command what are now called
supercomputer powers. This will mean that the dominant computer
technology will first emerge not in the office market but in the
consumer market. The major challenge for the computer industry is to
change its focus from a few hundred million offices already full of
computer technology to a billion living rooms now nearly devoid of it.
Cable companies possess the advantage of already owning dumb
networks based on the essentials of the all-optical model of broadcast
and select--of customers seeking wavelengths or frequencies rather than
switching circuits. Cable companies already provide all the programs
to all the terminals and allow them to tune in to the desired messages.
But the cable industry cannot become a full-service supplier of
telecommunications unless the regulators give up their ridiculous
two-wire dream in which everyone competes with cable and no one makes
any money. Cash-poor and bandwidth-rich, cable companies need to
collaborate with telcos--which are cash-rich and bandwidth-poor--in a
joint effort to create broadband systems in their own regions.
In all eras, companies tend to prevail by maximizing the use of
the cheapest resources. In the age of the fibersphere, they will use
the huge intrinsic bandwidth of fiber, all 25,000 gigahertz or more, to
simplify everything else. This means replacing nearly all the hundreds
of billions of dollars' worth of switches, bridges, routers, converters,
codecs, compressors, error correctors, and other devices, together with
the trillions of lines of software code, that pervade the intelligent
switching fabric of both telephone and computer networks.
The makers of all this equipment will resist mightily. But there
is no chance that the old regime can prevail by fighting cheap and
simple optics with costly and complex electronics and software.
The all-optical network will triumph for the same reason that the
integrated circuit triumphed: It is incomparably cheaper than the
competition. Today, measured by the admittedly rough metric of mips per
dollar, a personal computer is more than 2,000 times more cost-effective
than a mainframe. Within 10 years, the all-optical network will be
thousands of times more cost-effective than electronic networks. Just
as the electron rules in computers, the photon will rule the waves of
communication.
-------------
The article above, was adapted by Forbes ASAP from
the Gilder Technology Report, February 1997.
Until recently, George Gilder's provocative and insightful
analyses of technology were only available through guest appearances
and magazine articles. With the publication of the "Gilder Technology
Report," the Gilder Technology Group now makes Geroge Gilder's vision
available to subscribers on a regular and timely basis. The Report is
written by George Gilder and is published monthly. Find out what
companies possess the technology to fulfill the Gilder Paradigm of
"Nothing But Net".
The Gilder Technology Report is designed to assist investors and
corporate decision makers in formulating strategy and tactics for the
exciting new era of technology.
For additional information, please contact the Gilder Technology
Group by calling toll-free (888) 484-2727.
Regards,
Gordon Jacobson
Portman Communication Services
(212) 988-6288
gaj@portman.com MCI Mail ID: 385-1533
Home Page: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~gaj1/home.html
---------------------
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Thank you very much Gordon for passing
along this latest essay from George Gilder, who has in fact been a
regular reader and contributor to TELECOM Digest on several occassions.
The quality of Gilder's contributions and that of several other of
the regular correspondents to the Digest is what has kept the Digest
one of the better mailing lists on the internet.
Please remember that TELECOM Digest is brought to you by you ... it
is reader financial support which makes it possible. An annual donation
of twenty dollars is suggested if you enjoy this publication and wish
to see it continue. Financial support and editorial content in the
Digest are completely independent of each other. No one is obligated
to give anything, however your gifts are extremely important to me as
I labor in preparing each issue.
Patrick Townson
TELECOM Digest
Post Office Box 4621
Skokie, IL 60076
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 11:18:34 -0800
From: "--Todd Lappin-->" <telstar@wired.com>
Subject: File 2--FBI arrests alleged hacker-for-profit
Source - fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
FBI arrests alleged hacker-for-profit
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SAN FRANCISCO (May 23, 1997 00:19 a.m. EDT) -- Federal agents arrested a
36-year-old man who allegedly stole information from the credit card
accounts of 100,000 people by hacking into the database of an
undisclosed major business, the FBI said.
Carlos Felipe Salgado Jr., of Daly City, Calif., was arrested Wednesday
as he was trying to sell information related to more than 100,000
accounts that contained names, card numbers and other personal
information about the card holders, said FBI spokesman George Grotz.
"We believe that he had access to at least 100,000 in terms of credit
card numbers -- perhaps even more," Grotz said.
"He was trying to sell it" to an undercover agent, Grotz said. "We had
determined that he was in the market to sell this information, and we
were able to contact him via the Internet and set up a meeting to
discuss terms of the sale. ... Based on those negotiations, he was
placed under arrest."
Salgado was scheduled to be arraigned in federal court in San Francisco
on at least one charge of unlawfully intruding into a computer network
database for the purpose of theft and a separate charge of selling
confidential credit card information via the Internet.
If convicted of both charges, Salgado could face a maximum of 15 years
in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on each count, according
to the FBI. Under federal law, Salgado could be charged with separate
felony counts for information theft of each of the 100,000 accounts that
were illegally obtained. But so far, Grotz said, authorities plan to
file only one count. The investigation remains ongoing and more charges
could be added later.
The FBI still does not know how he allegedly obtained the information.
Agents contacted Salgado on-line and "did some business with him," Grotz
said. But investigators were unable to find out his identity until they
set up the in-person meeting at the airport.
"We believe that he has been hacking into various protected computers
for at least five years," Grotz said. "We don't know the extent of the
damage that he has done. He has gotten these credit card numbers via the
Internet and he has tried to sell them via the Internet. ... But we
still don't know the extent of his activities."
Authorities said that the Salgado case does not appear to be linked to
the recent theft of information on about 20,000 employees of Levi
Strauss, when a hard drive was taken from the firm's San Francisco
headquarters last month.
Grotz said that after Salgado's arrest, agents were planning to search
his residence and his personal computer for evidence related to the
information theft.
Agents did not have any information about Salgado's employment or where
he developed his hacking skills, Grotz said. "The guy obviously has
knowledge," he said.
Grotz said federal agents have seen young males try to gain access to
credit databases more as a lark, but this is believed to be one of the
first cases where someone hacked into an encrypted business database
expressly for the purpose of robbing for a profit.
"We found out about it from some vigilant technicians doing routine
maintenance" on an Internet service provider, Grotz said. That tip
prompted an FBI probe on the Internet that led to Salgado on Wednesday,
he said.
-- By JIM HERRON ZAMORA, the San Francisco Examiner.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 17:23:12 EDT
From: Martin Kaminer <iguana@MIT.EDU>
Subject: File 3--HACK - Texas Driver's License database on the web
------- Forwarded Message
Date--Sun, 25 May 1997 11:15:33
From--FringeWare News Network <email@Fringeware.COM>
Sent from: Paco Xander Nathan <pacoid@fringeware.com>
URGENT NEWS RELEASE -
Regarding the release and use of personal information from Texas motor
vehicle records, i.e. our recent news about the "www.publiclink.com"
web site, the Texas legislature will vote on the floor TOMORROW over
SB1069, which would attach a criminal penalty to such information use,
except for "permitted disclosures".
Note that these criminal penalities and their exceptions have been
substituted onto a proposed bill which was already in play (SB1069)
in the Texas Senate, one which had already been passed in the Texas
House. The bill and its history are available online at:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/
Search for "SB1069" under the bill search link. The Texas legislature
is currently in session, which only happens once every two years, and
only a matter of days remain in the current session for introducing
any legislation.
After "www.publiclink.com" went online, a lawsuit was filed against
the site's publisher, the site was taken down, and the story earned
widespread headlines.
Governor George Bush Jr., et al., expressed concerns over protecting
the privacy of Texas citizens vis-a-vis Internet services such as
Public Link, while failing to mention that Texas State offices have and
will continue to receive revenue from the bulk sales of this same data.
For example, if another driver cuts you off in traffic, you take down
their license plate number, then go home, check the Public Link web site
to find out: the name of the car's owner, where that person lives, with
whom that person lives, their race/height/weight/birthdate, a list of
their neighbors, how they have voted in recent elections, what criminal
convictions they have, etc.
My own comments on KVUE-24 news and the CNN Headline News trailer, along
with similar comments online by Mike Godwin, et al., of EFF, have shown
the "double-edged sword" effect of regulating such information.
Certainly the issue of protecting privacy vs. freedom of information
(since this information is and will remain public record in Texas) comes
to mind, as has the most prevalent argument coming from women's groups
in Texas, that such information, even though it has been available for
years, now placed on the Internet can pose a public threat in terms of
assisting stalkers.
But the real issues run much deeper. On one hand, the information is
available (and has been for years) to anybody with enough means to
hire an attorney or investigator: "Please give me a list of all the
women over age 65, widowed, living alone in a particularly wealthy block
of Dallas". That one *might* cost you $75, but think of the potential
return-on-investment for b&e specialists, televangelists, and other
social vultures.
Public Link has merely made this same data, derived from public record,
available to all who have Internet access. Restrictions from the Texas
legislation on who/what can be listed on the Internet would be pointless
because servers could easily move to Louisiana, Mexico, or even somewhere
out in the Indian Ocean....
One the other hand, look at the trade-off of who's agenda will be served
by making this data only available to those parties authorized for the
"permitted disclosures". Consider that investigative journalists have
used this kind of data to breach stories in the public interest which
the wealthy and powerful might otherwise attempt to keep quiet. Consider
on the flip side that this kind of information is regularly used by the
personnel staff at large corporations, who need to make decisions on
hiring new employees and therefore buy computer-based records about
private individuals: voting records, criminal records, worker's comp,
any available medical data, etc.
Here's the scenario: a personnel director needs to choose between two
applicants for a position, let's say one is a woman from a racial minority
who has had a previous C-section birth and voted Democrat in the past four
elections; then the other applicant is a white male who voted Republican
in the past elections on record. Now really, given the cost of medical
insurance and employee relations these days, whom are they going to pick
for the job?
This exact data is at question. It is commericially available and in
widespread use throughout "human resource departments" and "security"
firms. Moreover, an older issue of workplace drug testing brings in
related concerns. Random drug testing used in corporate America is at
best 60% accurate, i.e. practically meaningless, BUT those tests provide
employers and government agencies with a legal "foot-in-the-door" for
correlating all of the personal information listed above along with the
individual's medical records and SSN. Think about it. Think really hard
about the implications, for a long time, and then ask yourself if drug
testing really concerns "family values", not to mention the other privacy
abuse practices in question.
To the point of Texas Senate Bill 1069, an unofficial comment from one
Texas capitol legislative analyst responsible for independent research of
this issue was that "journalists are going to hate this bill."
If you read the text of SB1069, it becomes hauntingly clear that government
agencies, employers, insurance companies, private investigators, and even
firms which conduct "surveys, marketing, or solicitations", will all keep
their bulk access to Texas citizens personal data, BUT that any other use
would become a criminal offense. Furthermore, this portion of the bill is
what has been added at the last minute, i.e. subsequent to the news reports
about Public Link.
To wit, it will be fine for a spammer to buy and use the data to tailor
"bulk distribution" mailings, but it will become a criminal offense for
anybody to place the same exact data up for public use on a web site.
Also, it will be fine for personnel managers and insurance agents to use
this data in private while deciding about an individual's hiring potential
or quoted insurance rates, but it would become a criminal offense for a
newspaper journalist (or Internet email list participant) to access the
same exact data in public record for the purposes of, say, exposing illegal
hiring practices.
Note that this bill has been slid through the voting process quietly, as a
deliberate act by the legislators. It was substituted onto a bill already
passed by the House, and then "recommended for local & uncontested calendar"
by the Senate, i.e. so as not to draw public attention.
If you live in Texas, we urge you to take action. Flood the legislature.
If you are an attorney or expert familiar with Texas State privacy laws,
please render a written opinion faxed to your representative. Current
estimates project that the SB1069 will pass the Texas Senate tomorrow (i.e.
quietly while most of the state is off on holiday).
1984 is only 13 years away...
Paco Xander Nathan
FringeWare Inc.
25 May 1996
Austin, TX, Earth
------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 May 1997 22:51:01 CST
From: CuD Moderators <cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu>
Subject: File 4--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 May, 1997)
Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are
available at no cost electronically.
CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest
Or, to subscribe, send post with this in the "Subject:: line:
SUBSCRIBE CU-DIGEST
Send the message to: cu-digest-request@weber.ucsd.edu
DO NOT SEND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE MODERATORS.
The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-6436), fax (815-753-6302)
or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL
60115, USA.
To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB CU-DIGEST
Send it to CU-DIGEST-REQUEST@WEBER.UCSD.EDU
(NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line)
Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest
news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT
libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in
the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;"
On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG;
on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet);
CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from
1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome.
In ITALY: ZERO! BBS: +39-11-6507540
UNITED STATES: ftp.etext.org (206.252.8.100) in /pub/CuD/CuD
Web-accessible from: http://www.etext.org/CuD/CuD/
ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/
aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/
world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/CuD/CuD/ (Finland)
ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom)
The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the
Cu Digest WWW site at:
URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long
as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and
they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that
non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise
specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles
relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are
preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts
unless absolutely necessary.
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
violate copyright protections.
------------------------------
End of Computer Underground Digest #9.40
************************************